Rocket ship or Blimp? - Implications of Malicious Accounts removal on Twitter

In this study we investigate how the removal of malicious accounts that follow legitimate accounts owned by popular people impacts the popularity of tweets posted by celebrities and politicians. Using retweet counts, we analyze to what extent malicious accounts contribute to amplification of tweets across the network. We organize tweets into three broad categories (Rocket Ship, Jet or Blimp) and investigate how the distribution of tweets is influenced by a cleanup of malicious accounts. To understand how the suspension of malicious accounts impacts the propagation of messages on Twitter, we conduct a descriptive statistical analysis of retweets of a total of 464 Donald Trump tweets. We find a statistically significant difference in the mean count of retweets and favorites before and after the malicious account removal. Preliminary results of our analysis show that the implications of Twitter’s cleanup initiatives, which targeted malicious accounts, are visible in the narrowing amplitudes of retweet values. However, the distribution of tweet categories based on the number of retweets remains unchanged.

[1]  Qiang Cao,et al.  Uncovering Large Groups of Active Malicious Accounts in Online Social Networks , 2014, CCS.

[2]  Sushil Jajodia,et al.  Detecting Automation of Twitter Accounts: Are You a Human, Bot, or Cyborg? , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing.

[3]  Fabrício Benevenuto,et al.  Reverse engineering socialbot infiltration strategies in Twitter , 2014, 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM).

[4]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Protesting Corruption on Twitter: Is It a Bot or Is It a Person? , 2016 .

[5]  Meredith Rolfe,et al.  Social networks and agent‐based modelling , 2014 .

[6]  AbdulMalik S. Al-Salman,et al.  Twitter turing test: Identifying social machines , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[7]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  The rise of social bots , 2014, Commun. ACM.

[8]  Roberto Di Pietro,et al.  Fame for sale: Efficient detection of fake Twitter followers , 2015, Decis. Support Syst..

[9]  Michael Sirivianos,et al.  Aiding the Detection of Fake Accounts in Large Scale Social Online Services , 2012, NSDI.

[10]  V. S. Subrahmanian,et al.  Using sentiment to detect bots on Twitter: Are humans more opinionated than bots? , 2014, 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2014).

[11]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Tweets as impact indicators: Examining the implications of automated “bot” accounts on Twitter , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  Is that social bot behaving unethically? , 2017, CACM.

[13]  Tobias Höllerer,et al.  Botivist: Calling Volunteers to Action using Online Bots , 2015, CSCW.

[14]  Gianluca Stringhini,et al.  EVILCOHORT: Detecting Communities of Malicious Accounts on Online Services , 2015, USENIX Security Symposium.

[15]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  "Manipulation and abuse on social media" by Emilio Ferrara with Ching-man Au Yeung as coordinator , 2015, SIGWEB Newsl..

[16]  P. Kumaraguru,et al.  $1.00 per RT #BostonMarathon #PrayForBoston: Analyzing fake content on Twitter , 2013, 2013 APWG eCrime Researchers Summit.

[17]  Philip N. Howard,et al.  Political Bots and the Manipulation of Public Opinion in Venezuela , 2015, ArXiv.

[18]  Piotr Sapiezynski,et al.  Evidence of complex contagion of information in social media: An experiment using Twitter bots , 2017, PloS one.

[19]  Haewoon Kwak,et al.  Fragile online relationship: a first look at unfollow dynamics in twitter , 2011, CHI.

[20]  Sinan Aral,et al.  The spread of true and false news online , 2018, Science.

[21]  Wei Hu,et al.  Twitter spammer detection using data stream clustering , 2014, Inf. Sci..