Dynamic causal modelling of effective connectivity during perspective taking in a communicative task

Previous studies have shown that taking into account another person's perspective to guide decisions is more difficult when their perspective is incongruent from one's own compared to when it is congruent. Here we used dynamic causal modelling (DCM) for functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate effective connectivity between prefrontal and posterior brain regions in a task that requires participants to take into account another person's perspective in order to guide the selection of an action. Using a new procedure to score model evidence without computationally costly estimation, we conducted an exhaustive search for the best of all possible models. The results elucidate how the activity in the areas from our previously reported analysis (Dumontheil et al., 2010) are causally linked and how the connections are modulated by both the social as well as executive task demands of the task. We find that the social demands modulate the backward connections from the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) more strongly than the forward connections from the superior occipital gyrus (SOG) and the medial temporal gyrus (MTG) to the MPFC. This was also the case for the backward connection from the MTG to the SOG. Conversely, the executive task demands modulated the forward connections of the SOG and the MTG to the MPFC more strongly than the backward connections. We interpret the results in terms of hierarchical predictive coding.

[1]  Karl J. Friston The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  Ewald Moser,et al.  Multi-subject analyses with dynamic causal modeling , 2010, NeuroImage.

[3]  R. Kikinis,et al.  Middle and inferior temporal gyrus gray matter volume abnormalities in first-episode schizophrenia: an MRI study. , 2006, The American journal of psychiatry.

[4]  Diane M. Beck,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in biasing competition in the human brain , 2009, Vision Research.

[5]  V. Neugebauer,et al.  Modulation of medial prefrontal cortical activity using in vivo recordings and optogenetics , 2012, Molecular Brain.

[6]  Frank Van Overwalle,et al.  A dissociation between social mentalizing and general reasoning , 2011, NeuroImage.

[7]  C. Frith,et al.  Mechanisms of social cognition. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Post hoc Bayesian model selection , 2011, NeuroImage.

[9]  Josef Perner,et al.  Do visual perspective tasks need theory of mind? , 2006, NeuroImage.

[10]  Emery N. Brown,et al.  Distinct Regions of Right Temporo-Parietal Junction Are Selective for Theory of Mind and Exogenous Attention , 2009, PloS one.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing dynamic causal models , 2004, NeuroImage.

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing Families of Dynamic Causal Models , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Post-hoc selection of dynamic causal models , 2012, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  C. Frith,et al.  The Neural Basis of Mentalizing , 2006, Neuron.

[15]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamic Causal Models for Fmri Nonlinear Dynamic Causal Models for Fmri Nonlinear Dynamic Causal Models for Fmri , 2022 .

[16]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Neural correlates of anchoring-and-adjustment during mentalizing , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  I. Apperly Mindreaders: The Cognitive Basis of "Theory of Mind" , 2010 .

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling for fMRI: A two-state model , 2008, NeuroImage.

[19]  John Suckling,et al.  Sample Size Estimation for Comparing Parameters Using Dynamic Causal Modeling , 2012, Brain Connect..

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling , 2010, NeuroImage.

[21]  J. Duncan The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain: mental programs for intelligent behaviour , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  D G Altman,et al.  Statistics notes: Transformations, means, and confidence intervals , 1996, BMJ.

[23]  Nadim Joni Shah,et al.  Neural Representations of Self versus Other: Visual-Spatial Perspective Taking and Agency in a Virtual Ball-tossing Game , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  K. Zilles,et al.  Neural Correlates of First-Person Perspective as One Constituent of Human Self-Consciousness , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  D. Samson,et al.  There is more to mind reading than having theory of mind concepts: new directions in theory of mind research , 2010 .

[26]  E. Miller,et al.  Response to Comment on "Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up Control of Attention in the Prefrontal and Posterior Parietal Cortices" , 2007, Science.

[27]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Superior Temporal SulcusIt's My Area: Or Is It? , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Leo L. Lui,et al.  Functional response properties of neurons in the dorsomedial visual area of New World monkeys (Callithrix jacchus). , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  C. Frith,et al.  Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[30]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  C. Summerfield,et al.  An information theoretical approach to prefrontal executive function , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Statistics Notes: Transforming data , 1996 .

[33]  Uta Frith,et al.  Theory of mind , 2001, Current Biology.

[34]  Iroise Dumontheil,et al.  Function and localization within rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  F. Overwalle Social cognition and the brain: a meta-analysis. , 2009 .

[36]  Iroise Dumontheil,et al.  Developmental Differences in the Control of Action Selection by Social Information , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  Elliot T. Berkman,et al.  Evidence for social working memory from a parametric functional MRI study , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Maneesh C. Patel,et al.  Distinct frontal systems for response inhibition, attentional capture, and error processing , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Joaquín M. Fuster,et al.  Executive frontal functions , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  E. Brown,et al.  The role of prediction in social neuroscience , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[41]  A. Wagner,et al.  Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Cognitive Control and Right Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex: Reflexive Reorienting, Motor Inhibition, and Action Updating , 2022 .

[42]  Adam Qureshi,et al.  Why are there limits on theory of mind use? Evidence from adults’ ability to follow instructions from an ignorant speaker , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[43]  C. Frith,et al.  Social Cognition in Humans , 2007, Current Biology.

[44]  Rebecca Saxe,et al.  Reading minds versus following rules: Dissociating theory of mind and executive control in the brain , 2006, Social neuroscience.

[45]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Stochastic dynamic causal modelling of fMRI data: Should we care about neural noise? , 2012, NeuroImage.

[46]  J. Fuster Prefrontal Cortex , 2018 .

[47]  Thomas J. Ross,et al.  Neuroanatomical dissociation between bottom–up and top–down processes of visuospatial selective attention , 2006, NeuroImage.

[48]  M. Raichle,et al.  Searching for a baseline: Functional imaging and the resting human brain , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[49]  N. Epley,et al.  Reflexively mindblind: Using theory of mind to interpret behavior requires effortful attention , 2010 .

[50]  Iroise Dumontheil,et al.  Taking perspective into account in a communicative task , 2010, NeuroImage.

[51]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[52]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Variational free energy and the Laplace approximation , 2007, NeuroImage.

[53]  D. Barr,et al.  Taking Perspective in Conversation: The Role of Mutual Knowledge in Comprehension , 2000, Psychological science.

[54]  A. Clark Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[55]  Swann Pichon,et al.  Similarities and differences in perceiving threat from dynamic faces and bodies. An fMRI study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[56]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Network discovery with DCM , 2011, NeuroImage.

[57]  D. Barr,et al.  Limits on theory of mind use in adults , 2003, Cognition.

[58]  R. Kikinis,et al.  Middle and inferior temporal gyrus gray matter volume abnormalities in chronic schizophrenia: an MRI study. , 2004, The American journal of psychiatry.