The Process of Chinese Manufacturing Upgrading: Transitioning from Unilateral to Recursive Mutual Learning Relations

This article argues that upgrading in China has been a historical success, that upgrading must be seen as a learning process, and that current Chinese upgrading involves a transformation in industrial learning dynamics. During China's initial export-oriented industrialization strategy, indigenous producers successfully upgraded by apprenticing themselves to their foreign customers, and they learned through integration in transnational communities of practice. The success of those initial unilateral learning relations enhanced the sophistication of the Chinese market, both as a community of producers and as a market for manufactured goods. This has generated a new phase of learning-driven upgrading in which Chinese producers and MNC manufacturers both seek to make their Chinese operations more sophisticated. In this new context, apprenticeship disappears and Chinese and foreign players learn from one another. A core claim about the new mutual learning is that it is facilitated by the globalization of formal learning systems, such as corporate production systems (CPSs).

[1]  J. Tremblay Selling To China , 2015 .

[2]  Volker Wittke,et al.  Chapter 3. Governance Architectures for Learning and Self-Recomposition in Chinese Industrial Upgrading , 2014 .

[3]  Ram Mudambi,et al.  Clusters, Connectivity and Catch-up: Bollywood and Bangalore in the Global Economy , 2013 .

[4]  Jiali Lv Run of the Red Queen: Government, Innovation, Globalization, and Economic Growth in China , 2012 .

[5]  Haritha Saranga,et al.  Catch-up strategies in the Indian auto components industry: Domestic firms’ responses to market liberalization , 2012 .

[6]  W. Chu How the Chinese government promoted a global automobile industry , 2011 .

[7]  C. Ansell,et al.  Pragmatist Democracy: Evolutionary Learning as Public Philosophy , 2011 .

[8]  Inge Ivarsson,et al.  Upgrading in global value-chains: a case study of technology-learning among IKEA-suppliers in China and Southeast Asia , 2011 .

[9]  K. Nam Learning through the international joint venture: lessons from the experience of China's automotive sector , 2011 .

[10]  C. Hawes,et al.  The cultural transformation of large Chinese enterprises into internationally competitive corporations: case studies of Haier and Huawei , 2011 .

[11]  Eric Thun,et al.  The Fight for the Middle: Upgrading, Competition, and Industrial Development in China , 2010 .

[12]  Mehdi Shafaeddin,et al.  The evolution of value added in assembly operations: the case of China and Mexico , 2010 .

[13]  Christer Ljungwall,et al.  Is China different? A meta-analysis of the effects of foreign direct investment on domestic firms , 2010 .

[14]  Eric Thun,et al.  The dynamic value of MNE political embeddedness: The case of the Chinese automobile industry , 2010 .

[15]  Manoj K. Malhotra,et al.  Antecedents to supplier integration in the automotive industry: A multiple-case study of foreign subsidiaries in China , 2010 .

[16]  Jason L. Dedrick,et al.  Who Profits from Innovation in Global Value Chains? A Study of the iPod and Notebook PCs , 2010 .

[17]  Rafael A. Corredoira,et al.  Network composition, collaborative ties, and upgrading in emerging-market firms: Lessons from the Argentine autoparts sector , 2010 .

[18]  Barbara Simpson,et al.  Pragmatism, Mead and the Practice Turn , 2009 .

[19]  Lin Lei,et al.  Evolution of the Chinese Automobile Industry from a Sectoral System of Innovation Perspective , 2009 .

[20]  Jean-François Huchet,et al.  Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics , 2009 .

[21]  R. Mudambi Location, Control and Innovation in Knowledge-Intensive Industries , 2008 .

[22]  Sea Jin Chang,et al.  Spillovers and competition among foreign and local firms in China , 2008 .

[23]  P. Nolan,et al.  The Global Business Revolution, the Cascade Effect, and the Challenge for Firms from Developing Countries , 2007 .

[24]  S. Fixson,et al.  The Power of Integrality: Linkages between Product Architecture, Innovation, and Industry Structure , 2007 .

[25]  Eric Thun,et al.  Changing Lanes in China: Foreign Direct Investment, Local Governments, and Auto Sector Development , 2006 .

[26]  Alfred A. Marcus,et al.  EMBEDDED TIES AND THE ACQUISITION OF COMPETITIVE CAPABILITIES , 2005 .

[27]  Dieter Ernst,et al.  Limits to Modularity: Reflections on Recent Developments in Chip Design , 2005 .

[28]  M. R. Di Tommaso,et al.  The case of specialized towns in Guangdong, China , 2005 .

[29]  E. Giuliani,et al.  Upgrading in Global Value Chains: Lessons from Latin American Clusters , 2005 .

[30]  G. Gereffi,et al.  The governance of global value chains , 2005 .

[31]  Charles F. Sabel,et al.  Neither Modularity nor Relational Contracting: Inter-Firm Collaboration in the New Economy , 2004, Enterprise & Society.

[32]  R. Florida,et al.  3. Globalization, Deverticalization, and Employment in the Motor Vehicle Industry , 2003, Locating Global Advantage.

[33]  J. Humphrey,et al.  The Global Automotive Industry Value Chain: What Prospects for Upgrading by Developing Countries , 2003 .

[34]  Bente Elkjaer Organizational learning with a pragmatic slant , 2003 .

[35]  Brian Uzzi,et al.  Relational Embeddedness and Learning: The Case of Bank Loan Managers and Their Clients , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[36]  Timothy J. Sturgeon,et al.  Modular production networks: a new American model of industrial organization , 2002 .

[37]  Yingyi Qian,et al.  How Reform Worked in China , 2002 .

[38]  S. Winter,et al.  Replication as Strategy , 2001 .

[39]  Frank Blackler,et al.  Power, mastery and organizational learning. , 2000 .

[40]  F. Lemoine FDI and the Opening Up of China's Economy , 2000 .

[41]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The determinants of trust in supplier–automaker relationships in the US, Japan, and Korea , 2000 .

[42]  R. Gulati,et al.  Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: strategic networks , 2000 .

[43]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  The Evolution of a Manufacturing System at Toyota , 1999 .

[44]  A. Georges L. Romme,et al.  Organizational Learning, Circularity and Double-Linking , 1997 .

[45]  Georges Romme,et al.  Making organizational learning work: Consent and double linking between circles , 1996 .

[46]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[47]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[48]  Gary Herrigel,et al.  Manufacturing Possibilities: Creative Action and Industrial Recomposition , 2011 .

[49]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[50]  D. Ernst,et al.  Beyond the ‘ Global Factory ’ model : innovative capabilities for upgrading China ’ s IT Industry , 2007 .

[51]  Bente Elkjaer,et al.  Towards a Pragmatic theory of creative practice , 2006 .

[52]  Charles F. Sabel,et al.  A Real-Time Revolution in Routines , 2005 .

[53]  K. Bronfenbrenner,et al.  The Changing Nature of Corporate Global Restructuring: The Impact of Production Shifts on Jobs in the US, China, and Around the Globe , 2004 .

[54]  R. Lester,et al.  The New Global Supply-Base: New Challenges for Local Suppliers in East Asia , 2003 .

[55]  Nan Lin,et al.  Social Capital: Theories of Capital , 2001 .

[56]  Wujin Chu,et al.  The Determinants of Trust in Supplier-Automaker Relationships in the U.S., Japan and Korea , 2000 .

[57]  R. Gulati,et al.  STRATEGIC NETWORKS , 2000 .

[58]  藤本 隆宏,et al.  The evolution of a manufacturing system at Toyota , 1999 .

[59]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[60]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[61]  E. Presseisen Germany and Japan , 1958 .