What you learn is more than what you see: what can sequencing effects tell us about inductive category learning?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Gregory Ashby,et al. A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. , 1998, Psychological review.
[2] R. Bjork. Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. , 1994 .
[3] Anderson,et al. LEVv The Effects of Category Generalizations and Instance Similarity on Schema Abstraction , 2022 .
[4] Timothy D. Lee,et al. Contextual interference: Generalizability and limitations , 2012 .
[5] Aaron B. Hoffman,et al. Thirty-something categorization results explained: selective attention, eyetracking, and models of category learning. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[6] Nick Chater,et al. Sequence effects in categorization of simple perceptual stimuli. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[7] Corey J. Bohil,et al. Delayed feedback effects on rule-based and information-integration category learning. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[8] David A. Balota,et al. Expanded vs. Equal Interval Spaced Retrieval Practice: Exploring Different Schedules of Spacing and Retention Interval in Younger and Older Adults , 2008, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.
[9] Edward Vul,et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Spacing Effects in Learning A Temporal Ridgeline of Optimal Retention , 2022 .
[10] Aaron S. Benjamin,et al. What makes distributed practice effective? , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.
[11] Hermann Ebbinghaus (1885). Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology , 2013, Annals of Neurosciences.
[12] W. R. Garner,et al. Concept learning as a function of form of internal structure , 1963 .
[13] Teal S Eich,et al. Spacing as the friend of both memory and induction in young and older adults. , 2010, Psychology and aging.
[14] Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al. Spaced retrieval: absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[15] C. P. Duncan,et al. Human discrimination learning with simultaneous and successive presentation of stimuli. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.
[16] Henry L. Roediger,et al. Is expanding retrieval a superior method for learning text materials? , 2010, Memory & cognition.
[17] S. Hochstein,et al. The development of category learning strategies: What makes the difference? , 2009, Cognition.
[18] Christopher N. Wahlheim,et al. Spacing enhances the learning of natural concepts: an investigation of mechanisms, metacognition, and aging , 2011, Memory & cognition.
[19] Jay Royce Alleman,et al. Effects of massed and distributed practice schedules on trainable mentally retarded in the learning and retention of gross motor skills , 1973 .
[20] Kristine C. Bloom,et al. Effects of Massed and Distributed Practice on the Learning and Retention of Second-Language Vocabulary , 1981 .
[21] Shana K. Carpenter,et al. Enhancing learning and retarding forgetting: Choices and consequences , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[22] John A. Glover,et al. Massed versus distributed repeated reading: A case of forgetting helping recall? , 1990 .
[23] R. C. Honey,et al. Simultaneous presentation of similar stimuli produces perceptual learning in human picture processing. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[24] J. Mumford,et al. Greater Neural Pattern Similarity Across Repetitions Is Associated with Better Memory , 2010, Science.
[25] A. Glenberg. Monotonic and nonmonotonic lag effects in paired-associate and recognition memory paradigms , 1976 .
[26] Katherine A. Rawson,et al. Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory? , 2009 .
[27] Catherine M. Sandhofer,et al. Order of Presentation Effects in Learning Color Categories , 2008 .
[28] Harold Pashler,et al. Optimizing distributed practice: theoretical analysis and practical implications. , 2009, Experimental psychology.
[29] E. F. Maccaslin. Successive and simultaneous discrimination as a function of stimulus-similarity. , 1954, The American journal of psychology.
[30] C I HOVLAND,et al. Concept learning with differing sequences of instances. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.
[31] S. Hochstein,et al. Comparison processes in category learning: From theory to behavior , 2008, Brain Research.
[32] Jennifer S. Burt,et al. Spacing and Induction: Application to Exemplars Presented as Auditory and Visual Text. , 2012 .
[33] Vladimir M Sloutsky,et al. Carrot Eaters or Moving Heads , 2012, Psychological science.
[34] Robert L. Goldstone. Isolated and interrelated concepts , 1996, Memory & cognition.
[35] Xiaojin Zhu,et al. Can semi-supervised learning explain incorrect beliefs about categories? , 2011, Cognition.
[36] Timothy C. Rickard,et al. Spacing and the transition from calculation to retrieval , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[37] Robert L. Goldstone,et al. The benefits of interleaved and blocked study: Different tasks benefit from different schedules of study , 2014, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
[38] R. Nosofsky. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[39] Haley A. Vlach. The Spacing Effect in Children's Generalization of Knowledge: Allowing Children Time to Forget Promotes Their Ability to Learn , 2014 .
[40] Doug Rohrer,et al. The shuffling of mathematics problems improves learning , 2007 .
[41] E. Bjork,et al. Why interleaving enhances inductive learning: The roles of discrimination and retrieval , 2013, Memory & cognition.
[42] H. Ebbinghaus. Memory A Contribution Toexperimental Psychology , 1913 .
[43] H. Pashler,et al. Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.
[44] R. C. Honey,et al. The role of stimulus comparison in human perceptual learning: effects of distractor placement. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[45] Robert L. Goldstone,et al. Sequential similarity and comparison effects in category learning , 2011, CogSci.
[46] R. C. Honey,et al. Perceptual learning in humans: Roles of preexposure schedule, feedback, and discrimination assay , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.
[47] Rubi Hammer,et al. Category learning from equivalence constraints , 2009, Cognitive Processing.
[48] J. S. Burt,et al. The exemplar interleaving effect in inductive learning: Moderation by the difficulty of category discriminations , 2012, Memory & Cognition.
[49] Christopher N. Wahlheim,et al. The role of reminding in the effects of spaced repetitions on cued recall: sufficient but not necessary. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[50] V. Sloutsky. Effects of Training on Category Learning , 2013 .
[51] John Dunlosky,et al. Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology , 2012 .
[52] Robert L. Goldstone,et al. Effects of interleaved and blocked study on delayed test of category learning generalization , 2014, Front. Psychol..
[53] J. J. Donovan,et al. A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: Now you see it, now you don't. , 1999 .
[54] Doug Rohrer,et al. Interleaved Practice Improves Mathematics Learning. , 2014 .
[55] Clara E. Bussenius,et al. Memory : A Contribution to Experimental Psychology , 2017 .
[56] Marcus R. Watson,et al. Extremely selective attention: eye-tracking studies of the dynamic allocation of attention to stimulus features in categorization. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[57] Larry L. Jacoby,et al. The Power of Examples: Illustrative Examples Enhance Conceptual Learning of Declarative Concepts , 2015 .
[58] Doug Rohrer,et al. The effects of interleaved practice , 2010 .
[59] C. Mitchell,et al. Effects of Exposure on Discrimination of Similar Stimuli and on Memory for Their Unique and Common Features , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[60] Robert L. Goldstone,et al. Putting category learning in order: Category structure and temporal arrangement affect the benefit of interleaved over blocked study , 2014, Memory & cognition.
[61] F Gregory Ashby,et al. Initial Training With Difficult Items Facilitates Information Integration, but Not Rule-Based Category Learning , 2008, Psychological science.
[62] J. Kruschke,et al. ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. , 1992, Psychological review.
[63] F. Q. Ribeiro. The meta-analysis , 2017, Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology.
[64] Robert A. Bjork,et al. The spacing effect: Consolidation or differential encoding? , 1970 .
[65] L. Jacoby,et al. When forgetting helps memory: an analysis of repetition effects , 1982 .
[66] Shana K Carpenter,et al. The effects of interleaving versus blocking on foreign language pronunciation learning , 2013, Memory & cognition.
[67] Catherine M. Sandhofer,et al. At the same time or apart in time? The role of presentation timing and retrieval dynamics in generalization. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[68] Chris Janiszewski,et al. A Meta-analysis of the Spacing Effect in Verbal Learning: Implications for Research on Advertising Repetition and Consumer Memory , 2003 .
[69] R. C. Honey,et al. Short Article: Superior Discrimination between Similar Stimuli after Simultaneous Exposure , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[70] A. Latimer,et al. High Levels of Contextual Interference Enhance Handwriting Skill Acquisition , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.
[71] John R. Anderson,et al. The effects of information order and learning mode on schema abstraction , 1984, Memory & cognition.
[72] Brian Ross,et al. Comparisons in Category Learning: How Best to Compare For What , 2011, CogSci.
[73] Shana K. Carpenter,et al. Application of the Testing and Spacing Effects to Name Learning , 2005 .
[74] V. Sloutsky,et al. Induction and categorization in young children: a similarity-based model. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[75] Geoffrey Hall,et al. The intermixed-blocked effect in human perceptual learning is not the consequence of trial spacing. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[76] A. Glenberg,et al. Spacing repetitions over 1 week , 1980, Memory & cognition.
[77] Doug Rohrer,et al. Interleaving Helps Students Distinguish among Similar Concepts , 2012 .
[78] D. Rohrer,et al. The benefit of interleaved mathematics practice is not limited to superficially similar kinds of problems , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[79] Bridgid Finn,et al. Metacognitive judgments of repetition and variability effects in natural concept learning: evidence for variability neglect , 2012, Memory & Cognition.
[80] J. D. Smith,et al. Deferred Feedback Sharply Dissociates Implicit and Explicit Category Learning , 2014, Psychological science.
[81] D. Gentner,et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article STRUCTURAL ALIGNMENT IN COMPARISON: No Difference Without Similarity , 2022 .
[82] R. Bjork,et al. Learning Concepts and Categories , 2008, Psychological science.
[83] L. Lipsitt. Simultaneous and successive discrimination learning in children. , 1961, Child development.
[84] Steven M. Smith,et al. Environmental context and human memory , 1978 .
[85] L. E. Bourne,et al. Surface form and the spacing effect , 1985, Memory & cognition.
[86] Jacob Feldman,et al. A rule-based presentation order facilitates category learning , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[87] Eric S. Lee,et al. The effects of error transformations on classification performance. , 1988 .
[88] B. Ross,et al. Generalizing from the use of earlier examples in problem solving , 1990 .
[89] J. Shea,et al. Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. , 1979 .
[90] Klaus Pohl,et al. Application Testing , 2005, Software Product Line Engineering.
[91] S. Samuels. Effect of Simultaneous Versus Successive Discrimination Training on Paired-Associate Learning. , 1969 .
[92] L. Oakes,et al. A Comparison of Infants' Categorization in Paired and Successive Presentation Familiarization Tasks. , 2005, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.
[93] Winston R. Sieck,et al. Learning myopia: an adaptive recency effect in category learning. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[94] Geoffrey Hall. Perceptual and associative learning , 1991 .
[95] Paulo F. Carvalho,et al. Memory encoding of stimulus features in human perceptual learning , 2012 .
[96] Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen,et al. Spacing and Testing Effects: A Deeply Critical, Lengthy, and At Times Discursive Review of the Literature , 2010 .
[97] B. Ross. Remindings and their effects in learning a cognitive skill , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.
[98] N. Mackintosh,et al. Associative learning and elemental representation: II. Generalization and discrimination , 2002, Animal learning & behavior.
[99] C. L. Hull. Quantitative aspects of evolution of concepts: An experimental study. , 1920 .
[100] D. Medin,et al. SUSTAIN: a network model of category learning. , 2004, Psychological review.
[101] Sean H. K. Kang,et al. Learning Painting Styles: Spacing is Advantageous when it Promotes Discriminative Contrast , 2012 .
[102] Joanna P. Williams,et al. Simultaneous and Successive Discrimination of Similar Letters. , 1971 .
[103] Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al. Problem Order Implications for Learning , 2013, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.