A species‐level model for metabolic scaling of trees II. Testing in a ring‐ and diffuse‐porous species

Summary 1. A 17-parameter ‘species model’ that predicts metabolic scaling from vascular architecture was tested in a diffuse-porous maple (Acer grandidentatum) and a ring-porous oak (Quercus gambelii). Predictions of midday water transport (Q) and its scaling with above-ground mass (M) were compared with empirical measurements. We also tested the assumption that Q was proportional to the biomass growth rate of the shoot (G). 2. Water transport and biomass growth rate were measured on 18 trees per species that spanned a broad range in trunk diameter (4–26 cm). Where possible, the same trees were used for obtaining the 17 model parameters that concern external branching, internal xylem conduit anatomy, and soil-to-canopy sap pressure drop. 3. The model succeeded in predicting the Q by M b scaling exponent, b, being within 8% (maple) and 6% (oak) of measured exponents from sap flow data. In terms of absolute Q, the model was better in maple (16% Q overestimate) than oak (128% overestimate). The overestimation of Q was consistent with the model not accounting for cavitation, which is reportedly more prevalent in oak than in maple at the study site. 4. The modelled and measured Q by M b exponents averaged within 3·6% of the measured G by M b exponents, supporting the assumption that G / Q 1 . The average b exponent was 0·62 ± 0·016 (mean ± SE) across species, rejecting b =0 ·75 for intraspecific scaling. 5. The performance of this species model, both for scaling purposes as well as for predicting rates of water consumption within and between species, argues for its further refinement and wider application in ecology and ecosystem biology.

[1]  Nathan G. Swenson,et al.  A general integrative model for scaling plant growth, carbon flux, and functional trait spectra , 2007, Nature.

[2]  Jehn-Yih Juang,et al.  The relationship between reference canopy conductance and simplified hydraulic architecture , 2009 .

[3]  Mark G. Tjoelker,et al.  Universal scaling of respiratory metabolism, size and nitrogen in plants , 2006, Nature.

[4]  Henry S. Horn.  Twigs, trees, and the dynamics of carbon in the landscape , 2000 .

[5]  J. Sperry,et al.  Rare pits, large vessels and extreme vulnerability to cavitation in a ring-porous tree species. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[6]  Michael G. Ryan,et al.  Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis vary linearly with plant hydraulic conductance in ponderosa pine , 2001 .

[7]  K. Niklas.  The allometry of safety‐factors for plant height , 1994 .

[8]  James H. Brown,et al.  A General Model for the Origin of Allometric Scaling Laws in Biology , 1997, Science.

[9]  Lisa Patrick Bentley,et al.  A species‐level model for metabolic scaling in trees I. Exploring boundaries to scaling space within and across species , 2012 .

[10]  M. Zimmermann,et al.  Trees: Structure and Function. , 1972 .

[11]  M. Westoby,et al.  Bivariate line‐fitting methods for allometry , 2006, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[12]  Maurizio Mencuccini,et al.  The ecological significance of long-distance water transport: short-term regulation, long-term acclimation and the hydraulic costs of stature across plant life forms , 2003 .

[13]  D D Smith,et al.  Hydraulic trade-offs and space filling enable better predictions of vascular structure and function in plants , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  D L T,et al.  Networks with Side Branching in Biology , 1998 .

[15]  D. A. King,et al.  Tree form, height growth, and susceptibility to wind damage in Acer saccharum , 1986 .

[16]  N. Negus,et al.  Red Butte Canyon Research Natural Area: history, flora, geology, climate, and ecology , 1992 .

[17]  K J Niklas,et al.  Invariant scaling relationships for interspecific plant biomass production rates and body size , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Evidence that hydraulic conductance limits photosynthesis in old Pinus ponderosa trees. , 1999, Tree physiology.

[19]  James H. Brown,et al.  Quarter-power allometric scaling in vascular plants: functional basis and ecological consequences , 2000 .

[20]  J. Sperry,et al.  A case-study of water transport in co-occurring ring- versus diffuse-porous trees: contrasts in water-status, conducting capacity, cavitation and vessel refilling. , 2008, Tree physiology.

[21]  A. Granier.  Une nouvelle méthode pour la mesure du flux de sève brute dans le tronc des arbres , 1985 .

[22]  J. Sperry,et al.  Scaling of angiosperm xylem structure with safety and efficiency. , 2006, Tree physiology.

[23]  Lloyd Demetrius,et al.  The origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[24]  James H. Brown,et al.  Allometric scaling of plant energetics and population density , 1998, Nature.

[25]  Frederick C Meinzer,et al.  Safety and efficiency conflicts in hydraulic architecture: scaling from tissues to trees. , 2008, Plant, cell & environment.

[26]  T. McMahon,et al.  Size and Shape in Biology , 1973, Science.

[27]  James H. Brown,et al.  A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems , 1999, Nature.

[28]  Charles A Price,et al.  A general model for allometric covariation in botanical form and function , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.