Laser‐driven radiation: Biomarkers for molecular imaging of high dose‐rate effects

Recently developed short‐pulsed laser sources garner high dose‐rate beams such as energetic ions and electrons, x rays, and gamma rays. The biological effects of laser‐generated ion beams observed in recent studies are different from those triggered by radiation generated using classical accelerators or sources, and this difference can be used to develop new strategies for cancer radiotherapy. High‐power lasers can now deliver particles in doses of up to several Gy within nanoseconds. The fast interaction of laser‐generated particles with cells alters cell viability via distinct molecular pathways compared to traditional, prolonged radiation exposure. The emerging consensus of recent literature is that the differences are due to the timescales on which reactive molecules are generated and persist, in various forms. Suitable molecular markers have to be adopted to monitor radiation effects, addressing relevant endogenous molecules that are accessible for investigation by noninvasive procedures and enable translation to clinical imaging. High sensitivity has to be attained for imaging molecular biomarkers in cells and in vivo to follow radiation‐induced functional changes. Signal‐enhanced MRI biomarkers enriched with stable magnetic nuclear isotopes can be used to monitor radiation effects, as demonstrated recently by the use of dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) for biomolecular observations in vivo. In this context, nanoparticles can also be used as radiation enhancers or biomarker carriers. The radiobiology‐relevant features of high dose‐rate secondary radiation generated using high‐power lasers and the importance of noninvasive biomarkers for real‐time monitoring the biological effects of radiation early on during radiation pulse sequences are discussed.

[1]  A. Cuadrado,et al.  Emerging Therapeutic Targets in Oncologic Photodynamic Therapy. , 2019, Current pharmaceutical design.

[2]  Christoffer Laustsen,et al.  Hyperpolarized 13C MRI: Path to Clinical Translation in Oncology , 2018, Neoplasia.

[3]  Adina Coroabă,et al.  Hyperpolarised NMR to follow water proton transport through membrane channels via exchange with biomolecules. , 2018, Faraday discussions.

[4]  Raffaele Palmirotta,et al.  Liquid biopsy of cancer: a multimodal diagnostic tool in clinical oncology , 2018, Therapeutic advances in medical oncology.

[5]  Kyle M. L. Jones,et al.  Emerging Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologies for Radiation Therapy Planning and Response Assessment. , 2018, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  J. Bourhis,et al.  The Advantage of FLASH Radiotherapy Confirmed in Mini-pig and Cat-cancer Patients , 2018, Clinical Cancer Research.

[7]  S. V. Bulanov,et al.  ELIMAIA: A Laser-Driven Ion Accelerator for Multidisciplinary Applications , 2018 .

[8]  E. Guney,et al.  Transcription Factor NRF2 as a Therapeutic Target for Chronic Diseases: A Systems Medicine Approach , 2018, Pharmacological Reviews.

[9]  F. Stossi,et al.  Cisplatin generates oxidative stress which is accompanied by rapid shifts in central carbon metabolism , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[10]  D Neely,et al.  Near-100 MeV protons via a laser-driven transparency-enhanced hybrid acceleration scheme , 2018, Nature Communications.

[11]  P. McKenna,et al.  Polarization Dependence of Bulk Ion Acceleration from Ultrathin Foils Irradiated by High-Intensity Ultrashort Laser Pulses. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[12]  Stuart Crozier,et al.  Future of medical physics: Real‐time MRI‐guided proton therapy , 2017, Medical physics.

[13]  Dong-Sheng Huang,et al.  Molecular Imaging of Cancer with Nanoparticle-Based Theranostic Probes , 2017, Contrast media & molecular imaging.

[14]  M. Kuo,et al.  Improving radiotherapy in cancer treatment: Promises and challenges , 2017, Oncotarget.

[15]  B. Tavitian,et al.  Pyruvate cellular uptake and enzymatic conversion probed by dissolution DNP‐NMR: the impact of overexpressed membrane transporters , 2017, Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC.

[16]  Claude Bailat,et al.  Irradiation in a flash: Unique sparing of memory in mice after whole brain irradiation with dose rates above 100Gy/s. , 2017, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[17]  J. Bibault,et al.  The role of Next-Generation Sequencing in tumoral radiosensitivity prediction , 2017, Clinical and translational radiation oncology.

[18]  Trevor J Pugh,et al.  Integration of Technical, Bioinformatic, and Variant Assessment Approaches in the Validation of a Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Panel for Myeloid Malignancies. , 2017, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[19]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Investigation of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins through Exchange with Hyperpolarized Water. , 2017, Angewandte Chemie.

[20]  P. Dayton,et al.  Enhancing Nanoparticle Accumulation and Retention in Desmoplastic Tumors via Vascular Disruption for Internal Radiation Therapy , 2017, Theranostics.

[21]  C. Laustsen,et al.  Imaging oxygen metabolism with hyperpolarized magnetic resonance: a novel approach for the examination of cardiac and renal function , 2016, Bioscience reports.

[22]  N. Mason,et al.  Gold nanoparticles for cancer radiotherapy: a review , 2016, Cancer Nanotechnology.

[23]  G. Iliakis,et al.  Ultra-short laser-accelerated proton pulses have similar DNA-damaging effectiveness but produce less immediate nitroxidative stress than conventional proton beams , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[24]  A. van den Berg,et al.  Ultrasensitive DNA detection based on two-step quantitative amplification on magnetic nanoparticles , 2016, Nanotechnology.

[25]  Leonard Wee,et al.  Feasibility of MRI-only treatment planning for proton therapy in brain and prostate cancers: Dose calculation accuracy in substitute CT images. , 2016, Medical physics.

[26]  H. Shukla Novel Genomics and Proteomics Based Biomarkers to Predict Radiation Response and Normal Radiotoxicity in Cancer Patients for Personalized Medicine , 2016 .

[27]  Daniele Panetta,et al.  Radiobiological Effectiveness of Ultrashort Laser-Driven Electron Bunches: Micronucleus Frequency, Telomere Shortening and Cell Viability , 2016, Radiation Research.

[28]  Tae Moon Jeong,et al.  Radiation pressure acceleration of protons to 93 MeV with circularly polarized petawatt laser pulses , 2016 .

[29]  S. Kar,et al.  Materials in extreme environments for energy, accelerators and space applications at ELI-NP. , 2016 .

[30]  F. Gobet,et al.  Laser driven nuclear physics at ELI-NP , 2016, 2201.01068.

[31]  S. Gambhir,et al.  Tumor Molecular Imaging with Nanoparticles , 2016 .

[32]  K. Vallis,et al.  EGF-coated gold nanoparticles provide an efficient nano-scale delivery system for the molecular radiotherapy of EGFR-positive cancer , 2016, International journal of radiation biology.

[33]  Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI detects acute radiotherapy-induced alterations in mandibular microvasculature: prospective assessment of imaging biomarkers of normal tissue injury , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[34]  F. Hyodo,et al.  Dynamic nuclear polarization-magnetic resonance imaging at low ESR irradiation frequency for ascorbyl free radicals , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[35]  Marc S Ramirez,et al.  Kinetic Modeling and Constrained Reconstruction of Hyperpolarized [1-13C]-Pyruvate Offers Improved Metabolic Imaging of Tumors. , 2015, Cancer research.

[36]  W. Weichert,et al.  Next-generation sequencing: hype and hope for development of personalized radiation therapy? , 2015, Radiation oncology.

[37]  C. Fuller,et al.  Metabolic Imaging as a Biomarker of Early Radiation Response in Tumors , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[38]  O. Desouky,et al.  Targeted and non-targeted effects of ionizing radiation , 2015 .

[39]  James B. Mitchell,et al.  13C-MR Spectroscopic Imaging with Hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate Detects Early Response to Radiotherapy in SCC Tumors and HT-29 Tumors , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[40]  M. Krause,et al.  Comparison study of in vivo dose response to laser-driven versus conventional electron beam , 2015, Radiation and Environmental Biophysics.

[41]  P. Vasos,et al.  Long-lived coherences: improved dispersion in the frequency domain using continuous-wave and reduced-power windowed sustaining irradiation. , 2014, The Journal of chemical physics.

[42]  Philippe Hupé,et al.  Ultrahigh dose-rate FLASH irradiation increases the differential response between normal and tumor tissue in mice , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[43]  N. Bansal,et al.  Effects of ionizing radiation on biological molecules--mechanisms of damage and emerging methods of detection. , 2014, Antioxidants & redox signaling.

[44]  N. Chandel,et al.  ROS Function in Redox Signaling and Oxidative Stress , 2014, Current Biology.

[45]  Mechthild Krause,et al.  Establishment of a small animal tumour model for in vivo studies with low energy laser accelerated particles , 2014, Radiation oncology.

[46]  R. Hertenberger,et al.  The Effects of Ultra-High Dose Rate Proton Irradiation on Growth Delay in the Treatment of Human Tumor Xenografts in Nude Mice , 2014, Radiation research.

[47]  Albert P. Chen,et al.  Mapping metabolic changes associated with early Radiation Induced Lung Injury post conformal radiotherapy using hyperpolarized ¹³C-pyruvate Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging. , 2014, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[48]  L. Court,et al.  Evaluation of Hyperpolarized [1-13C]-Pyruvate by Magnetic Resonance to Detect Ionizing Radiation Effects in Real Time , 2014, PloS one.

[49]  L. Frydman,et al.  On the potential of hyperpolarized water in biomolecular NMR studies. , 2014, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[50]  M. Barton,et al.  The Potential for an Enhanced Role for MRI in Radiation-therapy Treatment Planning , 2013, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[51]  S. Anant,et al.  Nanoparticles in radiation therapy: a summary of various approaches to enhance radiosensitization in cancer , 2013 .

[52]  T. Scholl,et al.  Detection of radiation‐induced lung injury using hyperpolarized 13C magnetic resonance spectroscopy and imaging , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[53]  P. Larson,et al.  Metabolic Imaging of Patients with Prostate Cancer Using Hyperpolarized [1-13C]Pyruvate , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[54]  Naomi R. Wray,et al.  Assessment of Response to Lithium Maintenance Treatment in Bipolar Disorder: A Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLiGen) Report , 2013, PloS one.

[55]  Albert P. Chen,et al.  Probing Early Tumor Response to Radiation Therapy Using Hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate in MDA-MB-231 Xenografts , 2013, PloS one.

[56]  A. Tsourkas,et al.  Gd-based macromolecules and nanoparticles as magnetic resonance contrast agents for molecular imaging. , 2013, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[57]  M. Molls,et al.  Low LET protons focused to submicrometer shows enhanced radiobiological effectiveness , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[58]  Jan J Wilkens,et al.  Laser-driven beam lines for delivering intensity modulated radiation therapy with particle beams , 2012, Journal of biophotonics.

[59]  Wolfgang Enghardt,et al.  Radiobiological effectiveness of laser accelerated electrons in comparison to electron beams from a conventional linear accelerator. , 2012, Journal of radiation research.

[60]  B Vojnovic,et al.  Revisiting the ultra-high dose rate effect: implications for charged particle radiotherapy using protons and light ions. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[61]  T. Finkel From Sulfenylation to Sulfhydration: What a Thiolate Needs to Tolerate , 2012, Science Signaling.

[62]  A. Moore,et al.  Magnetic Nanoparticles for Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy , 2012, Pharmaceutical Research.

[63]  T. Teshima,et al.  Measurement of DNA Double-Strand Break Yield in Human Cancer Cells by High-Current, Short-Duration Bunches of Laser-Accelerated Protons , 2011 .

[64]  J Fan,et al.  Linear energy transfer of proton clusters , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[65]  S. Tyldesley,et al.  Estimating the need for radiotherapy for patients with prostate, breast, and lung cancers: verification of model estimates of need with radiotherapy utilization data from British Columbia. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[66]  John Kurhanewicz,et al.  Analysis of cancer metabolism by imaging hyperpolarized nuclei: prospects for translation to clinical research. , 2011, Neoplasia.

[67]  James B. Mitchell,et al.  Detecting response of rat C6 glioma tumors to radiotherapy using hyperpolarized [1‐13C]pyruvate and 13C magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[68]  V Malka,et al.  Exploring ultrashort high-energy electron-induced damage in human carcinoma cells , 2010, Cell Death and Disease.

[69]  G. Mills,et al.  Future of personalized medicine in oncology: a systems biology approach. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[70]  M. Molls,et al.  Relative biological effectiveness of pulsed and continuous 20 MeV protons for micronucleus induction in 3D human reconstructed skin tissue. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[71]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Long-lived states to sustain hyperpolarized magnetization , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[72]  A. Friedl,et al.  No Evidence for a Different RBE between Pulsed and Continuous 20 MeV Protons , 2009, Radiation research.

[73]  D Kiefer,et al.  Radiation-pressure acceleration of ion beams driven by circularly polarized laser pulses. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[74]  B. Yeap,et al.  Phase II study of high-dose photon/proton radiotherapy in the management of spine sarcomas. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[75]  M Borghesi,et al.  Stable GeV ion-beam acceleration from thin foils by circularly polarized laser pulses. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[76]  M. Frommer,et al.  Role of radiotherapy in cancer control in low-income and middle-income countries. , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.

[77]  Emanuel F Petricoin,et al.  Nanoparticles: potential biomarker harvesters. , 2006, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[78]  Geoff Delaney,et al.  The role of radiotherapy in cancer treatment , 2005, Cancer.

[79]  M Borghesi,et al.  Highly efficient relativistic-ion generation in the laser-piston regime. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[80]  J. Ardenkjær-Larsen,et al.  Increase in signal-to-noise ratio of > 10,000 times in liquid-state NMR , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[81]  E. Blakely,et al.  Sequential exposures of mammalian cells to low- and high-LET radiations. II. As a function of cell-cycle stages. , 1988, Radiation research.

[82]  Gerard Mourou,et al.  Compression of amplified chirped optical pulses , 1985 .

[83]  L. Minafra,et al.  Radiation Therapy Towards Laser-Driven Particle Beams: An “OMICS” Approach in Radiobiology , 2016 .

[84]  Antonio Giulietti,et al.  Laser-Driven Particle Acceleration Towards Radiobiology and Medicine , 2016 .

[85]  Antonio Giulietti,et al.  Lasers Offer New Tools to Radiobiology and Radiotherapy , 2016 .

[86]  P. Jha,et al.  Cancer: Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 3) , 2015 .

[87]  Toshiki Tajima,et al.  Laser Acceleration of Ions for Radiation Therapy , 2009 .

[88]  G. Manda,et al.  Reactive Oxygen Species, Cancer and Anti-Cancer Therapies , 2009 .

[89]  P. Vasos,et al.  Singlet states open the way to longer time‐scales in the measurement of diffusion by NMR spectroscopy , 2008 .

[90]  J. L. Evia,et al.  An Impact Evaluation of Education, Health, and Water Supply Investments by the Bolivian Social Investment Fund , 1997 .