Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference

Emotions operate along the dimension of approach and aversion, and it is reasonable to assume that orienting behavior is intrinsically linked to emotionally involved processes such as preference decisions. Here we describe a gaze 'cascade effect' that was present when human observers were shown pairs of human faces and instructed to decide which face was more attractive. Their gaze was initially distributed evenly between the two stimuli, but then gradually shifted toward the face that they eventually chose. Gaze bias was significantly weaker in a face shape discrimination task. In a second series of experiments, manipulation of gaze duration, but not exposure duration alone, biased observers' preference decisions. We thus conclude that gaze is actively involved in preference formation. The gaze cascade effect was also present when participants compared abstract, unfamiliar shapes for attractiveness, suggesting that orienting and preference for objects in general are intrinsically linked in a positive feedback loop leading to the conscious choice.

[1]  W. James II.—WHAT IS AN EMOTION ? , 1884 .

[2]  R L FANTZ,et al.  The origin of form perception. , 1961, Scientific American.

[3]  S. Schachter The Interaction of Cognitive and Physiological Determinants of Emotional State , 1964 .

[4]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[5]  J. Laird Self-attribution of emotion: the effects of expressive behavior on the quality of emotional experience. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. , 1980, Science.

[7]  M. Patterson A sequential functional model of nonverbal exchange. , 1982 .

[8]  Peter E. Morris,et al.  Imagery and consciousness , 1983 .

[9]  R. Zajonc Emotion and facial efference: a theory reclaimed. , 1985, Science.

[10]  R. Held,et al.  Preferential-looking assessment of fusion and stereopsis in infants aged 1-6 months. , 1985, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science.

[11]  C. Kleinke Gaze and eye contact: a research review. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  George Mandler,et al.  Nonspecific Effects of Exposure on Stimuli That Cannot Be Recognized , 1987 .

[13]  G. Butterworth,et al.  What minds have in common is space : Spatial mechanisms serving joint visual attention in infancy , 1991 .

[14]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Neural organization for the long-term memory of paired associates , 1991, Nature.

[15]  M. V. von Grünau,et al.  The Detection of Gaze Direction: A Stare-In-The-Crowd Effect , 1995, Perception.

[16]  A. Nakamura,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of the assessment of facial attractiveness , 1998, Neuroreport.

[17]  N. Porter,et al.  Stress hormones and brain aging: adding injury to insult? , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  N. Emery,et al.  The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze , 2000, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[19]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Oncogenes: Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde , 2001, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[21]  M. Cabanac What is emotion? , 2002, Behavioural Processes.