Functional brain segmentation using inter‐subject correlation in fMRI

The human brain continuously processes massive amounts of rich sensory information. To better understand such highly complex brain processes, modern neuroimaging studies are increasingly utilizing experimental setups that better mimic daily‐life situations. A new exploratory data‐analysis approach, functional segmentation inter‐subject correlation analysis (FuSeISC), was proposed to facilitate the analysis of functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) data sets collected in these experiments. The method provides a new type of functional segmentation of brain areas, not only characterizing areas that display similar processing across subjects but also areas in which processing across subjects is highly variable. FuSeISC was tested using fMRI data sets collected during traditional block‐design stimuli (37 subjects) as well as naturalistic auditory narratives (19 subjects). The method identified spatially local and/or bilaterally symmetric clusters in several cortical areas, many of which are known to be processing the types of stimuli used in the experiments. The method is not only useful for spatial exploration of large fMRI data sets obtained using naturalistic stimuli, but also has other potential applications, such as generation of a functional brain atlases including both lower‐ and higher‐order processing areas. Finally, as a part of FuSeISC, a criterion‐based sparsification of the shared nearest‐neighbor graph was proposed for detecting clusters in noisy data. In the tests with synthetic data, this technique was superior to well‐known clustering methods, such as Ward's method, affinity propagation, and K‐means ++ . Hum Brain Mapp 38:2643–2665, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  D. Heeger,et al.  Reliability of cortical activity during natural stimulation , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  G. Varoquaux,et al.  Connectivity‐based parcellation: Critique and implications , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[3]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Michael Schröder,et al.  Bilateral thalamic gray matter changes in patients with restless legs syndrome , 2005, NeuroImage.

[5]  P. Deb Finite Mixture Models , 2008 .

[6]  Hesheng Liu,et al.  Functional Connectivity Architecture of the Human Brain , 2014, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[7]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Inter-Subject Correlation of Brain Hemodynamic Responses During Watching a Movie: Localization in Space and Frequency , 2009, Front. Neuroinform..

[8]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[9]  David B. Shmoys,et al.  A Best Possible Heuristic for the k-Center Problem , 1985, Math. Oper. Res..

[10]  Polina Golland,et al.  Search for patterns of functional specificity in the brain: A nonparametric hierarchical Bayesian model for group fMRI data , 2011, NeuroImage.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[12]  Ray A. Jarvis,et al.  Clustering Using a Similarity Measure Based on Shared Near Neighbors , 1973, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[13]  Daniel S. Margulies,et al.  NeuroVault.org: A repository for sharing unthresholded statistical maps, parcellations, and atlases of the human brain , 2016, NeuroImage.

[14]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Building a Science of Individual Differences from fMRI , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  On Clustering fMRI Time Series , 1999, NeuroImage.

[16]  J. Munkres ALGORITHMS FOR THE ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSIORTATION tROBLEMS* , 1957 .

[17]  J. S. Guntupalli,et al.  A Model of Representational Spaces in Human Cortex , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Towards natural stimulation in fMRI—Issues of data analysis , 2007, NeuroImage.

[19]  Eleonora Maggioni,et al.  Constructing fMRI connectivity networks: A whole brain functional parcellation method for node definition , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Multi-level bootstrap analysis of stable clusters in resting-state fMRI , 2009, NeuroImage.

[21]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  What Is the Human Connectome , 2009 .

[22]  Johannes Blömer,et al.  Simple Methods for Initializing the EM Algorithm for Gaussian Mixture Models , 2013, ArXiv.

[23]  M. P. van den Heuvel,et al.  Normalized Cut Group Clustering of Resting-State fMRI Data , 2008, PloS one.

[24]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  Can Shared-Neighbor Distances Defeat the Curse of Dimensionality? , 2010, SSDBM.

[25]  R. Malach,et al.  Intersubject Synchronization of Cortical Activity During Natural Vision , 2004, Science.

[26]  Jussi Tohka,et al.  A versatile software package for inter-subject correlation based analyses of fMRI , 2014, Front. Neuroinform..

[27]  Delbert Dueck,et al.  Affinity Propagation: Clustering Data by Passing Messages , 2009 .

[28]  Topi Tanskanen,et al.  Face recognition and cortical responses: Effect of stimulus duration , 2007, NeuroImage.

[29]  Scott A. Huettel,et al.  Characterizing individual differences in functional connectivity using dual-regression and seed-based approaches , 2014, NeuroImage.

[30]  L. Nummenmaa,et al.  The brains of high functioning autistic individuals do not synchronize with those of others☆ , 2013, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[31]  M. Fox,et al.  Individual Variability in Functional Connectivity Architecture of the Human Brain , 2013, Neuron.

[32]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Which fMRI clustering gives good brain parcellations? , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[33]  J. MacQueen Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[34]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Unsupervised Learning of Finite Mixture Models , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[35]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Informatics and Data Mining Tools and Strategies for the Human Connectome Project , 2011, Front. Neuroinform..

[36]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Extrinsic and intrinsic systems in the posterior cortex of the human brain revealed during natural sensory stimulation. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  Vipin Kumar,et al.  Finding Clusters of Different Sizes, Shapes, and Densities in Noisy, High Dimensional Data , 2003, SDM.

[38]  Steen Moeller,et al.  The Human Connectome Project: A data acquisition perspective , 2012, NeuroImage.

[39]  Pia Tikka,et al.  Spatial variability of functional brain networks in early-blind and sighted subjects , 2014, NeuroImage.

[40]  R Cameron Craddock,et al.  A whole brain fMRI atlas generated via spatially constrained spectral clustering , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[41]  A. L. Bowley The Standard Deviation of the Correlation Coefficient , 1928 .

[42]  Istvan Molnar-Szakacs,et al.  Beyond superior temporal cortex: intersubject correlations in narrative speech comprehension. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[43]  R. Buckner,et al.  Parcellating Cortical Functional Networks in Individuals , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  Jukka-Pekka Kauppi,et al.  Inter-Subject Correlation in fMRI: Method Validation against Stimulus-Model Based Analysis , 2012, PloS one.

[45]  Jussi Tohka,et al.  Post-print: Effects of spatial smoothing on inter-subject correlation based analysis of FMRI , 2014 .

[46]  Marek McGann,et al.  How Mean is the Mean? , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[47]  K. Amunts,et al.  Individual variability is not noise , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  M. Cugmas,et al.  On comparing partitions , 2015 .

[49]  Parag Chordia,et al.  Inter‐subject synchronization of brain responses during natural music listening , 2013, The European journal of neuroscience.

[50]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[51]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[52]  R. Hari,et al.  Emotions promote social interaction by synchronizing brain activity across individuals , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  Sanjoy Dasgupta,et al.  A Two-Round Variant of EM for Gaussian Mixtures , 2000, UAI.

[54]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  On Convergence Properties of the EM Algorithm for Gaussian Mixtures , 1996, Neural Computation.

[55]  J. H. Ward Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function , 1963 .

[56]  Paul D. McNicholas,et al.  Model-Based Clustering , 2016, Journal of Classification.

[57]  Delbert Dueck,et al.  Clustering by Passing Messages Between Data Points , 2007, Science.

[58]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[59]  Linda Geerligs,et al.  State and Trait Components of Functional Connectivity: Individual Differences Vary with Mental State , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[60]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Approaches to Capture Variance Differences in Rest fMRI Networks in the Spatial Geometric Features: Application to Schizophrenia , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[61]  Sergei Vassilvitskii,et al.  k-means++: the advantages of careful seeding , 2007, SODA '07.

[62]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[63]  Frank E. Pollick,et al.  Spectators’ Aesthetic Experience of Sound and Movement in Dance Performance: A Transdisciplinary Investigation , 2016 .

[64]  Pia Tikka,et al.  Functional Subdivision of Group-ICA Results of fMRI Data Collected during Cinema Viewing , 2012, PloS one.

[65]  Bryan R. Conroy,et al.  A Common, High-Dimensional Model of the Representational Space in Human Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2011, Neuron.

[66]  Iiro P. Jääskeläinen,et al.  Brain hemodynamic activity during viewing and re-viewing of comedy movies explained by experienced humor , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[67]  J. A. Movshon,et al.  The dependence of response amplitude and variance of cat visual cortical neurones on stimulus contrast , 1981, Experimental Brain Research.

[68]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Model-Based Clustering, Discriminant Analysis, and Density Estimation , 2002 .

[69]  James L. Harris Atlas of Clinical Fungi, 2nd Edition by G.S. deHoog H. Gene, and M.J. Figueras. Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures , 2001, Mycopathologia.

[70]  Xiangyu Long,et al.  Functional segmentation of the brain cortex using high model order group PICA , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[71]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Clustering inter-subject correlation matrices in functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2010, Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine.

[72]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Finite Mixture Models , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[73]  Daniel T. Larose,et al.  Discovering Knowledge in Data: An Introduction to Data Mining , 2005 .

[74]  Bryan R. Conroy,et al.  Function-based Intersubject Alignment of Human Cortical Anatomy , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[75]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  A high-resolution 7-Tesla fMRI dataset from complex natural stimulation with an audio movie , 2014, Scientific data.

[76]  J Mazziotta,et al.  A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[77]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Spatially constrained hierarchical parcellation of the brain with resting-state fMRI , 2013, NeuroImage.

[78]  Teofilo F. GONZALEZ,et al.  Clustering to Minimize the Maximum Intercluster Distance , 1985, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[79]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  Temporal dynamics of musical emotions examined through intersubject synchrony of brain activity. , 2015, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.