ERPs Reflect Lexical Identification in Word Fragment Priming

Behavioral evidence suggests that spoken word recognition involves the temporary activation of multiple entries in a listener's mental lexicon. This phenomenon can be demonstrated in cross-modal word fragment priming (CMWP). In CMWP, an auditory word fragment (prime) is immediately followed by a visual word or pseudoword (target). Experiment 1 investigated ERPs for targets presented in this paradigm. Half of the targets were congruent with the prime (e.g., in the prime-target pair: AM-AMBOSS [anvil]), half were not (e.g., AM-PENSUM [pensum]). Lexical entries of the congruent targets should receive activation from the prime. Thus, lexical identification of these targets should be facilitated. An ERP effect named P350, two frontal negative ERP deflections, and the N400 were sensitive to prime-target congruency. In Experiment 2, the relation of the formerly observed ERP effects to processes in a modality-independent mental lexicon was investigated by presenting primes visually. Only the P350 effect could be replicated across different fragment lengths. Therefore, the P350 is discussed as a correlate of lexical identification in a modality-independent mental lexicon.

[1]  W Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: words, phonemes, and features. , 1994, Psychological review.

[2]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Word and Nonword Repetition Within- and Across-Modality: An Event-Related Potential Study , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  M. Rugg,et al.  Modality-specific effects of immediate word repetition: electrophysiological evidence. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[4]  J. Segui,et al.  Phonological priming in spoken word recognition with bisyllabic targets , 2001 .

[5]  Michael C. Doyle,et al.  A comparison of the electrophysiological effects of formal and repetition priming. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[6]  J. Grainger,et al.  An Electrophysiological Study of the Effects of Orthographic Neighborhood Size on Printed Word Perception , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: the P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  P C Gordon,et al.  Lexical and prelexical influences on word segmentation: evidence from priming. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  A. Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Morphological Priming in Spanish Verb Forms: An ERP Repetition Priming Study , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and the phonological processing of words and non-words , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials in phonological matching tasks , 1984, Brain and Language.

[13]  D. Norris,et al.  Bias effects in facilitatory phonological priming , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[14]  J. H. Neely,et al.  Semantic priming in the pronunciation task: The role of prospective prime-generated expectancies , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[15]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  ERP effects of listening to speech: semantic ERP effects , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  M. Besson,et al.  Behavioral and Electrophysiological Study of Phonological Priming between Bisyllabic Spoken Words , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Lexical influence in phonetic decision-making: Evidence from subcategorical mismatches , 1999 .

[18]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Comprehending spoken language: A blueprint of the listener , 1999 .

[19]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Early Contextual Influences during Spoken-Word Recognition: N200 Versus N400 Effects , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  L. Pylkkänen,et al.  Neuromagnetic Evidence for the Timing of Lexical Activation: An MEG Component Sensitive to Phonotactic Probability but Not to Neighborhood Density , 2002, Brain and Language.

[21]  M. Nicholls,et al.  The Effect of Orthographic Uniqueness and Deviation Points on Lexical Decisions: Evidence from Unilateral and Bilateral-Redundant Presentations , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[22]  S. Soto-Faraco,et al.  Journal of Memory and Language , 2001 .

[23]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Neurophysiological Manifestations of Phonological Processing: Latency Variation of a Negative ERP Component Timelocked to Phonological Mismatch , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  A. Cutler,et al.  Voornaam is not (really) a Homophone: Lexical Prosody and Lexical Access in Dutch , 2001, Language and speech.

[25]  P. Luce,et al.  Probabilistic Phonotactics and Neighborhood Activation in Spoken Word Recognition , 1999 .

[26]  Liina Pylkkänen,et al.  The Representation of Polysemy: MEG Evidence , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  M. Kutas,et al.  Decomposition of morphologically complex words in English: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[28]  A. Cutler,et al.  Constraints of Lexical Stress on Lexical Access in English: Evidence from Native and Non-native Listeners , 2002, Language and speech.

[29]  S. Andrews Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? , 1989 .

[30]  J. H. Neely,et al.  Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  G. Altmann Cognitive models of speech processing , 1991 .

[32]  C K Friedrich,et al.  An electrophysiological response to different pitch contours in words , 2001, Neuroreport.

[33]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access , 2002, Cognition.

[34]  J. Morais,et al.  Phonological priming in spoken word recognition: Task effects , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[35]  Dawn G. Blasko,et al.  Similarity Mapping in Spoken Word Recognition , 1997 .

[36]  Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words , 1994 .

[37]  Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al.  The Recognition of Spoken Words , 1999 .

[38]  J. H. Neely Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[39]  D. Mewhort,et al.  Evidence for sequential processing in visual word recognition. , 1999 .

[40]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[41]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access , 1991 .