Management Cybernetics: A New Institutional Framework for Coastal Management

This article analyzes institutional arrangements for the delivery of coastal programs through a new way of thinking about their evolution and structure. The notion of three distinct "dimensions" describing the phases in the evolution of institutional arrangements is introduced. The notion of dimensions is developed from conceptualizing about how institutional arrangements are diagrammed. This allows the visualization of how individual institutions and key stakeholders relate to each other in the delivery of coastal programs, how effective these relationships are, and how their relationships could be redesigned. "Dimensional thinking" enables the re-examination of existing institutional design of coastal programs and how these can evolve to meet the challenges of the new millennium. It is concluded that institutional arrangements have grown from a single dimensional view, where institutions (mainly governmental) delivered programs in isolation, through to the present second dimension where agency programs are managed through coordinating bodies and through coastal management plans. It is argued that a third dimension of institutional arrangements, one that recognizes and embraces the rapid pace of change in this century, will be needed that is aligned by themes rather than by organizational structure. To illustrate a third dimension a visualization tool is developed drawing from management cybernetics. It recognizes the increasing importance of formal and informal networks in relation to traditional modernist hierarchical management by recognizing multiple stakeholders (government at all levels, industry, advocacy groups, conservation interests, and the broader community) and their degree of mutual dependence. Dimensional thinking has the potential to institutionalize the interaction between these multiple stakeholders to ensure the effective delivery of coastal programs in the new millennium. A single answer to what the third dimension of coastal management program evolution should include is not presented. Rather, an approach is presented that allows coastal managers to move forward in the debate on redesigning coastal programs to meet today's complex suite of issues, values, and interests. An experimental case study from Western Australia is used to illustrate the potential application of the dimensional thinking to coastal management institutional design in that State's coastal program.

[1]  M. Callon.  Society in the making: The study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis , 1987 .

[2]  Clive H. Elphick,et al.  Brain of the Firm , 1981 .

[3]  Mik Wisniewski,et al.  Beyond Dispute: The Invention of Team Syntegrity , 1994 .

[4]  Anthony Debons,et al.  The control revolution: Technological and economic origins of the information society , 1990, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[5]  A. Marty.  Getting to YES. Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In , 1983 .

[6]  Nancy C. Roberts,et al.  Public Deliberation: An Alternative Approach to Crafting Policy and Setting Direction. , 1997 .

[7]  Doede Nauta,et al.  meaning of information , 1972 .

[8]  David Osborne,et al.  Banishing Bureaucracy: The Five Strategies for Reinventing Government , 1997 .

[9]  R. Rhodes,et al.  The New Governance: Governing without Government , 1996 .

[10]  Gustavo Stubrich.  The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization , 1993 .

[11]  J. Baldwin.  Bucky works : Buckminster Fuller's ideas for today , 1996 .

[12]  J. Tobey,et al.  A common framework for learning from ICM experience , 1997 .

[13]  Scott T. McCreary,et al.  COASTS Institutional Arrangements for Managing Coastal Resources and Environments , 1990 .

[14]  S. Beer.  The Brain of the Firm , 1972 .

[15]  L. R. Singer.  Settling Disputes: Conflict Resolution In Business, Families, And The Legal System , 1990 .

[16]  A. Goldberg.  General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. , 1969 .

[17]  M. Ruffin.  On being digital. , 1995, Physician executive.

[18]  Allen H. Miller,et al.  Assessing networked coastal zone management programs , 1988 .

[19]  Donald Chisholm,et al.  Coordination Without Hierarchy: Informal Structures in Multiorganizational Systems , 1992 .

[20]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[21]  R. Fisher,et al.  Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving in , 1981 .

[22]  J. Lopreato,et al.  General system theory : foundations, development, applications , 1970 .

[23]  W. Adger,et al.  Pressures, trends, and impacts in coastal zones: Interactions between socioeconomic and natural systems , 1996 .

[24]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930 , 1984 .

[25]  Stafford Beer,et al.  World in Torment: A Time Whose Idea Must Come , 1993 .

[26]  G. Vickers.  The Art of Judgment: A Study of Policy Making , 1995 .

[27]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society , 1984 .

[28]  R. Harding.  Environmental decision-making : the roles of scientists, engineers, and the public , 1998 .

[29]  P. Burbridge,et al.  US lessons for coastal management in the European Union , 2000 .

[30]  Grahame F. Thompson,et al.  Markets, Hierarchies and Networks: The Coordination of Social Life , 1991 .

[31]  James W. Good,et al.  The Effectiveness of Coastal Zone Management in the United States , 1999 .

[32]  A. Grant,et al.  Alternative dispute resolution. , 1995, The Canadian nurse.

[33]  Svein Jentoft,et al.  Fisheries co-management: Delegating government responsibility to fishermen's organizations☆☆☆ , 1989 .