Feature-Based Lucas–Kanade and Active Appearance Models

Lucas-Kanade and active appearance models are among the most commonly used methods for image alignment and facial fitting, respectively. They both utilize nonlinear gradient descent, which is usually applied on intensity values. In this paper, we propose the employment of highly descriptive, densely sampled image features for both problems. We show that the strategy of warping the multichannel dense feature image at each iteration is more beneficial than extracting features after warping the intensity image at each iteration. Motivated by this observation, we demonstrate robust and accurate alignment and fitting performance using a variety of powerful feature descriptors. Especially with the employment of histograms of oriented gradient and scale-invariant feature transform features, our method significantly outperforms the current state-of-the-art results on in-the-wild databases.

[1]  Richard Bowden,et al.  Mutual Information for Lucas-Kanade Tracking (MILK): An Inverse Compositional Formulation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  Andrea Vedaldi,et al.  Vlfeat: an open and portable library of computer vision algorithms , 2010, ACM Multimedia.

[3]  Stefanos Zafeiriou,et al.  300 Faces in-the-Wild Challenge: The First Facial Landmark Localization Challenge , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops.

[4]  PanticMaja,et al.  300 Faces In-The-Wild Challenge , 2016 .

[5]  Peter Kovesi,et al.  Symmetry and Asymmetry from Local Phase , 1997 .

[6]  Rasmus Larsen,et al.  Multi-band modelling of appearance , 2003, Image Vis. Comput..

[7]  Christopher J. Taylor,et al.  Wavelet Compression of Active Appearance Models , 1999, MICCAI.

[8]  Bill Triggs,et al.  Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[9]  Stefan Fischer,et al.  Face authentication with Gabor information on deformable graphs , 1999, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[10]  P. Kittipanya-ngam,et al.  The effect of texture representations on AAM performance , 2006, 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'06).

[11]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Object recognition from local scale-invariant features , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[12]  Xuelong Li,et al.  Texture representation in AAM using Gabor wavelet and local binary patterns , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[13]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Invariant Scattering Convolution Networks , 2012, IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence.

[14]  Stefanos Zafeiriou,et al.  HOG active appearance models , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[15]  Xinbo Gao,et al.  Gabor texture in active appearance models , 2009, Neurocomputing.

[16]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Improving Appearance Model Matching Using Local Image Structure , 2003, IPMI.

[17]  Stefanos Zafeiriou,et al.  Robust Discriminative Response Map Fitting with Constrained Local Models , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[18]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  A Generalized Local Binary Pattern Operator for Multiresolution Gray Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification , 2001, ICAPR.

[19]  Bo Li,et al.  Active appearance models using statistical characteristics of Gabor based texture representation , 2013, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[20]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[21]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Localizing Parts of Faces Using a Consensus of Exemplars , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[22]  Deva Ramanan,et al.  Face detection, pose estimation, and landmark localization in the wild , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[23]  Maja Pantic,et al.  Generic Active Appearance Models Revisited , 2012, ACCV.

[24]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[25]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Snakes: Active contour models , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[26]  Petros Maragos,et al.  Adaptive and constrained algorithms for inverse compositional Active Appearance Model fitting , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[27]  Tai Sing Lee,et al.  Image Representation Using 2D Gabor Wavelets , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[28]  Stefanos Zafeiriou,et al.  Bayesian Active Appearance Models , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[29]  Norbert Krüger,et al.  Face recognition by elastic bunch graph matching , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing.

[30]  Stefanos Zafeiriou,et al.  Menpo: A Comprehensive Platform for Parametric Image Alignment and Visual Deformable Models , 2014, ACM Multimedia.

[31]  Stefanos Zafeiriou,et al.  Robust and efficient parametric face alignment , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[32]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Interactive Facial Feature Localization , 2012, ECCV.

[33]  Ralph Gross,et al.  Generic vs. person specific active appearance models , 2005, Image Vis. Comput..

[34]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  On representing edge structure for model matching , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[35]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Appearance Models , 1998, ECCV.

[36]  Simon Baker,et al.  Active Appearance Models Revisited , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[37]  Michael J. Black,et al.  EigenTracking: Robust Matching and Tracking of Articulated Objects Using a View-Based Representation , 1996, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[38]  Maja Pantic,et al.  Gauss-Newton Deformable Part Models for Face Alignment In-the-Wild , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[39]  Maja Pantic,et al.  Optimization Problems for Fast AAM Fitting in-the-Wild , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[40]  Maja Pantic,et al.  Empirical analysis of cascade deformable models for multi-view face detection , 2013, Image Vis. Comput..

[41]  Fernando De la Torre,et al.  Supervised Descent Method and Its Applications to Face Alignment , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[42]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  An Iterative Image Registration Technique with an Application to Stereo Vision , 1981, IJCAI.

[43]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  From Few to Many: Illumination Cone Models for Face Recognition under Variable Lighting and Pose , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[44]  Bjarne K. Ersbøll,et al.  Wedgelet Enhanced Appearance Models , 2004, 2004 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop.

[45]  Stefanos Zafeiriou,et al.  Automatic Construction of Deformable Models In-the-Wild , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[46]  Stefanos Zafeiriou,et al.  A Semi-automatic Methodology for Facial Landmark Annotation , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops.

[47]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  SIFT Flow: Dense Correspondence across Different Scenes , 2008, ECCV.

[48]  Stefanos Zafeiriou,et al.  Subspace Learning from Image Gradient Orientations , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[49]  Yannick Berthoumieu,et al.  Bidirectional Composition on Lie Groups for Gradient-Based Image Alignment , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[50]  Gregory D. Hager,et al.  Efficient Region Tracking With Parametric Models of Geometry and Illumination , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[51]  Maja Pantic,et al.  Active Orientation Models for Face Alignment In-the-Wild , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[52]  Peter Kovesi,et al.  Image Features from Phase Congruency , 1995 .

[53]  Simon Baker,et al.  Equivalence and efficiency of image alignment algorithms , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[54]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[55]  Yaniv Taigman,et al.  Descriptor Based Methods in the Wild , 2008 .

[56]  Sridha Sridharan,et al.  Fourier Lucas-Kanade Algorithm , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[57]  Simon Baker,et al.  Lucas-Kanade 20 Years On: A Unifying Framework , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.