Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer

Breast cancer patients with the same stage of disease can have markedly different treatment responses and overall outcome. The strongest predictors for metastases (for example, lymph node status and histological grade) fail to classify accurately breast tumours according to their clinical behaviour. Chemotherapy or hormonal therapy reduces the risk of distant metastases by approximately one-third; however, 70–80% of patients receiving this treatment would have survived without it. None of the signatures of breast cancer gene expression reported to date allow for patient-tailored therapy strategies. Here we used DNA microarray analysis on primary breast tumours of 117 young patients, and applied supervised classification to identify a gene expression signature strongly predictive of a short interval to distant metastases (‘poor prognosis’ signature) in patients without tumour cells in local lymph nodes at diagnosis (lymph node negative). In addition, we established a signature that identifies tumours of BRCA1 carriers. The poor prognosis signature consists of genes regulating cell cycle, invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis. This gene expression profile will outperform all currently used clinical parameters in predicting disease outcome. Our findings provide a strategy to select patients who would benefit from adjuvant therapy.

[1]  W. L. McGuire,et al.  Breast cancer prognostic factors: evaluation guidelines. , 1991, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  I. Bièche,et al.  Genetic alterations in breast cancer , 1995, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[3]  I. Verma,et al.  Transcriptional activation by BRCA1 , 1996, Nature.

[4]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  Cyclin D1 expression in invasive breast cancer. Correlations and prognostic value. , 1997, The American journal of pathology.

[5]  Mike Clarke,et al.  Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials , 1998, The Lancet.

[6]  Mike Clarke,et al.  Polychemotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials , 1998, The Lancet.

[7]  M. Stratton,et al.  Multifactorial analysis of differences between sporadic breast cancers and cancers involving BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Distinctive gene expression patterns in human mammary epithelial cells and breast cancers. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  C. Caldas,et al.  Molecular profiling of breast cancer: portraits but not physiognomy , 2000, Breast Cancer Research.

[10]  J. Herman,et al.  Promoter hypermethylation and BRCA1 inactivation in sporadic breast and ovarian tumors. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  T. Hughes,et al.  Signaling and circuitry of multiple MAPK pathways revealed by a matrix of global gene expression profiles. , 2000, Science.

[12]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.

[13]  M J O'Hare,et al.  Linking gene expression patterns to therapeutic groups in breast cancer. , 2000, Cancer research.

[14]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  W. Lee,et al.  BRCA1 mediates ligand-independent transcriptional repression of the estrogen receptor , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  M. Ringnér,et al.  Classification and diagnostic prediction of cancers using gene expression profiling and artificial neural networks , 2001, Nature Medicine.

[17]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Microarrays—the 21st century divining rod? , 2001, Nature Medicine.

[18]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Expression profiling using microarrays fabricated by an ink-jet oligonucleotide synthesizer , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  Carsten O. Peterson,et al.  Estrogen receptor status in breast cancer is associated with remarkably distinct gene expression patterns. , 2001, Cancer research.

[20]  C. Sweep,et al.  Randomized adjuvant chemotherapy trial in high-risk, lymph node-negative breast cancer patients identified by urokinase-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  S. Ethier,et al.  Identification of gene expression profiles that predict the aggressive behavior of breast cancer cells. , 2001, Cancer research.

[22]  E. Dougherty,et al.  Gene-expression profiles in hereditary breast cancer. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  R. Spang,et al.  Predicting the clinical status of human breast cancer by using gene expression profiles , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Robert J. Mayer,et al.  National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: adjuvant therapy for breast cancer, November 1-3, 2000. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[25]  Todd,et al.  Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma outcome prediction by gene-expression profiling and supervised machine learning , 2002, Nature Medicine.

[26]  R. Love Meeting highlights: International Consensus Panel on the treatment of primary breast cancer. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  Tatyana Chernova,et al.  Th1-specific cell surface protein Tim-3 regulates macrophage activation and severity of an autoimmune disease , 2002, Nature.

[28]  Robert L. Sutherland,et al.  Cyclins and Breast Cancer , 1996, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.