Binaural hearing with electrical stimulation

Bilateral cochlear implantation is becoming a standard of care in many clinics. While much benefit has been shown through bilateral implantation, patients who have bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) still do not perform as well as normal hearing listeners in sound localization and understanding speech in noisy environments. This difference in performance can arise from a number of different factors, including the areas of hardware and engineering, surgical precision and pathology of the auditory system in deaf persons. While surgical precision and individual pathology are factors that are beyond careful control, improvements can be made in the areas of clinical practice and the engineering of binaural speech processors. These improvements should be grounded in a good understanding of the sensitivities of bilateral CI patients to the acoustic binaural cues that are important to normal hearing listeners for sound localization and speech in noise understanding. To this end, we review the current state-of-the-art in the understanding of the sensitivities of bilateral CI patients to binaural cues in electric hearing, and highlight the important issues and challenges as they relate to clinical practice and the development of new binaural processing strategies. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled .

[1]  A. Engel,et al.  Spatiotemporal Patterns of Cortical Activity with Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Congenital Deafness , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  J. Rinzel,et al.  Sodium along with low-threshold potassium currents enhance coincidence detection of subthreshold noisy signals in MSO neurons. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  B. Papsin,et al.  Auditory brainstem activity in children with 9–30 months of bilateral cochlear implant use , 2007, Hearing Research.

[4]  N. Durlach Equalization and Cancellation Theory of Binaural Masking‐Level Differences , 1963 .

[5]  Fernando R Nodal,et al.  Training-Induced Plasticity of Auditory Localization in Adult Mammals , 2006, PLoS biology.

[6]  D T Lawson,et al.  Bilateral cochlear implants controlled by a single speech processor. , 1998, The American journal of otology.

[7]  R Y Litovsky,et al.  Investigation of the relationship among three common measures of precedence: fusion, localization dominance, and discrimination suppression. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  G M Clark,et al.  Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  J. Rinzel,et al.  Enhancement of Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Phase Locking for Small Inputs by a Low-Threshold Outward Current in Auditory Neurons , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Binaural masking level differences in actual and simulated bilateral cochlear implant listeners. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Tina M. Grieco-Calub,et al.  Spatial Acuity in 2-to-3-Year-Old Children With Normal Acoustic Hearing, Unilateral Cochlear Implants, and Bilateral Cochlear Implants , 2012, Ear and hearing.

[12]  Ruth Y Litovsky,et al.  Review of recent work on spatial hearing skills in children with bilateral cochlear implants , 2011, Cochlear implants international.

[13]  R. V. Hoesel,et al.  Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users. , 2007 .

[14]  Virginia Best,et al.  Binaural interference and auditory grouping. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Michael Dorman,et al.  Central auditory development in children with bilateral cochlear implants. , 2006, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[16]  R. M. Burger,et al.  Dissecting the circuitry of the auditory system , 2003, Trends in Neurosciences.

[17]  H S Colburn,et al.  The precedence effect. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  R. V. Hoesel Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants. , 2004 .

[19]  W. Baumgartner,et al.  Effects of interaural time differences in fine structure and envelope on lateral discrimination in electric hearing. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  R V Shannon,et al.  Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Ruth Y Litovsky,et al.  Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Children: Localization Acuity Measured with Minimum Audible Angle , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[22]  H. Colburn,et al.  Models of Brainstem Responses to Bilateral Electrical Stimulation , 2009, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[23]  L A JEFFRESS,et al.  A place theory of sound localization. , 1948, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[24]  Thomas J Balkany,et al.  Benefits of bilateral cochlear implantation: a review , 2007, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[25]  R. Cowan,et al.  Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking , 2003, Hearing Research.

[26]  Clemens Zierhofer,et al.  Temporal fine structure in cochlear implants: Preliminary speech perception results in Cantonese-speaking implant users , 2010, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[27]  E R Hafter,et al.  Detection of interaural differences of time in trains of high-frequency clicks as a function of interclick interval and number. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Daniel J. Tollin Development of Sound Localization Mechanisms , 2009 .

[29]  L R Bernstein Auditory processing of interaural timing information: New insights , 2001, Journal of neuroscience research.

[30]  Ruth Y Litovsky,et al.  Bilateral cochlear implants in adults and children. , 2004, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[31]  Markus Brunner,et al.  Speech and music perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy: preliminary results , 2007, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[32]  F. E. Offeciers,et al.  Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Children: Binaural Unmasking , 2009, Audiology and Neurotology.

[33]  R. Shannon,et al.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Philip X Joris,et al.  Binaural and cochlear disparities , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  P. Rakić Development and modifiability of the cerebral cortex. , 1982, Neurosciences Research Program bulletin.

[36]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Extents of laterality and binaural interference effects. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Johannes C. Dahmen,et al.  Learning to hear: plasticity of auditory cortical processing , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[38]  G. Clark,et al.  Psychophysical and speech perception studies: a case report on a binaural cochlear implant subject. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  R. V. van Hoesel,et al.  Observer weighting of level and timing cues in bilateral cochlear implant users. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  Stefan Kerber,et al.  Sound Localization in Noise by Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear Implant Users , 2012, Ear and hearing.

[41]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  The development and modifiability of the cerebral cortex. Overview. , 1982, Neurosciences Research Program bulletin.

[42]  J. Lu,et al.  Effects of contralateral sound stimulation on unit activity of ventral cochlear nucleus neurons , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  M. Hansen,et al.  Performance over time on adults with simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants. , 2010, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[44]  Christopher J. Long,et al.  Binaural Unmasking with Bilateral Cochlear Implants , 2006, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[45]  Yi Hu,et al.  Speech recognition by bilateral cochlear implant users in a cocktail-party setting. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  Robert K Shepherd,et al.  Basis of electrical stimulation of the cochlea and the cochlear nucleus. , 2006, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[47]  R. Litovsky,et al.  Interaural Time-Delay Sensitivity in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users: Effects of Pulse Rate, Modulation Rate, and Place of Stimulation , 2009, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[48]  Observer weighting of level and timing cues in bilateral cochlear implant users , 2008 .

[49]  D. Irvine,et al.  Plasticity of spectral processing. , 2005, International review of neurobiology.

[50]  E R Hafter,et al.  Detection of interaural differences of intensity in trains of high-frequency clicks as a function of interclick interval and number. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[51]  P M Seligman,et al.  A signal processor for a multiple-electrode hearing prosthesis. , 1984, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[52]  Richard Van Hoesel,et al.  Sound-Direction Identification, Interaural Time Delay Discrimination, and Speech Intelligibility Advantages in Noise for a Bilateral Cochlear Implant User , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[53]  R. V. van Hoesel,et al.  Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  Ruth Y Litovsky,et al.  Effect of age at onset of deafness on binaural sensitivity in electric hearing in humans. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  Ruth Y Litovsky,et al.  Benefits of bilateral cochlear implants and/or hearing aids in children , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[56]  Armin H. Seidl,et al.  Development of sound localization mechanisms in the mongolian gerbil is shaped by early acoustic experience. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[57]  S A Shamma,et al.  Stereausis: binaural processing without neural delays. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[58]  Virginia Best,et al.  Binaural interference in bilateral cochlear-implant listeners. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[59]  Blake S. Wilson,et al.  The Surprising Performance of Present-Day Cochlear Implants , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[60]  Michael M Merzenich,et al.  Perceptual Learning Directs Auditory Cortical Map Reorganization through Top-Down Influences , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[61]  Alan Kan,et al.  Studies on bilateral cochlear implants at the University of Wisconsin's Binaural Hearing and Speech Laboratory. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[62]  Ruth Y Litovsky,et al.  Spatial Hearing and Speech Intelligibility in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users , 2009, Ear and hearing.

[63]  A. Zeiberg,et al.  Lateralization of complex binaural stimuli: a weighted-image model. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[64]  M. Dorman,et al.  The effect of parametric variations of cochlear implant processors on speech understanding. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[65]  Daniel Pressnitzer,et al.  The case of the missing delay lines: synthetic delays obtained by cross-channel phase interaction. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[66]  G. F. Cooper,et al.  Development of the Brain depends on the Visual Environment , 1970, Nature.

[67]  V. Kotak,et al.  Long-Lasting Inhibitory Synaptic Depression is Age- and Calcium-Dependent , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[68]  B. Walmsley,et al.  Reduced low‐voltage activated K+ conductances and enhanced central excitability in a congenitally deaf (dn/dn) mouse , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[69]  Alan Kan,et al.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on binaural fusion and lateralization in bilateral cochlear-implant users. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[70]  J. Kaas,et al.  The reorganization of somatosensory and motor cortex after peripheral nerve or spinal cord injury in primates. , 2000, Progress in brain research.

[71]  A new approach to comparing binaural masking level differences at low and high frequencies , 1997 .

[72]  Patricia A. Leake,et al.  Frequency Map for the Human Cochlear Spiral Ganglion: Implications for Cochlear Implants , 2007, Journal for the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[73]  R. Snyder,et al.  Chronic electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant promotes survival of spiral ganglion neurons after neonatal deafness , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[74]  H Steven Colburn,et al.  Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[75]  K. Plant,et al.  Speech Perception as a Function of Electrical Stimulation Rate: Using the Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant System , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[76]  Becky B. Poon,et al.  Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants: Development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[77]  S van de Par,et al.  A new approach to comparing binaural masking level differences at low and high frequencies. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[78]  Piotr Majdak,et al.  Binaural jitter improves interaural time-difference sensitivity of cochlear implantees at high pulse rates , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[79]  William M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants , 1991, Nature.

[80]  J. Kaas,et al.  The reorganization of somatosensory cortex following peripheral nerve damage in adult and developing mammals. , 1983, Annual review of neuroscience.

[81]  Piotr Majdak,et al.  Lateralization discrimination of interaural time delays in four-pulse sequences in electric and acoustic hearing. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[82]  Richard S. Tyler,et al.  Speech Perception and Localization With Adults With Bilateral Sequential Cochlear Implants , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[83]  Tina M. Grieco-Calub,et al.  Using the Observer-Based Psychophysical Procedure to Assess Localization Acuity in Toddlers Who Use Bilateral Cochlear Implants , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[84]  R. Litovsky,et al.  The Effect of Interaural Fluctuation Rate on Correlation Change Discrimination , 2014, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[85]  D. Sanes,et al.  Early appearance of inhibitory input to the MNTB supports binaural processing during development. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[86]  A. Dhara Enhancement of signal-to-noise ratio , 1997 .

[87]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Binaural unmasking with multiple adjacent masking electrodes in bilateral cochlear implant users. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[88]  J K Shallop,et al.  Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System. , 1994, The American journal of otology.

[89]  H S Colburn,et al.  Theory of binaural interaction based on auditory-nerve data. II. Detection of tones in noise. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[90]  M. Dorman,et al.  Central auditory development: evidence from CAEP measurements in children fit with cochlear implants. , 2007, Journal of communication disorders.

[91]  G M Clark,et al.  Electrode position, repetition rate, and speech perception by early- and late-deafened cochlear implant patients. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[92]  Alan Kan,et al.  Mapping procedures can produce non-centered auditory images in bilateral cochlear implantees. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[93]  B. Papsin,et al.  Central auditory development after long-term cochlear implant use , 2013, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[94]  Leslie R Bernstein,et al.  Sensitivity to interaural intensitive disparities: listeners' use of potential cues. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[95]  Alan Kan,et al.  Across-frequency combination of interaural time difference in bilateral cochlear implant listeners , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[96]  B. Wright,et al.  Similar patterns of learning and performance variability for human discrimination of interaural time differences at high and low frequencies. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[97]  B. Papsin,et al.  Lateralization of Interimplant Timing and Level Differences in Children Who Use Bilateral Cochlear Implants , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[98]  Eric I. Knudsen,et al.  Adaptive auditory plasticity in developing and adult animals , 2007, Progress in Neurobiology.

[99]  D. McFadden,et al.  Lateralization of high frequencies based on interaural time differences. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[100]  M. Manrique,et al.  Worldwide trends in bilateral cochlear implantation , 2010, The Laryngoscope.

[101]  A. Parkinsonb,et al.  Bilateral cochlear implants in children , 2004 .

[102]  R. Tyler,et al.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[103]  Benedikt Grothe,et al.  Experience-dependent refinement of inhibitory inputs to auditory coincidence-detector neurons , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.