From Drift to Draft: International Institutional Responses to the Global Digital Divide

The global digital divide, denoting the patterns of uneven distribution of information and communication technologies (ICTs) worldwide, emerged as a constant concern during the last two decades. Going beyond the minimal requirements of physical connectivity, it points to an underlying concern of digital inclusion differentials of citizens in developing countries, the so-called “information poor.” This chapter aims at addressing this with reference to the international institutional structures and their current efforts. After assessing the categories of people that are affected the most by the digital gap and the range of opportunities available to them in the context of globalization, special attention will be given to the overlapping concerns shaping the international agenda with regard to ICT adoption. The creation of international bodies such as Sustainable Development Networking Programme (SDNP), Digital Opportunity Taskforce (DOT), and Information for Development Program (InfoDev) will be discussed together with the redefinition of the digital access problem as a ”universal service” and the emergence of specific endeavors for reducing global digital inequalities.

[1]  Gili S. Drori Information Society as a Global Policy Agenda: What Does It Tell Us About the Age of Globalization? , 2007 .

[2]  Emilio Paolucci,et al.  Urban Versus Regional Divide: Comparing and Classifying Digital Divide , 2005, TCGOV.

[3]  Progress on the global digital divide: an ethical perspective based on Amartya Sen’s capabilities model , 2009, Ethics and Information Technology.

[4]  Joo-Young Jung,et al.  Exploring the Digital Divide , 2001, Commun. Res..

[5]  Margaret M. Lloyd,et al.  Virtual Kids of the 21st Century: Understanding the Children in Schools Today , 2001 .

[6]  Gill Kirkup,et al.  ‘Getting Our Hands on It’: Gendered Inequality in Access to Information and Communications Technologies , 2001 .

[7]  Ming-te Lu Digital Divide in Developing Countries , 2001 .

[8]  David J. Gunkel Second Thoughts: Toward a Critique of the Digital Divide , 2003, New Media Soc..

[9]  J. Cooper,et al.  The digital divide: the special case of gender , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[10]  K. Hacker,et al.  Ethical gaps in studies of the digital divide , 2003, Ethics and Information Technology.

[11]  M. Rice,et al.  Information and Communication Technologies and the Global Digital Divide: Technology Transfer, Development, and Least Developing Countries , 2003 .

[12]  Fernando Lera-López,et al.  Disparities in ICT adoption: A multidimensional approach to study the cross-country digital divide , 2009 .

[13]  L. Jean Camp,et al.  Universal Service in a Ubiquitous Digital Network , 2001, Ethics and Information Technology.

[14]  Jeremy Moss,et al.  ‘Power and the digital divide’ , 2002, Ethics and Information Technology.

[15]  Jack Linchuan Qiu,et al.  Internet Connectedness and Inequality , 2001, Commun. Res..

[16]  H. Bonfadelli The Internet and Knowledge Gaps , 2002 .

[17]  E. Parker Closing the digital divide in rural America , 2000 .

[18]  Lisa J. Servon,et al.  Community Technology Centers: Narrowing the Digital Divide in Low-Income, Urban Communities , 2001 .

[19]  Nichole Pinkard,et al.  How the Perceived Masculinity and/or Femininity of Software Applications Influences Students' Software Preferences , 2005 .

[20]  J. Cooper,et al.  Gender and computers : understanding the digital divide , 2003 .

[21]  J. James From the relative to the absolute digital divide in developing countries , 2009 .

[22]  Ananda Mitra,et al.  Gender and Computer Use in an Academic Institution: Report from a Longitudinal Study , 2000 .

[23]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Understanding the complexity of electronic government: Implications from the digital divide literature , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[24]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Reconsidering Political and Popular Understandings of the Digital Divide , 2004, New Media Soc..

[25]  Christa Reiser,et al.  Social stratification and the digital divide , 2003 .