Effect of implant design and endplate preparation on the compressive strength of interbody fusion constructs.

STUDY DESIGN A human cadaveric study on the compressive strength of different lumbar interbody fusion implants and endplate preparation techniques was performed. OBJECTIVES To assess the axial compressive strength of an implant with peripheral endplate contact as opposed to full surface contact, and to assess whether removal of the central bony endplate affects the axial compressive strength. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The compressive strength of interbody fusion constructs has been compared between implants and bone grafts. Neither implant design nor endplate preparation has been shown to affect strength. Removal of the central bony endplate for bone grafts was noted to improve graft incorporation but also to facilitate subsidence. METHODS A total of 44 vertebrae were tested in four experimental groups by combining two interbody implants (full-surface vs peripheral surface support) with two endplate preparation techniques (intact bony endplate vs removal of the central bony endplate). Specimens were tested to ultimate compressive failure using a 50 N/second ramped load. Yield strength and ultimate compressive strength were compared between groups using two-factor analysis of covariance. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Stepwise linear regressions assessed the predictive power of age, bone mineral content, and the implant's normalized endplate coverage on yield strength and ultimate compressive strength. RESULTS Neither implant design nor endplate preparation technique affected yield strength or ultimate compressive strength. Age, bone mineral content, and the normalized endplate coverage were strong predictors of yield strength (P < 0. 0001; r2 = 0.459) and ultimate compressive strength (P < 0.0001; r2 = 0.510). CONCLUSIONS An implant with only peripheral support resting on the apophyseal ring offers axial mechanical strength similar to that of an implant with full support. Neither supplementary struts nor a solid implant face has any additional mechanical advantage, but reduces graft-host contact area. Removal of the central bony endplate is recommended because it does not affect the compressive strength and promotes graft incorporation.

[1]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Human Lumbar Vertebrae: Quantitative Three-Dimensional Anatomy , 1992, Spine.

[2]  R. Watkins,et al.  Comparison of Disc Space Heights after Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion , 1989, Spine.

[3]  N. Yoganandan,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of Thoracolumbar Interbody Constructs: How Important Is the Endplate? , 1996, Spine.

[4]  M. Aebi,et al.  The human lumbar intervertebral disc: evidence for changes in the biosynthesis and denaturation of the extracellular matrix with growth, maturation, ageing, and degeneration. , 1996, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[5]  A. Tencer,et al.  Biomechanical Properties of Threaded Inserts for Lumbar Interbody Spinal Fusion , 1995, Spine.

[6]  W. Hayes,et al.  Prediction of vertebral body compressive fracture using quantitative computed tomography. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  D. R. Sumner,et al.  Biologic issues in lumbar spinal fusion. Introduction. 1995 Focus Issue Meeting on Fusion. , 1995, Spine.

[8]  P. Dolan,et al.  The clinical biomechanics award paper 1993 Posture and the compressive strength of the lumbar spine. , 1994, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  A. Nachemson,et al.  Lumbar intradiscal pressure. Experimental studies on post-mortem material. , 1960, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[10]  G. Friedlaender.  Bone grafts. The basic science rationale for clinical applications. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  JACOB G. EDELSON,et al.  Stages in the Natural History of the Vertebral End-Plates , 1988, Spine.

[12]  T Hansson,et al.  The Relation Between Bone Mineral Content, Experimental Compression Fractures, and Disc Degeneration in Lumbar Vertebrae , 1981, Spine.

[13]  J. R. Parsons,et al.  Mechanics of interbody spinal fusion. Analysis of critical bone graft area. , 1993, Spine.

[14]  J Soini,et al.  Lumbar disc space heights after external fixation and anterior interbody fusion: a prospective 2-year follow-up of clinical and radiographic results. , 1994, Journal of spinal disorders.

[15]  S. L. Griffith,et al.  The Bagby and Kuslich Method of Lumbar Interbody Fusion: History, Techniques, and 2‐Year Follow‐up Results of a United States Prospective, Multicenter Trial , 1998, Spine.

[16]  J. Brantigan,et al.  A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients. , 1993 .

[17]  K. Buehler,et al.  Solitary Lymphangioma of the Spine , 1995, Spine.

[18]  T. Keller,et al.  Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar spine. II. Fatigue strength during dynamic compressive loading , 1987, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[19]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Regional Variations in the Compressive Properties of Lumbar Vertebral Trabeculae: Effects of Disc Degeneration , 1989, Spine.

[20]  B. Cunningham,et al.  Compression strength of donor bone for posterior lumbar interbody fusion. , 1993, Spine.

[21]  J. Evans,et al.  The load bearing capacity of vertebral cancellous bone in interbody fusion of the lumbar spine. , 1983, Engineering in medicine.

[22]  J. Evans.  Biomechanics of lumbar fusion. , 1985, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  C D Ray,et al.  Threaded Titanium Cages for Lumbar Interbody Fusions , 1997, Spine.

[24]  K B Arbogast,et al.  Improved assessment of lumbar vertebral body strength using supine lateral dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[25]  B. Myers,et al.  Strength and Stability of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Titanium Fiber Mesh Implant and Tricortical Bone Graft , 1997, Spine.

[26]  P. A. Cripton,et al.  Compressive strength of interbody cages in the lumbar spine: the effect of cage shape, posterior instrumentation and bone density , 1998, European Spine Journal.

[27]  W C Hutton,et al.  The effect of posture on the role of the apophysial joints in resisting intervertebral compressive forces. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[28]  M. Chapman,et al.  Morbidity at bone graft donor sites. , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.