Key results and implications from phase 1(c) of the Project for Intercomparison of Land-surface Parametrization Schemes

Abstract Using atmospheric forcing data generated from a general circulation climate model, sixteen land surface schemes participating in the Project for the Intercomparison of Land-surface Parametrization Schemes (PILPS) were run off-line to equilibrium using forcing data from a GCM representative of a tropical forest and a mid-latitude grassland grid point. The values for each land surface parameter (roughness length, minimum stomatal resistance, soil depth etc.) were provided. Results were quality controlled and analyzed, focusing on the scatter simulated amongst the models. There were large differences in how the models’ partitioned available energy between sensible and latent heat. Annually averaged, simulations for the tropical forest ranged by 79 1 3;W m-2 for the sensible heat flux and 80 W m-2 for the latent heat flux. For the grassland, simulations ranged by 34 W m-2 for the sensible heat flux and 27 W m-2 for the latent heat flux. Similarly large differences were found for simulated runoff and soil moisture and at the monthly time scale. The models’ simulation of annually averaged effective radiative temperature varied with a range, between all the models, of 1.4 K for tropical forest and 2.2 K for the grassland. The simulation of latent and sensible heat fluxes by a standard ‘bucket’ models was anomalous although this could be corrected by an additional resistance term. These results imply that the current land surface models do not agree on the land surface climate when the atmospheric forcing and surface parameters are prescribed. The nature of the experimental design, it being offline and with artificial forcing, generally precludes judgements concerning the relative quality of any specific model. Although these results were produced de-coupled from a host model, they do cast doubt on the reliability of land surface schemes. It is therefore a priority to resolve the disparity in the simulations, understand the reasons behind the scatter and to determine whether this lack of agreement in de-coupled tests is reproduced in coupled experiments.

[1]  D. Verseghy,et al.  CLASS-A Canadian Land Surface Scheme for GCMs , 1993 .

[2]  S. Manabe.  CLIMATE AND THE OCEAN CIRCULATION1 , 1969 .

[3]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models , 1994 .

[4]  A. Boone,et al.  A Parameterization for Land–Atmosphere-Cloud Exchange (PLACE): Documentation and Testing of a Detailed Process Model of the Partly Cloudy Boundary Layer over Heterogeneous Land , 1995 .

[5]  S. Planton,et al.  A Simple Parameterization of Land Surface Processes for Meteorological Models , 1989 .

[6]  Ann Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Biosphere-atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) for the NCAR Community Climate Model , 1986 .

[7]  R. Dickinson,et al.  The Project for Intercomparison of Land Surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS): Phases 2 and 3 , 1993 .

[8]  D. D. Vries,et al.  Simultaneous transfer of heat and moisture in porous media , 1958 .

[9]  P. Krummel,et al.  A soil-canopy scheme for use in a numerical model of the atmosphere: 1D stand-alone model , 1991 .

[10]  A. Perrier,et al.  SECHIBA : a new set of parameterizations of the hydrologic exchanges at the land-atmosphere interface within the LMD atmospheric general circulation model , 1993 .

[11]  A. Pitman,et al.  The BASE land surface model , 1998 .

[12]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  Surface soil moisture parameterization of the VIC-2L model: Evaluation and modification , 1996 .

[13]  M. Budyko.  The heat balance of the earth's surface , 1958 .

[14]  P. Milly.  Potential evaporation and soil moisture in general circulation models , 1992 .

[15]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  The Interplay between Transpiration and Runoff Formulations in Land Surface Schemes Used with Atmospheric Models , 1997 .

[16]  Charles W. Boast,et al.  Introduction to Soil Physics , 1983 .

[17]  A. Dalcher,et al.  A Simple Biosphere Model (SIB) for Use within General Circulation Models , 1986 .

[18]  J. R. Philip,et al.  Moisture movement in porous materials under temperature gradients , 1957 .

[19]  R. Smith,et al.  CANOPY, SURFACE AND SOIL HYDROLOGY , 1996 .

[20]  C. E. Desborough,et al.  The Impact of Root Weighting on the Response of Transpiration to Moisture Stress in Land Surface Schemes , 1997 .

[21]  R. Koster,et al.  Modeling the land surface boundary in climate models as a composite of independent vegetation stands , 1992 .

[22]  P. Wetzel,et al.  Evapotranspiration from Nonuniform Surfaces: A First Approach for Short-Term Numerical Weather Prediction , 1988 .

[23]  Y. Xue,et al.  Use of midlatitude soil moisture and meteorological observations to validate soil moisture simulations with biosphere and bucket models , 1995 .

[24]  C. Rosenzweig,et al.  Improved Ground Hydrology Calculations for Global Climate Models (GCMs): Soil Water Movement and Evapotranspiration , 1988 .