Systematic Approach for Large-Scale, Rapid, Dilapidation Surveys of Historic Masonry Buildings

Dilapidation surveys may require extensive resources to achieve detailed accounts of damage for intervention purposes or may involve only limited resources but be restricted to an extremely rapid assessment (e.g., post-earthquake, life-safety inspection). Neither provides a holistic, cost-effective approach for evaluating the general health of a large number of structures, as is needed for urban planning, historic designation determination, and risk assessment due to adjacent construction work. To overcome this limitation, index images are introduced for a systematic approach for rapidly conducting large-scale, dilapidation surveys of historic masonry buildings. This method, the University College Dublin Inspection Method (UCDIM), is tested against both a detailed inspection and an alternative rapid approach to determine accuracy and resource intensiveness through its application by three inspectors of various levels of experience to six buildings in the city centre of Dublin, Ireland. The UCDIM provided a damage ranking of ρ = 0.94 for all inspectors, regardless of experience, except when painted or rendered facades were included. The UCDIM, compared with detailed inspection, provided a high level of reliability, cost-savings of approximately 90% and several months of time savings since interior access was not required.

[1]  J. Santamarina,et al.  Closure of "Particle Shape Effects on Packing Density, Stiffness, and Strength: Natural and Crushed Sands" , 2006 .

[2]  Ad Straub,et al.  Dutch standard for condition assessment of buildings , 2009 .

[3]  R. H. Myers,et al.  STAT 319 : Probability & Statistics for Engineers & Scientists Term 152 ( 1 ) Final Exam Wednesday 11 / 05 / 2016 8 : 00 – 10 : 30 AM , 2016 .

[4]  Debra F. Laefer,et al.  A new multi-parallel condition assessment scale for estimating tunnel-induced damage , 2008 .

[5]  Great Britain. Foreign and Commonwealth Office,et al.  Convention for the Protection of the Architectural Heritage of Europe : Granada, 3 October 1985 , 1985 .

[6]  Felipe Buill Pozuelo,et al.  Generation of virtual models of cultural heritage , 2012 .

[7]  Debra F. Laefer,et al.  Prediction and Assessment of Ground Movement and Building Damage Induced by Adjacent Excavation , 2001 .

[8]  Debra F. Laefer,et al.  Reliability of Crack Detection Methods for Baseline Condition Assessments , 2010 .

[9]  A. Martinelli,et al.  Building vulnerability assessment and damage scenarios in Celano (Italy) using a quick survey data-based methodology , 2008 .

[10]  Thalia Anagnos,et al.  Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings for Potential Seismic Hazards , 1989 .

[11]  Henrique Lorenzo,et al.  Monitoring and Assessing Structural Damage in Historic Buildings , 2008 .

[12]  Stuart P. D. Gill,et al.  A Comprehensive Analysis of Building Damage in the 12 January 2010 Mw7 Haiti Earthquake Using High-Resolution Satellite and Aerial Imagery , 2011 .

[13]  Ivor H. Seeley Building Surveys, Reports and Dilapidations , 1985 .

[14]  Jack Bowyer Guide to domestic building surveys , 1971 .

[15]  E. Reinoso,et al.  A Simplified Method for Vulnerability Assessment of Dwelling Buildings and Estimation of Damage Scenarios in Catalonia, Spain , 2006 .

[16]  Yung Yau,et al.  Achieving Sustainable Urban Renewal in Hong Kong: Strategy for Dilapidation Assessment of High Rises , 2012 .

[17]  N. Yastikli Documentation of cultural heritage using digital photogrammetry and laser scanning , 2007 .

[18]  Erik Brandt,et al.  Assessment of building conditions , 2002 .

[19]  C. V. Anderson,et al.  The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) , 2002 .

[20]  David B. Peraza Condition Assessment of Buildings , 2006 .

[21]  Murat Yakar,et al.  Importance of digital close-range photogrammetry in documentation of cultural heritage , 2007 .

[22]  G. Grünthal European Macroseismic Scale 1998 , 1998 .

[23]  G. E. Torp-Petersen,et al.  Geotechnical investigation and assessment of potential building damage arising from ground movements: CrossRail , 2001 .

[24]  Asce,et al.  Guideline for Structural Condition Assessment of Existing Buildings , 2000 .