Social Capital, Karl Polanyi, and American Social and Institutional Economics

Over the past decade there has been a surge of literature on so-called "social capital" (SK). It is unfortunate that the term social capital has been selected to describe the rich, complex set of social networks under investigation (Robison et al.). Though we have doubts about the terminology, we agree with L. J. Robison et al. that the term is firmlyestablished and here to stay. This misnomer may explain why the parallel literature of social economics has been neglected in the popular discussion of SK. There have been fledgling attempts to synthesize works, but it is still underdeveloped. The contributions of the Karl Polanyi group are rarely formally recognized. Further, the long-standing interest in the placement of the economy within society as represented by the work of the Association of Social Economics (ASE) and the Association for Evolutionary Economics (AFEE) is neglected. The authors hope that this paper will be part of, or initiate, an effort to examine explicitly these relationships and, in so doing, to increase the visibility of the work of the Polanyi, ASE, and AFEE groups by linking them to current SK discourse. The authors wish to emphasize that there is no intent to disparage current SK literature because it neglects the writings of social and institutional economists. Although we would like to see more attention to this economic literature, even that is not the major concern. The major concern is that pooling the intellectual efforts of the various groups may be beneficial to the examination of the complex issues involved in "SK."

[1]  R. Putnam Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital , 1995, The City Reader.

[2]  L. Robison,et al.  Is Social Capital Really Capital , 2000 .

[3]  P. Bush,et al.  The Theory of Institutional Change , 1987, Evolutionary Economics.

[4]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  E. O’Boyle On caring and the restoration of social order. , 1978, Review of social economy.

[6]  Kendall P. Cochran Economics as a Moral Science , 1974 .

[7]  James William Coleman,et al.  Competition and the Structure of Industrial Society: Reply to Braithwaite , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  P. Bourdieu Forms of Capital , 2002 .

[9]  J. Stanfield,et al.  Where has love gone? Reciprocity, redistribution, and the Nurturance Gap , 1997 .

[10]  H. Cohen,et al.  The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics , 1989 .

[11]  J. Wisman The Challenge of Humanistic Economics , 1980 .

[12]  Marc R. Tool The Discretionary Economy , 1985 .

[13]  A. Portes,et al.  Chapter 3 – Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology* , 2000 .

[14]  J. Stanfield The Economic Thought of Karl Polanyi , 1986 .

[15]  M. Lutz,et al.  The challenge of humanistic economics , 1979 .

[16]  J. Stanfield The Economic Thought of Karl Polanyi: Lives and Livelihood , 1979 .

[17]  A. Gruchy Modern Economic Thought: The American Contribution , 1967 .

[18]  Bernard R. Hodgson,et al.  Economics as Moral Science , 2000 .

[19]  A. Portes Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[20]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly , 2009 .

[21]  John Field,et al.  Social Capital: Critical Perspectives , 2000 .

[22]  A. Portes,et al.  The downside of social capital , 1996 .