Decision Aiding, Not Dispute Resolution: Creating Insights through Structured Environmental Decisions

Public participation in environmental decisions has become commonplace. A favored model for public input is to use the tools of dispute resolution to seek consensus among members of a multi-party stakeholder group. The authors believe that a focus on dispute resolution and consensus building can pose impediments to the creation of insights for decisionmakers and lead to the adoption of inferior policy choices. Instead, they advocate an alternative approach to stakeholder participation characterized as “decision aiding” through a structured process based on constructive, multi-attribute techniques and value-focused thinking. In this paper some of the major difficulties posed by a dispute-resolution approach are articulated, the principles of a decision-aiding process reviewed, and this alternative approach illustrated by describing a stakeholder consultation involving water-use planning for a hydroelectric facility on the Alouette River in British Columbia, Canada. © 2001 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.

[1]  詳子 斎藤,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking の拡張とその応用 , 2003 .

[2]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Using Stakeholder Values to Make Smarter Environmental Decisions , 2000 .

[3]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Democratizing Risk Management: Successful Public Involvement in Local Water Management Decisions , 1999 .

[4]  Cary Coglianese,et al.  The Limits of Consensus: The Environmental Protection System in Transition: Toward a More Desirable Future , 1999 .

[5]  John Bone,et al.  Are Groups More (or Less) Consistent Than Individuals? , 1999 .

[6]  M. Morris.  Understanding Risk - Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1997 .

[7]  Greg Leichty.  The Limits of Collaboration. , 1997 .

[8]  Marc D. Street.  Groupthink , 1997 .

[9]  Richard Gonzalez,et al.  Environmental disputes: Competition for scarce resources and clashing of values , 1997 .

[10]  Thomas Webler.  Organizing Public Participation: A Critical Review of Three Handbooks , 1997 .

[11]  Timothy L. McDaniels,et al.  The structured value referendum: Eliciting preferences for environmental policy alternatives , 1996 .

[12]  G. Cormick,et al.  BUILDING CONSENSUS FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE: PUTTING PRINCIPLES INTO PRACTICE , 1996 .

[13]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1996 .

[14]  Sean A. Spence,et al.  Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain , 1995 .

[15]  R. Gregory,et al.  Creating policy alternatives using stakeholder values , 1994 .

[16]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Valuing environmental resources: A constructive approach , 1993 .

[17]  Bruce Tonn,et al.  STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT: OPEN PROCESSES FOR REACHING DECISIONS ABOUT THE FUTURE USES OF CONTAMINATED SITES FINAL REPORT , 1993 .

[18]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives , 1993 .

[19]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[20]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Name index , 1993 .

[21]  James K. Sebenius,et al.  Negotiation analysis: a characterization and review , 1992 .

[22]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Adapting the environmental impact statement process to inform decision makers , 1992 .

[23]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. , 1992 .

[24]  W. Blatchford,et al.  Getting a yes.... , 1992, Journal of the California Dental Association.

[25]  Daniel J. Fiorino.  Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms , 1990 .

[26]  H. Simon,et al.  Invariants of human behavior. , 1990, Annual review of psychology.

[27]  Ronald A. Howard,et al.  Knowledge Maps , 1989 .

[28]  Ross D. Shachter.  Evaluating Influence Diagrams , 1986, Oper. Res..

[29]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources , 1986 .

[30]  Douglas Muzzio,et al.  Approval Voting , 1978, American Political Science Review.

[31]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Feature Article - Decision Analysis: An Overview , 1982, Oper. Res..

[32]  R. Keeney.  Decision analysis: an overview. , 1982, Operations research.

[33]  R. Zajonc.  Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[34]  J. March.  Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice , 1978 .

[35]  M. Lepper.  Cognition and social behavior. , 1977, Science.

[36]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Cognitive Processes and Societal Risk Taking , 1976 .

[37]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[38]  Social support, dissent and conformity. , 1968, Sociometry.

[39]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational choice and the structure of the environment. , 1956, Psychological review.