Leadership and Its Basis in Problems of Social Coordination

Leadership is a means by which social groups attempt to realize gains from cooperation, coordination, and efficient allocation. The attempt to achieve such gains gives rise to further, overarching problems of coordination. The latter problems are recurrent but are likely to vary from one situation to the next; this makes decentralized methods of solution especially difficult, and provides the ultimate reason leadership is needed, invented, and accepted. Solution of such overarching problems makes leadership possible in the basic problems in which social gains are available, including activities such as organizing, sanctioning, communicating, and allocating. The stability of leadership is based on the group's need to solve coordination problems; as a result, a leader has discretion or "power," and can get away with less-than-maximal service of group goals. This approach to understanding leadership suggests several useful techniques for the study of political leadership in particular settings.

[1]  Douglass C. North,et al.  The rise of the western world , 1976 .

[2]  Rick K. Wilson,et al.  Comment on van de Kragt, Orbell, and Dawes (Vol. 77, March 1983, pp. 112-122) , 1984, American Political Science Review.

[3]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Coordination Through Committees and Markets , 1987 .

[4]  Michael Taylor The possibility of cooperation , 1987 .

[5]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information , 1986 .

[6]  C. Geertz,et al.  The Interpretation of Cultures , 1973 .

[7]  T. Schelling,et al.  The Strategy of Conflict. , 1961 .

[8]  John Orbell,et al.  The Minimal Contributing Set as a Solution to Public Goods Problems , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[9]  David Lewis Convention: A Philosophical Study , 1986 .

[10]  N. Frohlich,et al.  Modern political economy , 1978 .

[11]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Bayesian Equilibrium and Incentive-Compatibility: An Introduction , 1983 .

[12]  John Orbell,et al.  Cooperation for the benefit of us—Not me, or my conscience. , 1990 .

[13]  Norman Frohlich,et al.  Political leadership and collective goods , 1971 .

[14]  Terry M. Moe,et al.  Control and Feedback in Economic Regulation: The Case of the NLRB , 1985, American Political Science Review.

[15]  R. Neustadt,et al.  Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership from FDR to Carter , 1980 .

[16]  Wilbur D. Mills: A Study in Congressional Influence , 1969 .

[17]  F. Greenstein Leadership in the Modern Presidency , 1988 .

[18]  K. Arrow Social Choice and Individual Values , 1951 .

[19]  V. Crawford,et al.  Learning How to Cooperate: Optimal Play in Repeated Coordination Games , 1990 .

[20]  Thomas R. Palfrey,et al.  Voter Participation and Strategic Uncertainty , 1985, American Political Science Review.

[21]  Michael Boss Economic theory of democracy , 1974 .

[22]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action , 1965 .

[23]  A. Rubinstein,et al.  The Nash bargaining solution in economic modelling , 1985 .

[24]  Joseph Farrell Cheap Talk, Coordination, and Entry , 1987 .

[25]  R. Calvert Reputation and legislative leadership , 1987 .

[26]  Samuel Kernell,et al.  Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership , 1987 .

[27]  Howard Raiffa,et al.  Games And Decisions , 1958 .

[28]  T. L. Schwartz The Logic of Collective Action , 1986 .

[29]  Jeffrey S. Banks,et al.  A Battle-of-the-Sexes Game with Incomplete Information , 1992 .

[30]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Man. , 1957 .

[31]  R. Bates,et al.  Cooperation by Design: Leadership, Structure, and Collective Dilemmas , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[32]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Social Choice and Individual Values , 1951 .

[33]  P. Kline Models of man , 1986, Nature.

[34]  Richard F. Fenno Congressmen in committees , 1973 .

[35]  B. Frey Modern political economy , 1978 .

[36]  Kenneth Janda,et al.  Towards the Explication of the Concept of Leadership in Terms of the Concept of Power , 1960 .

[37]  J. French A formal theory of social power. , 1956, Psychology Review.

[38]  Joseph Cooper,et al.  Institutional Context and Leadership Style: The House from Cannon to Rayburn , 1981, American Political Science Review.

[39]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[40]  W. Riker,et al.  Some Ambiguities in the Notion of Power , 1964, American Political Science Review.

[41]  David Hume A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects , 1972 .

[42]  John E. Chubb,et al.  The New Direction in American Politics , 1985 .

[43]  George C. Edwards Presidential influence in Congress , 1980 .

[44]  Mathew D. McCubbins,et al.  A Theory of Political Control and Agency Discretion , 1989 .

[45]  J. Mueller,et al.  War, presidents, and public opinion , 1973 .

[46]  R. Kirk CONVENTION: A PHILOSOPHICAL STUDY , 1970 .

[47]  H. Rosenthal,et al.  Private incentives in social dilemmas: The effects of incomplete information and altruism , 1988 .