The use of direct current to cause selective block of large fibres in peripheral nerves.

The effect of direct current on the propagated compound action potential in a cutaneous branch of the radial nerve of the dog was studied and a convenient method for applying electrical current to a nerve is described. Changes in the flow of blocking current, even when these were made slowly during a period of 5-10 sec, caused stimulation of the nerve. The method was satisfactory for producing differential nerve block within the myelinated fibres. It was confirmed that direct current could be used to eliminate selectively the group II/III potentials. When these potentials had been eliminated for a period of 5 min the mean height of the group IV potentials was reduced to 65% of the control value, and their conduction velocity was decreased by 10%. Relatively small variations in current flow caused a marked change in conduction. In the early stages of block, frequent relatively large reductions in current flow were necessary to produce a constant response and it was impossible to cause a stable effect on conduction until the blocking current had been applied for at least 1 min. Because of nerve damage the method is unsuitable for clinical use.

[1]  P. Matthews,et al.  The relative sensitivity of muscle nerve fibres to procaine , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  P. Kenmore,et al.  The effect of ischemia on nerve conduction. , 1967, Experimental neurology.

[3]  A. McComas,et al.  Electrical signs of nervous activity , 1971 .

[4]  S. W. Kuffler,et al.  Small‐nerve junctional potentials. The distribution of small motor nerves to frog skeletal muscle, and the membrane characteristics of the fibres they innervate * , 1953, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  P. Nathan,et al.  Differential nerve block by sodium‐free and sodium‐deficient solutions , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  J. Coote,et al.  The response of some sympathetic neurones to volleys in various afferent nerves , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  P. Nathan,et al.  Some factors concerned in differential nerve block by local anaesthetics , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  David P. C. Lloyd,et al.  NEURON PATTERNS CONTROLLING TRANSMISSION OF IPSILATERAL HIND LIMB REFLEXES IN CAT , 1943 .

[9]  A. Paintal,et al.  Effects of temperature on conduction in single vagal and saphenous myelinated nerve fibres of the cat. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  G. H. Bishop,et al.  THE AFFERENT FUNCTIONS OF NON-MYELINATED OR C FIBERS , 1935 .

[11]  K. Casey,et al.  Observations on anodal polarization of cutaneous nerve. , 1969, Brain research.

[12]  E. A. Bower,et al.  The activity of post‐ganglionic sympathetic nerves to the uterus of the rabbit , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  A. Paintal,et al.  Block of conduction in mammalian myelinated nerve fibres by low temperatures. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  J. Whitwam,et al.  Evoked activity in efferent sympathetic nerves in response to peripheral nerve stimulation in the dog. , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Reflex activity in the cervical and lumbar sympathetic trunk induced by unmyelinated somatic afferents. , 1970, Brain research.

[16]  P. Nathan,et al.  Effects of phenol on nervous conduction , 1960, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  C. Shealy,et al.  Physiological evidence of bilateral spinal projections of pain fibers in cats and monkeys. , 1966, Journal of neurosurgery.

[18]  H. S. Gasser,et al.  THE RÔLE OF FIBER SIZE IN THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A NERVE BLOCK BY PRESSURE OR COCAINE , 1929 .

[19]  S. W. Kuffler,et al.  The small-nerve motor system to skeletal muscle. , 1947, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  P. Wall,et al.  Presynaptic hyperpolarization: a role for fine afferent fibres , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  A. Guz,et al.  The role of non‐myelinated vagal afferent fibres from the lungs in the genesis of tachypnoea in the rabbit , 1971, Journal of Physiology.