User-centered, interaction design research approaches to inform the development of health risk behavior intervention technologies

Background Computers have tremendous potential for helping people change behaviors that put their health at risk. This potential has led to the development of a variety of health behavior intervention technologies (BITs) in recent years. While many of these BITs have been informed by scientific theories on behavior change, poor design can fail to engage intended users. User-centered, interaction design (IxD) research can help BIT developers create tools that are intuitive and enjoyable and that align with intended users' goals. In this manuscript, we describe an IxD research process we used to inform the development of a tablet-optimized web application designed to help heavy drinking gay and bisexual men reduce their risk for HIV when they seek HIV testing. Methods We conducted focus groups with subject matter experts (SMEs, N = 10) and intended users (N = 25). In the SME group, HIV test counselors were recruited to provide an understanding of the priorities and challenges of post-test counseling. In focus groups with intended users, participants created detailed, personalized models of two “typical” users of the proposed app (“personas”) that could be used to guide design decisions. Results SMEs emphasized the importance of putting patients at ease, and suggested that interventions should prioritize identifying personal risks and provide options for change. Personas created by intended users provided important details about users' attitudinal and emotional contexts, and their possible motivations and goals for using the app. These suggested that users might be most motivated to use the app in order to understand their personal risks, compare their behavior with others like them, help them decide whether they want to change to reduce their risk, and see all their options for doing so. Personas also provided insights about the aesthetic experience that might be most appealing to users. Conclusions Interaction design research can provide BIT development teams with personal models of likely users to help guide decisions about the allocation of design resources and the overall form and spirit of the software. These insights can help teams build BITs that are more engaging and interesting to intended users.

[1]  S. Walters,et al.  Personalized feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: an update of Walters & Neighbors (2005). , 2013, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[2]  J. Prochaska,et al.  A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[3]  D. Mohr,et al.  Behavioral intervention technologies: evidence review and recommendations for future research in mental health. , 2013, General hospital psychiatry.

[4]  K. Ethier,et al.  CDC National Health Report: leading causes of morbidity and mortality and associated behavioral risk and protective factors--United States, 2005-2013. , 2014, MMWR supplements.

[5]  Bruce Neal,et al.  A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[6]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 , 2016, The Lancet.

[7]  W. Miller,et al.  Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People to Change Addictive Behavior , 1991 .

[8]  Helen Young,et al.  Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a meta-analytic review of controlled investigations in treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking populations , 2010 .

[9]  S. Kelders,et al.  Persuasive System Design Does Matter: A Systematic Review of Adherence to Web-Based Interventions , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[10]  S. Buchbinder,et al.  Risk factors for HIV infection among men who have sex with men , 2006, AIDS.

[11]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[12]  Merlijn Kouprie,et al.  A framework for empathy in design: stepping into and out of the user's life , 2009 .

[13]  Eric Brangier,et al.  Persona: A Method to Produce Representations Focused on Consumers’ Needs , 2011 .

[14]  Kim Goodwin,et al.  Designing for the Digital Age: How to Create Human-Centered Products and Services , 2009 .

[15]  D. B. Danbjørg,et al.  Participatory design methods in telemedicine , 2016 .

[16]  D. Albarracín,et al.  Nature, decay, and spiraling of the effects of fear-inducing arguments and HIV counseling and testing: a meta-analysis of the short- and long-term outcomes of HIV-prevention interventions. , 2007, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[17]  John S. Pruitt,et al.  The Persona Lifecycle: Keeping People in Mind Throughout Product Design , 2006 .

[18]  Rainu Kaushal,et al.  Bmc Medical Informatics and Decision Making Assessing the Level of Healthcare Information Technology Adoption in the United States: a Snapshot , 2005 .

[19]  Nara L. Newcomer,et al.  User Centered Design , 2014, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[20]  Alan Cooper,et al.  About Face 3: the essentials of interaction design , 1995 .

[21]  R. Ying Motivational interviewing: helping people change , 2013 .

[22]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction , 2002 .

[23]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Activity Theory: Basic Concepts and Applications , 1995, EWHCI.

[24]  Scott T Walters,et al.  Feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: what, why and for whom? , 2005, Addictive behaviors.

[25]  W. Miller,et al.  Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a review. , 1993, Addiction.

[26]  S. Cole,et al.  Joint effects of alcohol consumption and high-risk sexual behavior on HIV seroconversion among men who have sex with men , 2013, AIDS.

[27]  Tomasz Miaskiewicz,et al.  Personas and user-centered design: How can personas benefit product design processes? , 2011 .

[28]  G. Eysenbach The Law of Attrition , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[29]  J. Finney,et al.  Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a meta-analytic review of controlled investigations in treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking populations. , 2002, Addiction.

[30]  D. Wantland,et al.  The Effectiveness of Web-Based vs. Non-Web-Based Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Behavioral Change Outcomes , 2004, Journal of medical Internet research.

[31]  Cynthia LeRouge,et al.  User profiles and personas in the design and development of consumer health technologies , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[32]  F. Fantozzi,et al.  Helping patients who drinks too much. A Clinician’s Guide , 2006 .

[33]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[34]  Juliann Cortese,et al.  Computer-tailored health interventions delivered over the Web: review and analysis of key components. , 2009, Patient education and counseling.

[35]  Robert R. Johnson,et al.  User-Centered Technology: A Rhetorical Theory for Computers and Other Mundane Artifacts , 1998 .

[36]  Parisa Rashidi,et al.  The Behavioral Intervention Technology Model: An Integrated Conceptual and Technological Framework for eHealth and mHealth Interventions , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[37]  S. Noar,et al.  Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  R. Glasgow,et al.  The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: actualizing their potential. , 2009, Annual review of public health.

[39]  N. Tractinsky,et al.  What is beautiful is usable , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[40]  Leanne M. Currie,et al.  Appreciating the Persona Paradox: Lessons from Participatory Design Sessions with HIV+ Gay Men , 2014, Nursing Informatics.

[41]  Linda Richter,et al.  Behavioural strategies to reduce HIV transmission: how to make them work better , 2008, The Lancet.

[42]  Elizabeth Murray,et al.  Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[43]  Alan Cooper,et al.  The Inmates Are Running the Asylum: Why High Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity (2nd Edition) , 1999 .