Marginal fitness contributions of nonessential genes in yeast.

Analysis of the complete genome sequence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae confirms and extends earlier evidence that a majority of yeast genes are not essential, at least under laboratory conditions. Many fail to yield a discernible mutant phenotype even when disrupted. Genes not subject to natural selection would accumulate inactivating mutations, so these "cryptic" genes must have functions that are overlooked by the standard methods of yeast genetics. Two explanations seem possible: (i) They have important functions only in environments not yet duplicated in the laboratory and would have conditional phenotypes if tested appropriately. (ii) They make small, but significant, contributions to fitness even under routine growth conditions, but the effects are not large enough to be detected by conventional methods. We have tested the second "marginal benefit" hypothesis by measuring the fitnesses of a random collection of disruption mutants in direct competition with their wild-type progenitor. A substantial majority of mutant strains that lack obvious defects nevertheless are at a significant selective disadvantage just growing on rich medium under normal conditions. This result has important implications for efforts to understand the functions of novel genes revealed by sequencing projects.

[1]  T. Ohta Mutational pressure as the main cause of molecular evolution and polymorphism , 1974, Nature.

[2]  C. Paquin,et al.  Frequency of fixation of adaptive mutations is higher in evolving diploid than haploid yeast populations , 1983, Nature.

[3]  L. Breeden,et al.  Regulation of the yeast HO gene. , 1985, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[4]  M. Goebl,et al.  Most of the yeast genomic sequences are not essential for cell growth and division , 1986, Cell.

[5]  D. Dykhuizen Experimental Studies of Natural Selection in Bacteria , 1990 .

[6]  R. Lenski,et al.  Long-Term Experimental Evolution in Escherichia coli. I. Adaptation and Divergence During 2,000 Generations , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[7]  J. Brookfield Can genes be truly redundant? , 1992, Current Biology.

[8]  B. Dujon,et al.  The complete DNA sequence of yeast chromosome III , 1992, Nature.

[9]  P. Ross-Macdonald,et al.  Large-scale analysis of gene expression, protein localization, and gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1994, Genes & development.

[10]  R. Durbin,et al.  2.2 Mb of contiguous nucleotide sequence from chromosome III of C. elegans , 1994, Nature.

[11]  D Botstein,et al.  Genetic footprinting: a genomic strategy for determining a gene's function given its sequence. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Y. Ip,et al.  Transcriptional Regulation: : Converting an activator into a repressor , 1995, Current Biology.

[13]  Tomoko Ohta,et al.  The neutral theory is dead. The current significance and standing of neutral and nearly neutral theories , 1996 .

[14]  G. Rubin,et al.  The Role of the Genome Project in Determining Gene Function: Insights from Model Organisms , 1996, Cell.

[15]  M. Johnston,et al.  Towards a complete understanding of how a simple eukaryotic cell works. , 1996, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[16]  D Botstein,et al.  Functional Analysis of the Genes of Yeast Chromosome V by Genetic Footprinting , 1996, Science.

[17]  B. Dujon The yeast genome project: what did we learn? , 1996, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[18]  M. Kreitman,et al.  The neutral theory is dead. Long live the neutral theory. , 1996, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[19]  H. M. Duttweiler A highly sensitive and non-lethal β-galactosidase plate assay for yeast , 1996 .

[20]  S. Oliver A network approach to the systematic analysis of yeast gene function. , 1996, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[21]  J. A. Mckenzie,et al.  Asymmetry--where evolutionary and developmental genetics meet. , 1996, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[22]  R. Lenski,et al.  Punctuated Evolution Caused by Selection of Rare Beneficial Mutations , 1996, Science.

[23]  J. Brookfield Genetic redundancy: Screening for selection in yeast , 1997, Current Biology.

[24]  T. Jukes,et al.  The neutral theory of molecular evolution. , 2000, Genetics.