Mathematical Manipulative Models: In Defense of “Beanbag Biology”

Mathematical manipulative models have had a long history of influence in biological research and in secondary school education, but they are frequently neglected in undergraduate biology education. By linking mathematical manipulative models in a four-step process—1) use of physical manipulatives, 2) interactive exploration of computer simulations, 3) derivation of mathematical relationships from core principles, and 4) analysis of real data sets—we demonstrate a process that we have shared in biological faculty development workshops led by staff from the BioQUEST Curriculum Consortium over the past 24 yr. We built this approach based upon a broad survey of literature in mathematical educational research that has convincingly demonstrated the utility of multiple models that involve physical, kinesthetic learning to actual data and interactive simulations. Two projects that use this approach are introduced: The Biological Excel Simulations and Tools in Exploratory, Experiential Mathematics (ESTEEM) Project (http://bioquest.org/esteem) and Numerical Undergraduate Mathematical Biology Education (NUMB3R5 COUNT; http://bioquest.org/numberscount). Examples here emphasize genetics, ecology, population biology, photosynthesis, cancer, and epidemiology. Mathematical manipulative models help learners break through prior fears to develop an appreciation for how mathematical reasoning informs problem solving, inference, and precise communication in biology and enhance the diversity of quantitative biology education.

[1]  B H Margolin,et al.  Differences in the rates of gene amplification in nontumorigenic and tumorigenic cell lines as measured by Luria-Delbrück fluctuation analysis. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Joan L. Aron,et al.  Mathematical modeling: the dynamics of infection. , 2007 .

[3]  Evelyn J. Sowell.  Effects of Manipulative Materials in Mathematics Instruction , 1989 .

[4]  A. Whiteley,et al.  Classroom Mark-Recapture with Crickets , 2007 .

[5]  A Test of Hypotheses about Random Mutation , 2009 .

[6]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  Irreproducible Results and the Breeding of Pigs (or Nondegenerate Limit Random Variables in Biology) , 1976 .

[7]  J. Tashiro,et al.  Using Manipulatives To Teach Quantitative Concepts in Ecology. , 1997 .

[8]  G. A. Horridge,et al.  Animal species and evolution. , 1964 .

[9]  Peter Kraft,et al.  Complex diseases, complex genes: keeping pathways on the right track. , 2009, Epidemiology.

[10]  Q Zheng,et al.  Progress of a half century in the study of the Luria-Delbrück distribution. , 1999, Mathematical biosciences.

[11]  J. Jungck.  "Crossing the Chasm" of Curricular Reform: BioQUEST Curriculum Consortium Invites CAL-laboration , 2012 .

[12]  U. Netlogo Wilensky,et al.  Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling , 1999 .

[13]  J. Haldane.  A Defense of Beanbag Genetics , 2015, Perspectives in biology and medicine.

[14]  P. Soderberg,et al.  An examination of problem-based teaching and learning in population genetics and evolution using EVOLVE, a computer simulation , 2003 .

[15]  J. Haldane.  A defense of beanbag genetics. 1964. , 2008, International journal of epidemiology.

[16]  Douglas A. Grouws,et al.  Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. , 1992 .

[17]  John R. Jungck,et al.  Ten Equations That Changed Biology: Mathematics in Problem-Solving Biology Curricula. , 1997 .

[18]  Lurias,et al.  MUTATIONS OF BACTERIA FROM VIRUS SENSITIVITY TO VIRUS RESISTANCE’-’ , 2003 .

[19]  H. Wahlström,et al.  A Reed-Frost model of the spread of tuberculosis within seven Swedish extensive farmed fallow deer herds. , 1998, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[20]  G. Pólya,et al.  Über die Statistik verketteter Vorgänge , 1923 .

[21]  C. Hurd,et al.  Fitting ecological and physiological data to rectangular hyperbolae: a comparison of methods using Monte Carlo simulations , 1994 .

[22]  R. Borges.  Commentary: The objection is sustained: a defence of the defense of beanbag genetics. , 2008, International journal of epidemiology.

[23]  J. S. Gale.  Random Genetic Drift , 1980 .

[24]  A ‘Striking’ Demonstration of the Poisson Distribution , 2005 .

[25]  Larry S. Liebovitch,et al.  Fractals and Chaos Simplified for the Life Sciences , 1998 .

[26]  A Test of Hypotheses about Random Mutation: Using Classic Experiments To Teach Experimental Design. , 2001 .

[27]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  Mathematics Is Biology's Next Microscope, Only Better; Biology Is Mathematics' Next Physics, Only Better , 2004, PLoS biology.

[28]  Eric Sowey,et al.  Striking Demonstrations in Teaching Statistics , 2001 .

[29]  Holly Gaff,et al.  Optimal control applied to vaccination and treatment strategies for various epidemiological models. , 2009, Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE.

[30]  B. Hayden,et al.  The mean, the median, and the St. Petersburg paradox. , 2009, Judgment and decision making.

[31]  J. Shaughnessy.  Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions. , 1992 .