ERPs Reflect Lexical Identification in Word Fragment Priming
暂无分享,去创建一个
Angela D. Friederici | Sonja A. Kotz | Thomas C. Gunter | Claudia K. Friedrich | A. Friederici | S. Kotz | T. Gunter | C. Friedrich
[1] W Marslen-Wilson,et al. Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: words, phonemes, and features. , 1994, Psychological review.
[2] Michael D. Rugg,et al. Word and Nonword Repetition Within- and Across-Modality: An Event-Related Potential Study , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[3] M. Rugg,et al. Modality-specific effects of immediate word repetition: electrophysiological evidence. , 1999, Neuroreport.
[4] J. Segui,et al. Phonological priming in spoken word recognition with bisyllabic targets , 2001 .
[5] Michael C. Doyle,et al. A comparison of the electrophysiological effects of formal and repetition priming. , 1996, Psychophysiology.
[6] J. Grainger,et al. An Electrophysiological Study of the Effects of Orthographic Neighborhood Size on Printed Word Perception , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[7] Colin M. Brown,et al. ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: the P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation , 2000, Neuropsychologia.
[8] R. C. Oldfield. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.
[9] P C Gordon,et al. Lexical and prelexical influences on word segmentation: evidence from priming. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[10] A. Rodríguez-Fornells,et al. Morphological Priming in Spanish Verb Forms: An ERP Repetition Priming Study , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[11] Michael D. Rugg,et al. Event-related potentials and the phonological processing of words and non-words , 1984, Neuropsychologia.
[12] Michael D. Rugg,et al. Event-related potentials in phonological matching tasks , 1984, Brain and Language.
[13] D. Norris,et al. Bias effects in facilitatory phonological priming , 2002, Memory & cognition.
[14] J. H. Neely,et al. Semantic priming in the pronunciation task: The role of prospective prime-generated expectancies , 1990, Memory & cognition.
[15] Colin M. Brown,et al. ERP effects of listening to speech: semantic ERP effects , 2000, Neuropsychologia.
[16] M. Besson,et al. Behavioral and Electrophysiological Study of Phonological Priming between Bisyllabic Spoken Words , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[17] Anne Cutler,et al. Lexical influence in phonetic decision-making: Evidence from subcategorical mismatches , 1999 .
[18] Anne Cutler,et al. Comprehending spoken language: A blueprint of the listener , 1999 .
[19] Colin M. Brown,et al. Electrophysiological Evidence for Early Contextual Influences during Spoken-Word Recognition: N200 Versus N400 Effects , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[20] L. Pylkkänen,et al. Neuromagnetic Evidence for the Timing of Lexical Activation: An MEG Component Sensitive to Phonotactic Probability but Not to Neighborhood Density , 2002, Brain and Language.
[21] M. Nicholls,et al. The Effect of Orthographic Uniqueness and Deviation Points on Lexical Decisions: Evidence from Unilateral and Bilateral-Redundant Presentations , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[22] S. Soto-Faraco,et al. Journal of Memory and Language , 2001 .
[23] Antje S. Meyer,et al. Neurophysiological Manifestations of Phonological Processing: Latency Variation of a Negative ERP Component Timelocked to Phonological Mismatch , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[24] A. Cutler,et al. Voornaam is not (really) a Homophone: Lexical Prosody and Lexical Access in Dutch , 2001, Language and speech.
[25] P. Luce,et al. Probabilistic Phonotactics and Neighborhood Activation in Spoken Word Recognition , 1999 .
[26] Liina Pylkkänen,et al. The Representation of Polysemy: MEG Evidence , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[27] M. Kutas,et al. Decomposition of morphologically complex words in English: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[28] A. Cutler,et al. Constraints of Lexical Stress on Lexical Access in English: Evidence from Native and Non-native Listeners , 2002, Language and speech.
[29] S. Andrews. Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? , 1989 .
[30] J. H. Neely,et al. Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[31] G. Altmann. Cognitive models of speech processing , 1991 .
[32] C K Friedrich,et al. An electrophysiological response to different pitch contours in words , 2001, Neuroreport.
[33] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access , 2002, Cognition.
[34] J. Morais,et al. Phonological priming in spoken word recognition: Task effects , 1989, Memory & cognition.
[35] Dawn G. Blasko,et al. Similarity Mapping in Spoken Word Recognition , 1997 .
[36] Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words , 1994 .
[37] Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al. The Recognition of Spoken Words , 1999 .
[38] J. H. Neely. Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .
[39] D. Mewhort,et al. Evidence for sequential processing in visual word recognition. , 1999 .
[40] Max Coltheart,et al. Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .
[41] William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al. Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access , 1991 .