Value of the electronic patient record: An analysis of the literature

We undertook a systematic review of the literature on the basis of published studies on the benefit and costs of Electronic Patient Records (EPRs) to clarify the issue of whether and to what extent the use of an EPR is worthwhile. We carried out a systematic electronic search for articles published between 1966 and early 2004 using MEDLINE, following up cross-references from the articles found. We searched first for suitable medical subject headings (MeSH) for electronic patient record, benefit and costs. We obtained 7860 citations with the MeSH keyword ''Medical Record System, Computerized". After combination with appropriate keywords this number was reduced to 588, after a review by two reviewers independently based on abstracts down to 95, and after a further review based on full-text articles to 19 covering 20 studies. The publications evaluated thus document the economic benefits of EPR in a number of areas, but they do not make a statement of the cost effectiveness of EPR in general.

[1]  L A Kian,et al.  Justifying the cost of a computer-based patient record. , 1995, Healthcare financial management : journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association.

[2]  A S Neubauer,et al.  [Electronic versus paper-based patient records: a cost-benefit analysis]. , 2001, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[3]  Patrick J O'Connor,et al.  Impact of an Electronic Medical Record on Diabetes Quality of Care , 2005, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[4]  S S el-Gamal,et al.  A Computer-based Clinical Information System , 1987, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[5]  G. Pierpont,et al.  Effect of computerized charting on nursing activity in intensive care. , 1995, Critical care medicine.

[6]  Robin Blair,et al.  EMRs, quality of care and patient perception. Tallahassee specialty practice proves that the power of EMRs extends far beyond its own walls and its practitioners. , 2003, Health management technology.

[7]  K. Marill,et al.  Prospective, randomized trial of template-assisted versus undirected written recording of physician records in the emergency department. , 1999, Annals of emergency medicine.

[8]  Fox Mr,et al.  What works. Electronic repository saves $1 million plus. , 1998 .

[9]  Charles Safran,et al.  Can a Large Institution Go Paperless? , 1998, MedInfo.

[10]  Wall Tj,et al.  The What Works awards. Three dramatically different solutions demonstrate creativity and effectiveness. , 1998 .

[11]  P W Moorman,et al.  An Inventory of Publications on Computer-Based Medical Records: An Update , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[12]  A. Neubauer,et al.  Elektronische oder papiergebundene Patientenakte Ein Kosten-Nutzen-Vergleich , 2001, Der Ophthalmologe.

[13]  M Smith,et al.  What works. Imaging saves Pascack Valley Hospital $200,000 a year ... not counting paper. , 1997, Health management technology.

[14]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of Computer-based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Clinician Performance and Patient Outcome: A Critical Appraisal of Research , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[16]  Winda Antoine,et al.  Electronic miracle. Memorial Hermann put its patient files online and watch its revenue grow. , 2002, Health Forum journal.

[17]  G. Fleisher,et al.  What works. Children's Hospital ER automates records to save lives and money. , 1997, Health management technology.

[18]  K Sandrick,et al.  Calculating ROI for CPRs. , 1998, Health management technology.

[19]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 1998, JAMA.

[20]  Brian J Wells,et al.  Using the Electronic Medical Record to Enhance the Use of Combination Drugs , 2003, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[21]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[22]  C G Ward,et al.  A qualitative comparison of paper flowsheets vs a computer-based clinical information system. , 1991, Chest.

[23]  R. Roine,et al.  Assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of the literature. , 2001, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[24]  C. McDonald,et al.  Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations. Effects on resource utilization. , 1993, JAMA.

[25]  Christian Lovis,et al.  Section 2: Patient Records: Electronic Patient Records: Moving from Islands and Bridges towards Electronic Health Records for Continuity of Care , 2007, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[26]  Jordan R Asher,et al.  Time and money. A look at message automation via a computerized patient record. , 2003, MGMA connexion.

[27]  D L Myers,et al.  An integrated data warehouse system: development, implementation, and early outcomes. , 2000, Managed care interface.

[28]  K Kahl,et al.  Automated nursing documentation system provides a favorable return on investment. , 1991, The Journal of nursing administration.

[29]  Dave Carpenter,et al.  Three approaches to ROI. , 2005, Hospitals & health networks.

[30]  C White,et al.  Automating the bedside. , 1997, Healthcare informatics : the business magazine for information and communication systems.

[31]  M R Fox,et al.  What works. Electronic repository saves $1 million plus. , 1998, Health management technology.

[32]  E. Keeler,et al.  Costs and benefits of health information technology. , 2006, Evidence report/technology assessment.