Application Limits for the Kinematic Wave Approximation

Flows with predominate flow direction are governed by the de Saint Venant flow equations. The kinematic wave approach retains the mass balance but considers pseudo-uniform flow conditions instead of the full momentum balance. This approximation is particularly well-suited for overland runoff processes. The zero-inertia approach may be regarded as an intermediate formulation which retains the effect of surface slope but neglects dynamical flow properties. This investigation considers in detail the differences between the three of the aforementioned approaches under pseudo-steady flow conditions. The result indicates application limits of the two simplified wave theories when compared to the de Saint Venant flow equations and may be regarded as a useful decisive criterion.

[1]  W. Hager OPEN CHANNEL HYDRAULICS OF FLOWS WITH INCREASING DISCHARGE , 1983 .

[2]  David A. Woolhiser,et al.  Unsteady, one‐dimensional flow over a plane—The rising hydrograph , 1967 .

[3]  M. Lighthill,et al.  On kinematic waves I. Flood movement in long rivers , 1955, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[4]  M J Lighthill,et al.  On kinematic waves II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads , 1955, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[5]  P. Weinmann,et al.  Approximate Flood Routing Methods: A Review , 1979 .

[6]  David A. Woolhiser,et al.  Unsteady one‐dimensional flow over a plane: Partial equilibrium and recession hydrographs , 1980 .

[7]  M. Lighthill,et al.  On kinematic waves I. Flood movement in long rivers , 1955, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[8]  Deva K. Borah,et al.  Kinematic wave routing incorporating shock fitting , 1980 .

[9]  Nikolaos D. Katopodes On zero-inertia and kinematic waves , 1984 .

[10]  W. Hager,et al.  Approximate treatment of plane channel flow , 1984 .