Policies, practices, and attitudes of north american medical journal editors
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Fletcher,et al. The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial. , 1990, JAMA.
[2] S. Fiske,et al. The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .
[3] B Healy,et al. Women in science: from panes to ceilings. , 1992, Science.
[4] J P Kassirer,et al. The next transformation in the delivery of health care. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.
[5] M. Zanna,et al. Attitudes and Attitude Change , 1993 .
[6] R. Kravitz,et al. Medical researchers and the media. Attitudes toward public dissemination of research. , 1992, JAMA.
[7] A. Weller. Editorial peer review in US medical journals. , 1990, JAMA.
[8] M Nylenna,et al. Multiple blinded reviews of the same two manuscripts. Effects of referee characteristics and publication language. , 1994, JAMA.
[9] J. R. Gilbert,et al. Is there gender bias in JAMA's peer review process? , 1994, JAMA.
[10] P. Rochon,et al. Evaluating the quality of articles published in journal supplements compared with the quality of those published in the parent journal. , 1994, JAMA.
[11] 一馬 原岡,et al. Lindzey, G & Aronson, E., 1985, The Handbook of Social Psychology, 3rd Edition, Vol. II, Random House, New York. , 1986 .
[12] S. B. Friedman,et al. The effects of blinding on acceptance of research papers by peer review. , 1994, JAMA.
[13] Michael S. Wilkes,et al. Pharmaceutical Advertisements in Leading Medical Journals: Experts' Assessments , 1992 .
[14] Ron D. Hays,et al. A Five-Item Measure of Socially Desirable Response Set , 1989 .
[15] E. Lawson,et al. Effect of institutional prestige on reviewers' recommendations and editorial decisions. , 1994, JAMA.
[16] B. Healy. Women's health, public welfare. , 1991, JAMA.
[17] Lee Shiflett,et al. A difficult balance: Editorial peer review in medicine , 1988, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[18] J P Kassirer,et al. The Ingelfinger Rule revisited. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.