Prevalence of lameness and claw lesions during different stages in the reproductive cycle of sows and the impact on reproduction results

Lameness in sows is an emerging disease condition with major effects on animal welfare and economics. Yet the direct impact on reproduction results remains unclear. The present field study investigated the impact of lameness and claw lesions throughout the reproductive cycle on (re)production results of sows. In five farms, a total of 491 group-housed sows were followed up for a period of one reproductive cycle. Sows were assessed for lameness every time they were moved to another area in the farm. Claw lesions were scored at the beginning and at the end of the cycle. Reproduction results included the number of live-born piglets, stillborn piglets, mummified fetuses and crushed piglets, weaning-to-oestrus interval and the presence of sows not showing oestrus post weaning, returning to service and aborting. Sows that left the group were recorded and the reason was noted. A mean prevalence of lameness of 5.9% was found, although it depended on the time in the productive cycle. The highest percentage of lame sows (8.1%) was found when sows were moved from the post-weaning to the gestation stable. No significant associations were found between lameness and reproduction parameters with the exception of the effect on mummified foetuses. Wall cracks, white line lesions, heel lesions and skin lesions did have an effect on farrowing performance. Of all sows, 22% left the group throughout the study, and almost half of these sows were removed from the farm. Lameness was the second most important reason for culling. Sows culled because of lameness were significantly younger compared with sows culled for other reasons (parity: 2.6 ± 1.3 v. 4.0 ± 1.8). In conclusion, the present results indicate that lameness mainly affects farm productivity indirectly through its effect on sow longevity, whereas claw lesions directly affect some reproductive parameters. The high percentage of lame sows in the insemination stable indicate that risk factor studies should not only focus on the gestation stable, but also on housing conditions in the insemination stable.

[1]  Anna K. Johnson,et al.  The effect of hoof abnormalities on sow behavior and performance , 2012 .

[2]  L. Green,et al.  Animal-Based Measures for the Assessment of Welfare State of Dairy Cattle, Pigs and Laying Hens: Consensus of Expert Opinion , 2003, Animal Welfare.

[3]  N. Lundeheim,et al.  Sow removal in Swedish commercial herds , 2007 .

[4]  K. Stalder,et al.  Financial impact of average parity of culled females in a breed-to-wean swine operation using replacement gilt net present value analysis , 2003 .

[5]  H Gjein,et al.  Housing of Pregnant Sows in Loose and Confined Systems–a Field Study. 2. Claw Lesions: Morphology, Prevalence, Location and Relation to Age , 1995, Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica.

[6]  Tine Rousing,et al.  Associations between lying-down behaviour problems and body condition, limb disorders and skin lesions of lactating sows housed in farrowing crates in commercial sow herds , 2004 .

[7]  Leena Anil,et al.  Effect of lameness on sow longevity. , 2009, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[8]  Sukumaran Nair,et al.  Epidemiology of lameness in breeding female pigs. , 2011 .

[9]  N Toft,et al.  The interrelationships between clinical signs and their effect on involuntary culling among pregnant sows in group-housing systems. , 2010, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[10]  P. Brooks,et al.  Supplementary biotin for sows: effect on claw integrity , 1988, Veterinary Record.

[11]  K. Willgert.  The economic and welfare impact of lameness in sows in England , 2011 .

[12]  R. B. Larssen,et al.  Housing of Pregnant Sows in Loose and Confined Systems–a Field Study. 3. The Impact of Housing Factors on Claw Lesions , 1995, Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica.

[13]  J. Rendel,et al.  Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A, Animal Science , 1991 .

[14]  M. Enokida,et al.  Claw lesions in lactating sows on commercial farms were associated with postural behavior but not with suboptimal reproductive performance or culling risk , 2011 .

[15]  D. S Arey,et al.  Time course for the formation and disruption of social organisation in group-housed sows , 1999 .

[16]  Leena Anil,et al.  Evaluation of well-being, productivity, and longevity of pregnant sows housed in groups in pens with an electronic sow feeder or separately in gestation stalls. , 2005, American journal of veterinary research.

[17]  De Pita,et al.  Sow lameness and claw lesions evaluation. , 2010 .

[18]  L. Green,et al.  Foot lesions in finishing pigs and their associations with the type of floor , 1999, Veterinary Record.

[19]  Leena Anil,et al.  Factors associated with claw lesions in gestating sows , 2007 .

[20]  E. Fàbrega,et al.  The welfare of gestating sows in conventional stalls and large groups on deep litter , 2007 .

[21]  K. E. Bøe,et al.  STRAW BEDDING OR CONCRETE FLOOR FOR LOOSE-HOUSED PREGNANT SOWS : CONSEQUENCES FOR AGGRESSION, PRODUCTION AND PHYSICAL HEALTH , 1999 .

[22]  Xavier Manteca,et al.  Evaluation of welfare and productivity in pregnant sows kept in stalls or in 2 different group housing systems , 2010 .

[23]  K. Stalder,et al.  Factors Influencing Sow Culling , 2006 .

[24]  O. Peltoniemi,et al.  Lameness and fertility of sows and gilts in randomly selected loose-housed herds in Finland , 2006, Veterinary Record.

[25]  Rodney W. Johnson,et al.  Inhibition of growth by pro-inflammatory cytokines: an integrated view. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[26]  R. Morrison,et al.  Prevalence of lesions and body condition scores among female swine at slaughter. , 1999, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[27]  Field research on veterinary problems in group-housed sows--a survey of lameness. , 1993, Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin. Reihe A.