Context and History: the Cat's cradle network.

The issue of context has long troubled the endeavour of modelling and representing knowledge, and today is central to the effective management of digital assets. The deep semantics associated with usage of particular digitised artefacts must be represented to a degree sufficient to avoid intentional or unintentional misrepresentation through the repurposing enabled by digital technologies. Any representational issue of relating context to digital objects involves linking in some form, and the assumptions about how linking occurs determines implementation strategy. We describe four models that may be distinguished in approaching implementations of linked documents: the causal, the associative or attributive, the purposive (usage based) and the communal, and contend that most, if not all, current knowledge modelling schemes can in principle be shown to reduce to a formal equivalence of one or other of these. We argue that the communal model is the candidate most likely to provide satisfactory contextualisation, and that an historically contextualised network of communally grounded linkages provides the most adequate mechanism for modelling knowledge provenance. We propose the concept of the ‘cat’s cradle network’ as a model for such an historicised contextualising network.

[1]  Mark A. Gluck,et al.  Information, Uncertainty and the Utility of Categories , 1985 .

[2]  John G. Gammack,et al.  An Approach to Managing Repurposing of Digitised Knowledge Assets , 2001, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[3]  L. Barsalou Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[4]  L. Wittgenstein Philosophical investigations = Philosophische Untersuchungen , 1958 .

[5]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[7]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[8]  Francis T. Durso,et al.  Graphs in the social and psychological sciences: empirical contributions of pathfinder , 1990 .

[9]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Concepts and meaning , 1993 .

[10]  M. Belenky Women's Ways Of Knowing , 1986 .

[11]  Ramanathan V. Guha,et al.  CYC: A Midterm Report , 1990, AI Mag..

[12]  Roger W. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Pathfinder associative networks: studies in knowledge organization , 1990 .

[13]  D. Smith,et al.  Hypertext , 1994 .

[14]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  KRL: Another Perspective , 1979, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations , 2000 .

[16]  M. Polanyi Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[17]  Peter P. Chen ER Model, XML and the Web , 1999, ER.