A Non-Deterministic Approach to Concept Selection Using S-Pareto Frontiers

The most significant design decisions are typically made during the conceptual phase of the engineering design process, when critical design features are proposed, evaluated and selected. In this paper, we explore the critical task of concept selection and propose a non-deterministic, optimization-based approach for selecting the most promising concept. The method presented in this paper builds upon the recently-proposed s-Pareto based concept selection approach. Within the framework of the s-Pareto approach, so-called s-Pareto frontiers are obtained by using the definition of Pareto optimality to identify Pareto optimal solutions that pertain to a set of distinct concepts. These s-Pareto frontiers are used to assess the tradeoffs between various proposed concepts during conceptual design. The s-Pareto approach is a marked departure from traditional concept selection methods and from the traditional use of Pareto frontiers. In this work the s-Pareto approach is extended to include uncertainties caused by stochastic design parameters as well as low model fidelity. More specifically, the reliability of design decisions is accounted for in the decision-making process. Two approaches are presented for performing non-deterministic concept selection. Two examples are given that support the approach.Copyright © 2002 by ASME

[1]  Eric T. Martin,et al.  A MULTIOBJECTIVE INVESTIGATION OF 50-SEAT COMMUTER AIRCRAFT USING A GENETIC ALGORITHM , 2001 .

[2]  H. Li,et al.  Product Design Selection Under Uncertainty and With Competitive Advantage , 2000 .

[3]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization of Large-Scale Structures , 1993 .

[4]  Achille Messac,et al.  Effective Generation of the Pareto Frontier: The Normalized Normal Constraint Method , 2002 .

[5]  Patrick N. Koch,et al.  PROBABILISTIC DESIGN: OPTIMIZING FOR SIX SIGMA QUALITY , 2002 .

[6]  Carl D. Sorensen,et al.  A general approach for robust optimal design , 1993 .

[7]  Juite Wang,et al.  Ranking engineering design concepts using a fuzzy outranking preference model , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[8]  William A. Crossley,et al.  Conceptual design of helicopters via genetic algorithm , 1996 .

[9]  Wei Chen,et al.  Exploration of the effectiveness of physical programming in robust design , 2000 .

[10]  Bradley S. Homann,et al.  Precision machine design assistant: A constraint-based tool for the design and evaluation of precision machine tool concepts , 1998, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[11]  Srinivas Kodiyalam,et al.  Structural optimization using probabilistic constraints , 1991 .

[12]  A. Messac,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A PARETO-BASED CONCEPT SELECTION METHOD , 2002 .

[13]  Todd Mosher,et al.  Conceptual Spacecraft Design Using a Genetic Algorithm Trade Selection Process , 1999 .

[14]  Wei Chen,et al.  Methodology for Managing the Effect of Uncertainty in Simulation-Based Design , 2000 .

[15]  A. Ismail-Yahaya,et al.  Effective generation of the Pareto frontier using the Normal Constraint method , 2002 .

[16]  Richard Butler,et al.  Comparison of Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Codes for Conceptual and Preliminary Wing Design , 1999 .

[17]  R. K. Pant,et al.  Economic Parameters in the Conceptual Design Optimization of an Air-Taxi Aircraft , 1995 .

[18]  Achille Messac,et al.  Physical programming - Effective optimization for computational design , 1996 .

[19]  A. Messac,et al.  Generating Well-Distributed Sets of Pareto Points for Engineering Design Using Physical Programming , 2002 .

[20]  C A Cornell,et al.  A PROBABILITY BASED STRUCTURAL CODE , 1969 .

[21]  John R. Olds,et al.  Multidisciplinary Conceptual Design Optimization of Space Transportation Systems , 1999 .

[22]  Genichi Taguchi,et al.  Taguchi on Robust Technology Development: Bringing Quality Engineering Upstream , 1992 .

[23]  J. Dennis,et al.  A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems , 1997 .

[24]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Nonlinear multiobjective optimization , 1998, International series in operations research and management science.

[25]  Jian Su,et al.  Automatic Differentiation in Robust Optimization , 1997 .

[26]  J. Dennis,et al.  NORMAL-BOUNDARY INTERSECTION: AN ALTERNATE METHOD FOR GENERATING PARETO OPTIMAL POINTS IN MULTICRITERIA OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS , 1996 .

[27]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Measurement methods for product evaluation , 1995 .

[28]  Wei Chen,et al.  Quality utility : a Compromise Programming approach to robust design , 1999 .

[29]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Metrics for Assessing Design Freedom and Information Certainty in the Early Stages of Design , 1998 .

[30]  A. Messac,et al.  Required Relationship Between Objective Function and Pareto Frontier Orders: Practical Implications , 2001 .