Bioinformatic analysis of the urine proteome of acute allograft rejection.

The urinary proteome in health and disease attracts increasing attention because of the potential diagnostic and pathophysiologic biomarker information carried by specific excreted proteins or their constellations. This cross-sectional study aimed to analyze the urinary proteome in patients with biopsy-proven acute rejection (n = 23) compared with transplant recipients with stable graft function (n = 22) and healthy volunteers (n = 20) and to correlate this with clinical, morphologic, and laboratory data. Urine samples were preadsorbed on four different protein chip surfaces, and the protein composition was analyzed using a surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer platform. The data were analyzed using two independent approaches to sample classification. Patients who experienced acute rejection could be distinguished from stable patients with a sensitivity of 90.5 to 91.3% and a specificity of 77.2 to 83.3%, depending on the classifier used. Protein masses that were important in constructing the classification algorithms included those of mass 2003.0, 2802.6, 4756.3, 5872.4, 6990.6, 19,018.8, and 25,665.7 Da. Normal urine was distinguished from transplant urine using a protein marker of mass 78,531.2 Da with both a sensitivity and a specificity of 100%. In conclusion, (1) urine proteome in transplant recipients with stable graft function was significantly different from healthy control subjects, and (2) acute rejections were characterized by a constellation of excreted proteins. Analysis of the urinary proteome may expedite the noninvasive prediction of acute graft rejection, thus importantly assisting in establishing the diagnosis.

[1]  E. Petricoin,et al.  Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer , 2002, The Lancet.

[2]  G. Wright,et al.  Development of a novel proteomic approach for the detection of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder in urine. , 2001, The American journal of pathology.

[3]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[4]  M. Dooldeniya,et al.  Role of duplex Doppler sonography in diagnosis of acute allograft dysfunction—time to stop measuring the resistive index? , 2003, Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.

[5]  M. Heneghan,et al.  Fulminant hepatic failure. , 2003, Seminars in gastrointestinal disease.

[6]  H. E. Hansen,et al.  The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. , 1999, Kidney international.

[7]  P. Nickerson,et al.  Proteomic-based detection of urine proteins associated with acute renal allograft rejection. , 2004, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[8]  D. Leehey,et al.  Improved graft survival after renal transplantation in the United States, 1988 to 1996. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  M. Sarwal,et al.  Molecular heterogeneity in acute renal allograft rejection identified by DNA microarray profiling. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  D. Chan,et al.  Proteomics and bioinformatics approaches for identification of serum biomarkers to detect breast cancer. , 2002, Clinical chemistry.

[11]  M. Suthanthiran,et al.  Noninvasive diagnosis of renal-allograft rejection by measurement of messenger RNA for perforin and granzyme B in urine. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  D. Chan,et al.  Characterization of Renal Allograft Rejection by Urinary Proteomic Analysis , 2003, Annals of surgery.

[13]  S. Fuggle,et al.  Chronic allograft failure in human renal transplantation: a multivariate risk factor analysis. , 2000, Annals of surgery.

[14]  S. Hariharan,et al.  Improved graft survival after renal transplantation in the United States, 1988 to 1996. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  M. Goligorsky,et al.  Toward proteomics in uroscopy: urinary protein profiles after radiocontrast medium administration. , 2001, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[16]  Eld,et al.  COMPARISON OF MORTALITY IN ALL PATIENTS ON DIALYSIS , PATIENTS ON DIALYSIS AWAITING TRANSPLANTATION , AND RECIPIENTS OF A FIRST CADAVERIC TRANSPLANT , 2000 .

[17]  A. Hartmann,et al.  Serum amyloid A protein is a clinically useful indicator of acute renal allograft rejection. , 1997, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[18]  P. Nickerson,et al.  Beneficial effects of treatment of early subclinical rejection: a randomized study. , 1998, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[19]  H. Meier‐Kriesche,et al.  Death After Graft Loss: An Important Late Study Endpoint in Kidney Transplantation , 2002, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[20]  S. Dudoit,et al.  Comparison of Discrimination Methods for the Classification of Tumors Using Gene Expression Data , 2002 .

[21]  Eric Fung,et al.  The use of SELDI ProteinChip array technology in renal disease research. , 2003, Methods in molecular medicine.

[22]  D. Rush,et al.  Histological findings in early routine biopsies of stable renal allograft recipients. , 1994, Transplantation.

[23]  Quantitative assessment of the first acute rejection as a predictor of renal transplant outcome. , 1999, Transplantation.

[24]  E. Fung,et al.  ProteinChip clinical proteomics: computational challenges and solutions. , 2002, BioTechniques.

[25]  R. Wolfe,et al.  Long-term survival in renal transplant recipients with graft function. , 2000, Kidney international.

[26]  A. Gaber,et al.  The correlation of Banff scoring with reversibility of first and recurrent rejection episodes. , 1996, Transplantation.

[27]  P. Nickerson,et al.  Urine protein profiling with surface-enhanced laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. , 2004, Kidney international.

[28]  Serdar Yilmaz,et al.  Chronic renal allograft rejection can be predicted by area under the serum creatinine versus time curve (AUCCr). , 1995, Kidney international.