Spaces of open-source politics: Physical and digital conditions for political organization

The recent proliferation of Web 2.0 applications and their role in contemporary political life have inspired the coining of the term ‘open-source politics’. This article analyzes how open-source politics is organized in the case of a radical political party in Denmark called The Alternative. Inspired by the literature on organizational space, the analysis explores how different organizational spaces configure the party’s process of policy development, thereby adding to our understanding of the relationship between organizational space and political organization. We analyze three different spaces constructed by The Alternative as techniques for practicing open-source politics and observe that physical and digital spaces create an oscillation between openness and closure. In turn, this oscillation produces a dialectical relationship between practices of imagination and affirmation. Curiously, it seems that physical spaces open up the political process, while digital spaces close it down by fixing meaning. Accordingly, we argue that open-source politics should not be equated with online politics but may be highly dependent on physical spaces. Furthermore, digital spaces may provide both closure and disconnection between a party’s universal body and its particular body. In conclusion, however, we propose that such a disconnection might be a precondition for success when institutionalizing radical politics, as it allows parties like The Alternative to maintain their universal appeal.

[1]  S. Tormey,et al.  the end of representative politics? , 2015 .

[2]  Anne-Laure Fayard,et al.  Affordances for practice , 2014, Inf. Organ..

[3]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The cathedral and the bazaar - musings on Linux and Open Source by an accidental revolutionary , 2001 .

[4]  Torkild Thanem All talk and no movement? Homeless coping and resistance to urban planning , 2012 .

[5]  J. Dean Crowds and Party , 2016 .

[6]  S. Žižek,et al.  Why do empty signifiers matter to politicians , 2003 .

[7]  K. Dale,et al.  Building a Social Materiality: Spatial and Embodied Politics in Organizational Control , 2005 .

[8]  S. Clegg,et al.  Space, Organizations and Management Theory , 2006 .

[9]  Carlo Ratti,et al.  Open Source Architecture , 2015 .

[10]  E. Husted,et al.  The Alternative to Occupy: Radical Politics Between Protest and Parliament , 2017 .

[11]  Julie Graham,et al.  A Postcapitalist Politics , 2006 .

[12]  A. Spicer,et al.  ‘Leader, you first’: The everyday production of hierarchical space in a Chinese bureaucracy , 2014 .

[13]  Martin Kornberger,et al.  Learning/Becoming/Organizing , 2005 .

[14]  Craig Gingrich‐Philbrook Manifesto , 2017 .

[15]  E. Husted From Creation to Amplification: Occupy Wall Street’s Transition into an Online Populist Movement , 2015 .

[16]  Daniel Trottier,et al.  Open source intelligence, social media and law enforcement: Visions, constraints and critiques , 2015 .

[17]  Sheena J. Vachhani,et al.  Thinking critically about affect in organization studies: Why it matters , 2017 .

[18]  Val Kinjerski,et al.  Creating organizational conditions that foster employee spirit at work , 2006 .

[19]  J. MacLaughlin Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory , 1994 .

[20]  E. Laclau Democracy and the Question of Power , 2001 .

[21]  S. Halford ‘Towards a Sociology of Organizational Space’ , 2004 .

[22]  I. Munro,et al.  ‘Living Space’ at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe: Spatial tactics and the politics of smooth space , 2013 .

[23]  N. Thrift Environment and Planning D: Society and Space , 1995 .

[24]  Richard M. Stallman,et al.  Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman , 2009 .

[25]  K. K. Misra Contemporary political theory , 1983 .

[26]  S. Lewis,et al.  Open source and journalism: toward new frameworks for imagining news innovation , 2013 .

[27]  Andrea Zeffiro Network Culture: Politics for the Information Age , 2006 .

[28]  D. Karpf Open Source Political Community Development: A Five-Stage Adoption Process , 2011 .

[29]  Susan Halford,et al.  Place, Space and Time: Contextualizing Workplace Subjectivities , 2006 .

[30]  D. Jorgensen Participant Observation: A Methodology for Human Studies , 1989 .

[31]  C. Mouffe ThePolitical , 2019, The Licit Life of Capitalism.

[32]  B. Flyvbjerg Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[33]  Henri Lefebvre,et al.  REFLECTIONS ON THE POLITICS OF SPACE , 1976 .

[34]  Steven Weber,et al.  The Success of Open Source , 2004 .

[35]  David M. Berry,et al.  Copy, Rip, Burn: The Politics of Copyleft and Open Source , 2008 .

[36]  Scott Taylor,et al.  Time for Space: A Narrative Review of Research on Organizational Spaces , 2007 .

[37]  E. Laclau On Populist Reason , 2005 .

[38]  E. Laclau Universalism, Particularism, and the Question of Identity , 1992 .

[39]  C. Borch Organizational Atmospheres: Foam, Affect and Architecture , 2010 .

[40]  Chris Baldry,et al.  `Space - The Final Frontier' , 1999 .

[41]  Nathalie Karagiannis,et al.  Imagination and Tragic Democracy , 2012 .

[42]  G. Burrell,et al.  The Spaces of Organisation and the Organisation of Space , 2007 .

[43]  S. Clegg,et al.  Bringing Space Back in: Organizing the Generative Building , 2004 .

[44]  Adrian Carr,et al.  Space and time in organizational change management , 2006 .

[45]  L. Krauss Space, the final frontier? , 2009, Scientific American.

[46]  D. Curtis,et al.  World in Fragments: Writings on Politics, Society, Psychoanalysis, and the Imagination , 1997 .

[47]  David M. Smith For Space , 2006, Ordinary Blessings.

[48]  Bev Skeggs,et al.  The Politics of Imagination: Keeping Open and Critical , 2011 .

[49]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[50]  C. D. Cock,et al.  For a Critical Creativity: The Radical Imagination of Cornelius Castoriadis , 2013 .

[51]  Julie E. Cohen Cyberspace As/And Space , 2006 .

[52]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[53]  Patrick Dunleavy,et al.  New public management is dead. Long live digital-era governance , 2005 .

[54]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The Cathedral and the Bazaar , 2000 .

[55]  George Kokkinidis Spaces of possibilities: workers’ self-management in Greece , 2015 .

[56]  Charles S. Englehardt,et al.  Creating an Organizational Space for Learning. , 2002 .

[57]  Daniel Kreiss Open Source as Practice and Ideology: The Origin of Howard Dean's Innovations in Electoral Politics , 2011 .

[58]  Paul Mason,et al.  PostCapitalism: A Guide to Our Future , 2015 .

[59]  J. Wilkinson Feeling an emotion , 1998 .

[60]  François-Xavier de Vaujany,et al.  If These Walls Could Talk: The Mutual Construction of Organizational Space and Legitimacy , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[61]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[62]  Tobias Olsson,et al.  From Pirates to Politicians : The Story of the Swedish File Sharers who Became a Political Party , 2008 .

[63]  David Lazer,et al.  Governance and Information Technology: From Electronic Government to Information Government , 2007 .

[64]  Ranko L. Lojić,et al.  Organizational change management , 2011 .

[65]  Mathias Klang Free software and open source: The freedom debate and its consequences , 2005, First Monday.

[66]  Niels Åkerstrøm Andersen,et al.  Power at Play: The Relationships between Play, Work and Governance , 2009 .

[67]  N. Andersen Power at Play , 2009 .

[68]  M. Castells Communication Power: Mass Communication, Mass Self-Communication and Power Relationships in the Network Society , 2009, Media and Society.

[69]  Gail Whiteman,et al.  Future imaginings: organizing in response to climate change , 2013 .

[70]  Axel Bruns,et al.  The Future Is User-Led: The Path towards Widespread Produsage , 2007 .

[71]  Lucy E Bailey Refracted Selves? A Study of Changes in Self-Identity in the Transition to Motherhood , 1999 .

[72]  Chris Steyaert,et al.  Spacing organization: non-representational theory and performing organizational space , 2012 .

[73]  A. Komporozos-Athanasiou,et al.  A Theory of Imagination for Organization Studies Using the Work of Cornelius Castoriadis , 2015 .

[74]  R. Wilton,et al.  Toward an Understanding of the Spatiality of Social Movements: Labor Organizing at a Private University in Los Angeles , 2002 .

[75]  M. Paul to our Future, London: Allen Lane. , 2015 .

[76]  K. Weick Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems , 1976, Gestión y Estrategia.

[77]  J. Mattes,et al.  The spatiality of trust: Factors influencing the creation of trust and the role of face-to-face contacts , 2015 .

[78]  Simon Sheikh The Production of Space , 1996 .

[79]  Ernesto Laclau,et al.  New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time , 1990 .

[80]  Brian Thomas Carroll,et al.  Open Source Architecture , 2007 .

[81]  Anne-Laure Fayard Space Matters, But How? , 2012 .

[82]  Lasse Thomassen,et al.  Political theory in the square: Protest, representation and subjectification , 2013 .

[83]  D. Hjorth Creating space for play/invention – concepts of space and organizational entrepreneurship , 2004 .

[84]  Clay Shirky,et al.  Here comes everybody , 2009 .

[85]  A. Ku Remaking Places and Fashioning an Opposition Discourse: Struggle over the Star Ferry Pier and the Queen's Pier in Hong Kong , 2012 .

[86]  M Linder Tia,et al.  Organization Chart , 2014, Definitions.

[87]  D. Koepsell Back to Basics: How Technology and the Open Source Movement Can Save Science , 2010 .

[88]  T. Hernes The Spatial Construction of Organization , 2004 .

[89]  P. Leonardi,et al.  Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World , 2013 .