Biodiesel production by the methylic-alkaline and ethylic-enzymatic routes: Discussion of some environmental aspects

Abstract A comparative environmental impact analysis of the soybean biodiesel production by two different technologies is run in this study. The production routes evaluated were the alkali-catalyzed (catalyst: sodium hydroxide) methylic transesterification and enzyme-catalyzed (catalyst: lipase) ethylic transesterification. The study includes the simulation of the biodiesel production process with the software Aspen HYSYS, from AspenTech Inc., and a subsequent comparative analysis of the main environmental impacts observed in each case, based on the application of two approaches: analysis of the Principles of Green Chemistry and calculation of some sustainability metrics. Results indicated a better environmental performance for the enzymatic route, in almost all the analyzed issues, what proves that this route is an excellent option for future industrial applications, regarding safety and sustainability.

[2]  Naoko Ellis,et al.  Assessment of four biodiesel production processes using HYSYS.Plant. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[3]  A. Martins,et al.  Simulation and life cycle assessment of process design alternatives for biodiesel production from waste vegetable oils , 2010 .

[4]  Anita Ramli,et al.  Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil using bifunctional heterogeneous solid catalysts , 2013 .

[5]  Suani Teixeira Coelho,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of soybean-based biodiesel in Europe: comparing grain, oil and biodiesel import from Brazil , 2015 .

[6]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  Integrated environmental assessment of biodiesel production from soybean in Brazil , 2010 .

[7]  E. H. Pryde,et al.  Transesterification kinetics of soybean oil 1 , 1986 .

[8]  M. Viana,et al.  Biodegradability and methane production potential of glycerol generated by biodiesel industry. , 2012, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[9]  P. Anastas,et al.  Green Chemistry , 2018, Environmental Science.

[10]  Pekka Leskinen,et al.  Current limits of life cycle assessment framework in evaluating environmental sustainability – case of two evolving biofuel technologies , 2013 .

[11]  Naoko Ellis,et al.  Simulation, Case Studies and Optimization of a Biodiesel Process with a Solid Acid Catalyst , 2007 .

[12]  Stelvia Matos,et al.  Brazilian biofuels and social exclusion: established and concentrated ethanol versus emerging and dispersed biodiesel , 2009 .

[13]  Fernando L.P. Pessoa,et al.  Comparison between Biodiesel Production from Soybean Oil and Palm Oil with Ethanol: Design and Economic Evaluation , 2015 .

[14]  E. H. Pryde,et al.  Variables affecting the yields of fatty esters from transesterified vegetable oils , 1984 .

[15]  Pekka Leskinen,et al.  Social life cycle assessment of biodiesel production at three levels: a literature review and development needs , 2013 .

[16]  R. Gani,et al.  New group contribution method for estimating properties of pure compounds , 1994 .

[17]  M. Dubé,et al.  Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: 1. Process design and technological assessment. , 2003, Bioresource technology.

[18]  Rafiqul Gani,et al.  An integrated computer-aided system for generation and evaluation of sustainable process alternatives , 2003 .

[19]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Biogenic greenhouse gas emissions linked to the life cycles of biodiesel derived from European rapeseed and Brazilian soybeans , 2008 .

[20]  Julie Zimmerman,et al.  Design Through the 12 Principles of Green Engineering , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[21]  Yomi Watanabe,et al.  Continuous production of biodiesel fuel from vegetable oil using immobilized Candida antarctica lipase , 2000 .

[22]  Ayhan Demirbas,et al.  Biodegradability of Biodiesel and Petrodiesel Fuels , 2008 .

[23]  P. Piumsomboon,et al.  LCA studies comparing biodiesel synthesized by conventional and supercritical methanol methods , 2009 .

[24]  Shigemi Kagawa,et al.  Environmental and economic performance of a biodiesel plant using waste cooking oil. , 2015 .

[25]  Loreto Iglesias,et al.  A life cycle assessment comparison between centralized and decentralized biodiesel production from raw sunflower oil and waste cooking oils. , 2012 .

[26]  Saiful Islam,et al.  Advances in solid-catalytic and non-catalytic technologies for biodiesel production , 2014 .

[27]  Jesús Arauzo,et al.  Prediction of normalized biodiesel properties by simulation of multiple feedstock blends. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[28]  J. Goodrum.  Volatility and boiling points of biodiesel from vegetable oils and tallow , 2002 .

[29]  Jürgen Krahl,et al.  The Biodiesel Handbook , 2005 .

[30]  Fernando L.P. Pessoa,et al.  Design and Economic Evaluation of Alternatives to Effluents Treatment on Biodiesel Production from Soybean Oil and Palm Oil , 2015 .

[31]  Stig Irving Olsen,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions and energy balance of biodiesel production from microalgae cultivated in photobioreactors in Denmark: a life-cycle modeling , 2016 .

[32]  Ajay K. Ray,et al.  Performance Improvement and Dynamical Behaviour Analysis of a Cascade of Two CSTRs , 2007 .

[33]  V. Marulanda,et al.  Biodiesel production by supercritical methanol transesterification: process simulation and potential environmental impact assessment. , 2012 .

[34]  Nhan Nguyen,et al.  “Green engineering: Defining the principles”— resdts from the sandestin conference , 2003 .

[35]  H. von Blottnitz,et al.  A life-cycle comparison between inorganic and biological catalysis for the production of biodiesel , 2008 .