The impact crater as a habitat: effects of impact processing of target materials.

Impact structures are a rare habitat on Earth. However, where they do occur they can potentially have an important influence on the local ecology. Some of the types of habitat created in the immediate post-impact environment are not specific to the impact phenomenon, such as hydrothermal systems and crater lakes that can be found, for instance, in post-volcanic environments, albeit with different thermal characteristics than those associated with impact. However, some of the habitats created are specifically linked to processes of impact processing. Two examples of how impact processing of target materials has created novel habitats that improve the opportunities for colonization are found in the Haughton impact structure in the Canadian High Arctic. Impact-shocked rocks have become a habitat for endolithic microorganisms, and large, impact-shattered blocks of rock are used as resting sites by avifauna. However, some materials produced by an impact, such as melt sheet rocks, can make craters more biologically depauperate than the area surrounding them. Although there are no recent craters with which to study immediate post-impact colonization, these data yield insights into generalized mechanisms of how impact processing can influence post-impact succession. Because impact events are one of a number of processes that can bring localized destruction to ecosystems, understanding the manner in which impact structures are recolonized is of ecological interest. Impact craters are a universal phenomenon on solid planetary surfaces, and so they are of potential biological relevance on other planetary surfaces, particularly Mars.

[1]  R. Facius,et al.  Biological UV Dosimetry as Tool for Assessing the Risks from an Increased Environmental UV-B Radiation , 1999 .

[2]  W. Boynton,et al.  Maps of Subsurface Hydrogen from the High Energy Neutron Detector, Mars Odyssey , 2002, Science.

[3]  Tim R. New,et al.  Colonization of the Krakatau Islands by Animals: A Perspective from the 1980s , 1990 .

[4]  H. Melosh.  Impact Cratering: A Geologic Process , 1986 .

[5]  P. Robertson,et al.  Haughton impact structure: structural and morphological aspects , 1983 .

[6]  W. Gold.  The influence of cryptogamic crusts on the thermal environment and temperature relations of plants in a high arctic polar desert, Devon Island, N.W.T., Canada , 1998 .

[7]  Pascal Lee,et al.  The biology of impact craters — a review , 2002, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[8]  G. Henry,et al.  Patterns of Plant Distribution within Two Polar Desert Landscapes , 1994 .

[9]  G. Horneck,et al.  The DLR biofilm as personal UV dosimeter , 1999 .

[10]  Pascal Lee,et al.  The Haughton‐Mars Project: Overview of science investigations at the Haughton impact structure and surrounding terrains, and relevance to planetary studies , 2005 .

[11]  D. Stöffler,et al.  Composition of the Crystalline Basement and Shock Metamorphism of Crystalline and Sedimentary Target Rocks at the Haughton Impact Crater, Devon Island, Canada , 1988 .

[12]  E. Lévesque,et al.  Phenological and growth responses of Papaver radicatum along altitudinal gradients in the Canadian High Arctic , 1997 .

[13]  R. Haag.  Nutrient limitations to plant production in two tundra communities , 1974 .

[14]  James A. MacMahon,et al.  Plant succession following the Mount St. Helens volcanic eruption : facilitation by a burrowing rodent, Thomomys talpoides. , 1985 .

[15]  E. Jessberger.  40Ar-39Ar Dating of the Haughton Impact Structure , 1988 .

[16]  A. Eckstaller,et al.  Gravity and Magnetic Investigations in the Haughton Impact Structure, Devon Island, Canada , 1988 .

[17]  Pascal Lee,et al.  Impact‐induced hydrothermal activity within the Haughton impact structure, arctic Canada: Generation of a transient, warm, wet oasis , 2001 .

[18]  K. Keil,et al.  Fluidization and hydrothermal alteration of the suevite deposit at the Ries Crater, West Germany, and implications for Mars , 1986 .

[19]  Z. Hajnal,et al.  Seismic Signature of the Haughton Structure , 1988 .

[20]  David M. Wood,et al.  Dynamics of herbaceous vegetation recovery on Mount St. Helens, Washington, USA, after a volcanic eruption , 1988, Vegetatio.

[21]  P. Broady.  The ecology of sublithic terrestrial algae at the Vestfold Hills, Antarctica , 1981 .

[22]  David G. Anderson,et al.  Association of Plant Distribution Patterns and Microenvironments on Patterned Ground in a Polar Desert, Devon Island, N.W.T., Canada , 1998 .

[23]  D. Kring.  Air blast produced by the Meteor Crater impact event and a reconstruction of the affected environment , 1997 .

[24]  T. Frisch,et al.  Haughton Astrobleme: A Mid-Cenozoic Impact Crater Devon Island, Canadian Arctic Archipelago , 1978 .

[25]  J. Maxwell.  Climatic Regions of the Canadian Arctic Islands , 1981 .

[26]  E. Friedmann,et al.  Water relations and photosynthesis in the cryptoendolithic microbial habitat of hot and cold deserts , 2005, Microbial Ecology.

[27]  Charles S. Cockell,et al.  Impact‐induced microbial endolithic habitats , 2002 .

[28]  S. Golubić,et al.  The lithobiontic ecological niche, with special reference to microorganisms , 1981 .

[29]  L. Hickey,et al.  The Stratigraphy, Sedimentology, and Fossils of the Haughton Formation: A Post-Impact Crater-Fill, Devon Island, N.W.T., Canada , 1988 .

[30]  M. D. Stokes,et al.  Microbiology and Vegetation of Micro-oases and Polar Desert, Haughton Impact Crater, Devon Island, Nunavut, Canada , 2001 .

[31]  Gordon R. Osinski,et al.  Impact-generated carbonate melts: evidence from the Haughton structure, Canada , 2001 .

[32]  C. Whitlock,et al.  Pollen and Vertebrates of the Early Neogene Haughton Formation, Devon Island, Arctic Canada , 1990 .