Technology Policy for Energy and the Environment

We analyze the implications of the interaction of market failures associated with pollution and the environment, and market failures associated with the development and diffusion of new technology. These combined market failures imply a strong prima facie case for public policy intervention to foster environmentally beneficial technology. Both theory and empirical evidence suggest that the rate and direction of technological advance is influenced by incentives from the market and from regulation. Environmental policy based on incentive-based approaches is more likely to foster cost-effective technology innovation and diffusion than policy based on command and control approaches. In addition, society's investments in the development and diffusion of new environmentally beneficial technologies is very likely to be less than socially desirable in the presence of weak or nonexistent environmental policies that would otherwise foster such technology. Positive knowledge, adoption spillovers, and information problems further weaken innovation incentives. While environmental technology policy is fraught with difficulties, a long-term view suggests a strategy of experimenting with different policy approaches and systematically evaluating their success.

[1]  R. Pindyck,et al.  The Learning Curve and Optimal Production Under Uncertainty , 1987 .

[2]  R. Newell,et al.  Information programs for technology adoption: The case of energy-efficiency audits , 2004 .

[3]  G. Boyd,et al.  Estimating the linkage between energy efficiency and productivity , 2000 .

[4]  David Popp,et al.  Induced Innovation and Energy Prices , 2001 .

[5]  C. Kolstad,et al.  Cost Functions and Nonlinear Prices: Estimating a Technology with Quality-Differentiated Inputs , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[6]  D. Greene CAFE OR PRICE?: An Analysis of the Effects of Federal Fuel Economy Regulations and Gasoline Price on New Car MPG, 1978-89 , 1990, Controlling Automobile Air Pollution.

[7]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U , 1995 .

[8]  Tom Tietenberg,et al.  Differential Environmental Regulation: Effects on Electric Utility Capital Turnover and Emissions , 1993 .

[9]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Environmental Policy and Technological Change , 2002 .

[10]  R. Stavins,et al.  Experience with Market-Based Environmental Policy Instruments , 2002 .

[11]  Ashoka Mody,et al.  Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology , 1996 .

[12]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[13]  A. Purvis,et al.  The Technology Pork Barrel , 1992 .

[14]  P. Portney,et al.  Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U . S . Manufacturing : What Does the Evidence Tell Us ? , 1999 .

[15]  Gale A. Boyd,et al.  The Impact of Environmental Constraints on Productivity Improvement and Energy Efficiency in Integrated Paper and Steel Plants , 1996 .

[16]  Wesley A. Magat,et al.  Pollution control and technological advance: A dynamic model of the firm , 1978 .

[17]  R. Kemp Environmental policy and technical change , 1997 .

[18]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[19]  G. Brady,et al.  Capital Turnover and Marketable Pollution Rights , 1988, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[20]  Mark J. Roberts,et al.  Environmental Regulations and Productivity Growth: The Case of Fossil-fueled Electric Power Generation , 1983, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  A. Jaffe,et al.  The energy paradox and the diffusion of conservation technology , 1994 .

[22]  R. Cowan Nuclear Power Reactors: A Study in Technological Lock-in , 1990, The Journal of Economic History.

[23]  Roger G. Noll,et al.  The Technology Pork Barrel , 1991 .

[24]  David Popp,et al.  The effect of new technology on energy consumption , 2001 .

[25]  Z. Griliches The Search for R&D Spillovers , 1991 .

[26]  R. Stewart Regulation, Innovation, and Administrative Law: A Conceptual Framework , 1981 .

[27]  Robert E. Evenson,et al.  Induced Innovation: Technology, Institutions, and Development , 1978 .

[28]  L. Bui,et al.  Environmental regulation and labor demand : evidence from the South Coast Air Basin , 2000 .

[29]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  The Quality of Ideas: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators , 1999 .

[30]  Gilbert E. Metcalf,et al.  Energy tax credits and residential conservation investment: Evidence from panel data , 1995 .

[31]  William A. Pizer,et al.  Instrument Choice for Environmental Protection When Technological Innovation is Endogenous , 2003 .

[32]  K. Lancaster,et al.  Consumer Demand. A New Approach. , 1972 .

[33]  A. Marin,et al.  Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control: Comment☆ , 1991 .

[34]  P. Romer,et al.  Should the Government Subsidize Supply or Demand in the Market for Scientists and Engineers? , 2000, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[35]  Ronald J. Shadbegian,et al.  Pollution Abatement Costs, Regulation, and Plant-Level Productivity , 1995 .

[36]  Austan Goolsbee,et al.  Does Government R&D Policy Mainly Benefit Scientists and Engineers? , 1998 .

[37]  P. David Path Dependence and the Quest for Historical Economics: One More chorus of Ballad of QWERTY , 1997 .

[38]  Lawrence J. White,et al.  Innovation in pollution control , 1986 .

[39]  J. Geanakoplos,et al.  Free Entry and Social Inefficiency , 1986 .

[40]  Wallace E. Oates,et al.  Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm? , 1995 .

[41]  John P. Weyant,et al.  Costs of Reducing Global Carbon Emissions , 1993 .

[42]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[43]  Carlos Montalvo Corral,et al.  Environmental Policy and Technological Innovation , 2002 .

[44]  Roger G. Noll,et al.  STRUCTURE AND PROCESS, POLITICS AND POLICY: ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS AND THE POLITICAL CONTROL OF AGENCIES , 1989 .

[45]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[46]  Chulho Jung,et al.  Incentives for Advanced Pollution Abatement Technology at the Industry Level: An Evaluation of Policy Alternatives , 1996 .

[47]  Scott Milliman,et al.  Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control: Reply , 1992 .

[48]  Suzi Kerr,et al.  Policy-Induced Technology Adoption: Evidence from the U.S. Lead Phasedown , 2001 .

[49]  Sidney G. Winter,et al.  Modeling Industrial Dynamics with Innovative Entrants , 2000 .

[50]  Allen S. Bellas,et al.  Empirical evidence of advances in scrubber technology , 1998 .

[51]  Richard O. Zerbe,et al.  THEORETICAL EFFICIENCY IN POLLUTION CONTROL , 1970 .

[52]  J. Islas,et al.  Getting round the lock-in in electricity generating systems: the example of the gas turbine , 1997 .

[53]  John Hicks,et al.  The Theory of Wages , 1933 .

[54]  P. David,et al.  Discussion Papers in Economic and Social History Path Dependence and the Quest for Historical Economics: One More Chorus of the Ballad of Qwerty , 2022 .

[55]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Building Programme Evaluation into the Design of Public Research‐Support Programmes , 2002 .

[56]  Ronald J. Shadbegian,et al.  Environmental Regulation, Investment Timing, and Technology Choice , 1997 .

[57]  James E. McMahon,et al.  Effects of Appliance Standards on Product Price and Attributes: An Hedonic Pricing Model , 1997 .

[58]  Bruce Paton,et al.  The economics of energy efficiency: insights from voluntary participation programs , 2000 .

[59]  Wesley A. Magat,et al.  The Effects of Environmental Regulation on Innovation , 1979 .

[60]  A. Jaffe,et al.  The Induced Innovation Hypothesis and Energy-Saving Technological Change , 1998 .

[61]  Suthathip Yaisawarng,et al.  The Effects of Sulfur Dioxide Controls on Productivity Change in the U.S. Electric Power Industry , 1994 .

[62]  P. Douglas,et al.  The Theory of Wages , 1934 .

[63]  Y. Katsoulacos,et al.  Environmental innovation, spillovers and optimal policy rules , 1996 .

[64]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study , 1996, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[65]  P. Goldberg,et al.  The Effects of the Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency Standards , 1996 .

[66]  S. Hultén,et al.  Escaping lock-in: The case of the electric vehicle☆ , 1996 .

[67]  Robert N. Stavins,et al.  Incentive-Based Environmental Regulation: A New Era from an Old Idea , 1990 .

[68]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Dynamic incentives of environmental regulations: The , 1995 .

[69]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Dynamic Incentives of Environmental Regulations: The Effects of Alternative Policy Instruments on Te , 1995 .

[70]  Scott Stern,et al.  Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 1 , 2001 .

[71]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[72]  Vernon W. Ruttan,et al.  INDUCED INNOVATION, EVOLUTIONARY THEORY AND PATH DEPENDENCE: SOURCES OF TECHNICAL CHANGE* , 1997 .

[73]  Anastasios Xepapadeas,et al.  Environmental policy and market structure. , 1996 .