Effect of pacing chamber and atrioventricular delay on acute systolic function of paced patients with congestive heart failure. The Pacing Therapies for Congestive Heart Failure Study Group. The Guidant Congestive Heart Failure Research Group.

BACKGROUND Previous studies of pacing therapy for dilated congestive heart failure (CHF) have not established the relative importance of pacing site, AV delay, and patient heterogeneity on outcome. These variables were compared by a novel technique that evaluated immediate changes in hemodynamic function during brief periods of atrial-synchronous ventricular pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS Twenty-seven CHF patients with severe left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and LV conduction disorder were implanted with endocardial pacing leads in the right atrium and right ventricle (RV) and an epicardial lead on the LV and instrumented with micromanometer catheters in the LV, aorta, and RV. Patients in normal sinus rhythm were stimulated in the RV, LV, or both ventricles simultaneously (BV) at preselected AV delays in a repeating 5-paced/15-nonpaced beat sequence. Maximum LV pressure derivative (LV+dP/dt) and aortic pulse pressure (PP) changed immediately at pacing onset, increasing at a patient-specific optimal AV delay in 20 patients with wide surface QRS (180+/-22 ms) and decreasing at short AV delays in 5 patients with narrower QRS (128+/-12 ms) (P<0.0001). Overall, BV and LV pacing increased LV+dP/dt and PP more than RV pacing (P<0.01), whereas LV pacing increased LV+dP/dt more than BV pacing (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS In this population, CHF patients with sufficiently wide surface QRS benefit from atrial-synchronous ventricular pacing, LV stimulation is required for maximum acute benefit, and the maximum benefit at any site occurs with a patient-specific AV delay.

[1]  M. Block,et al.  The Pacing Therapies for Congestive Heart Failure (PATH-CHF) study: rationale, design, and endpoints of a prospective randomized multicenter study. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  Lili Liu,et al.  Experimental validation of pulse contour methods for estimating stroke volume at pacing onset , 1998, Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Vol.20 Biomedical Engineering Towards the Year 2000 and Beyond (Cat. No.98CH36286).

[3]  E. Foster,et al.  Acute Effects of Intraoperative Multisite Ventricular Pacing on Left Ventricular Function and Activation/Contraction Sequence in Patients with Depressed Ventricular Function , 1998, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[4]  D. Kass,et al.  Ventricular function in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy is improved by VDD pacing at left but not right ventricular sites , 1998 .

[5]  J. Blanc,et al.  Evaluation of different ventricular pacing sites in patients with severe heart failure: results of an acute hemodynamic study. , 1997, Circulation.

[6]  A. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Evaluation of acute dual-chamber pacing with a range of atrioventricular delays on cardiac performance in refractory heart failure. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  R. Salo,et al.  Acute Hemodynamic Improvement by Pacing in Patients with Severe Congestive Heart Failure , 1997, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[8]  A. Lazarus,et al.  Multisite Pacing for End‐Stage Heart Failure: Early Experience , 1996, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[9]  M. Fisher,et al.  Dual-chamber pacing with a short atrioventricular delay in congestive heart failure: a randomized study. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  M. Rosenqvist,et al.  Results of atrioventricular synchronous pacing with optimized delay in patients with severe congestive heart failure. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  A. Tajik,et al.  Mechanism of hemodynamic improvement by dual-chamber pacing for severe left ventricular dysfunction: an acute Doppler and catheterization hemodynamic study. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  H. Xiao,et al.  Nature of ventricular activation in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: evidence for bilateral bundle branch block. , 1994, British heart journal.

[13]  A. Auricchio,et al.  Improvement of Cardiac Function in Patients with Severe Congestive Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease by Dual Chamber Pacing with Shortened AV Delay , 1993, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[14]  M. Hochleitner,et al.  Dual-chamber pacing in dilated cardiomyopathy , 1993, The Lancet.

[15]  D. Gibson,et al.  Effects of dual-chamber pacing with short atrioventricular delay in dilated cardiomyopathy , 1992, The Lancet.

[16]  H. Hörtnagl,et al.  Long-term efficacy of physiologic dual-chamber pacing in the treatment of end-stage idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  C. Ng,et al.  Usefulness of physiologic dual-chamber pacing in drug-resistant idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  D. Kass,et al.  Comparative influence of load versus inotropic states on indexes of ventricular contractility: experimental and theoretical analysis based on pressure-volume relationships. , 1987, Circulation.

[19]  M. Josephson,et al.  Endocardial activation of left bundle branch block. , 1984, Circulation.

[20]  R A Heinle,et al.  Localized disorders in myocardial contraction. Asynergy and its role in congestive heart failure. , 1967, The New England journal of medicine.