The effects of isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine on maternal hemodynamic changes post spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery: A prospective cohort study

Background Spinal anesthesia is a form of regional anesthesia frequently used in various lower abdominal, orthopedic, obstetric operations such as a cesarean delivery. The most common local anesthetic used for spinal anesthesia in obstetric and non-obstetric surgery is bupivacaine which can be utilized as an isobaric or hyperbaric solution, producing differences in maternal hemodynamic changes. Against this backdrop, the study aims to compare the effects of isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine on maternal hemodynamic alterations after administering spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery at Gandhi Memorial Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Methods A hospital-based prospective cohort study design was employed for the period December 1, 2017 to January 30, 2018. A total of 100 parturient were involved, with one group exposed to isobaric bupivacaine and the other to hyperbaric bupivacaine to observe their effects on maternal hemodynamic changes post spinal anesthesia. The participants were selected through systematic random sampling. Data analysis was performed using SPSS (version 20) through descriptive statistic, independent sample t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, Fisher’s exact test, and Chi-square test were used. P values of <0.05 was assumed as statistically significant for all tests. Results The incidence of hypotension was found to be greater in isobaric than hyperbaric groups (82% vs. 60% respectively; p = 0.015). No statistical significant differences were found in mean arterial pressure value at baseline, but, statistically significant changes were observed among the groups (p <0.05) at all study timing after spinal anesthesia, except at 30thmin. No statistically significant differences were seen in the mean heart rate variability after spinal anesthesia at all periods, except the 15th minute (p = 0.033). A greater rate of vasopressor was used in the isobaric group as compared to the hyperbaric group (36% vs. 14% respectively; p = 0.011). Conclusion Baricity is a significant factor in maternal hemodynamic changes in the parturient for elective cesarean section. Isobaric bupivacaine produces greater change in blood pressure and incidence of hypotension and entails a greater vasopressor requirement than hyperbaric bupivacaine after spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section.

[1]  D. Chestnut Chestnut's Obstetric Anesthesia: Principles and Practice , 2019 .

[2]  N. Abedini,et al.  Baricity of Bupivacaine on Maternal Hemodynamics after Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2017, Iranian journal of medical sciences.

[3]  H. Goma,et al.  Fluid preloading versus ephedrine in the management of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery: a comparative study , 2016 .

[4]  M. Kaya,et al.  Morphological examination of the resting egg structure of 3 cladoceran species [Ceriodaphnia quadrangula (O. F. Müller, 1785), Daphnia longispina (O. F. Müller, 1776), and D. magna Straus, 1820] , 2014 .

[5]  M. Helmi,et al.  Comparison of Intrathecal Use of Isobaric and Hyperbaric Bupivacaine during Lower Abdomen Surgery , 2014 .

[6]  M. Toptaş,et al.  A comparison of the effects of hyperbaric and isobaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia on hemodynamics and heart rate variability. , 2014, Turkish journal of medical sciences.

[7]  M. Hussain,et al.  Effects Of Isobaric Bupivacaine In Endoscopic Urological Surgeries Under Spinal Anaethesia , 2012 .

[8]  M. Columb,et al.  Does the Baricity of Bupivacaine Influence Intrathecal Spread in the Prolonged Sitting Position Before Elective Cesarean Delivery? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study , 2011, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[9]  J. Fuller Anesthesia Student Survival Guide – A Case-Based Approach , 2010 .

[10]  D. Birnbach,et al.  Anesthesia for Obstetrics , 2010 .

[11]  R. Röhrig,et al.  Hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: identification of risk factors using an anesthesia information management system , 2009, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[12]  G. Iohom,et al.  Regional anesthesia techniques for ambulatory orthopedic surgery , 2008, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.

[13]  M. Baciarello,et al.  Effects of baricity of 0.5% or 0.75% levobupivacaine on the onset time of spinal anesthesia: a randomized trial , 2008, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[14]  P. K. Morley-Forster,et al.  L’influence de la vitesse d’injection de bupivacaïne hyperbare sur la rachianesthésie chez les parturientes : une étude randomisée , 2007 .

[15]  M. Columb,et al.  The Effect of Posture and Baricity on the Spread of Intrathecal Bupivacaine for Elective Cesarean Delivery , 2005, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[16]  T. Meuser,et al.  Change in anaesthetic practice for Caesarean section in Germany , 2005, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[17]  W. Urmey Spinal anaesthesia for outpatient surgery. , 2003, Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology.

[18]  Axel Junger,et al.  The incidence and risk factors for hypotension after spinal anesthesia induction: an analysis with automated data collection. , 2002, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[19]  P. Buczkowski,et al.  Evaluation of pre-emptive intramuscular phenylephrine and ephedrine for reduction of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension during Caesarean section. , 2001, British journal of anaesthesia.

[20]  M. Pinaud,et al.  Intrathecal bupivacaine in humans: influence of volume and baricity of solutions. , 1999, Anesthesiology.

[21]  L. Critchley,et al.  The influence of baricity on the haemodynamic effects of intrathecal bupivacaine 0.5% , 1999, Anaesthesia.

[22]  M. Richardson,et al.  Intrathecal Hypobaric Versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine with Morphine for Cesarean Section , 1998, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[23]  H. Kehlet,et al.  Double-blind Evaluation of Intrathecal Hyperbaric and Glucose-free Bupivacaine on Analgesia and Cardiovascular Function , 1986, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.