Fiber-reinforced Composite Space Maintainers: A Literature Review of their Survival Rate

Premature loss of posterior primary teeth necessitates space maintaining to prevent space loss and compromising the dentition. Conventional stainless steel band-and-loop space maintainer (BL-SM) is a non-invasive device commonly used to maintain space after the early loss of a single deciduous tooth until the permanent tooth erupts. However, these devices require laboratory work, consume time, and are relatively expensive. Clinically, they tend to fracture, bend or debond under occlusal forces, and they are not considered esthetic. Thus, alternatives to the BL-SM have been investigated. The fiber-reinforced composite space maintainer (FRC-SM) has various advantages and has been suggested as an alternative to the BL-SM. The aim of this review is to explore the survival rate of FRC-SM reported in the literature. We have found a wide variation in the reported results, with promising results shown for FRC-SM, especially over short periods. Therefore, longer follow-up periods, placement techniques and clinical effectiveness with respect to this type of space maintainer need to be further evaluated.

[1]  Zuhal Kirzioğlu,et al.  Success of reinforced fiber material space maintainers. , 2004, Journal of dentistry for children.

[2]  Mahesh Ramakrishnan,et al.  Survival rate of different fixed posterior space maintainers used in Paediatric Dentistry – A systematic review , 2019, The Saudi dental journal.

[3]  P. Ashley,et al.  Space maintainers in the primary and mixed dentition – a clinical guide , 2018, BDJ.

[4]  R. Yeluri,et al.  Fiber reinforced composite loop space maintainer: An alternative to the conventional band and loop , 2012, Contemporary Clinical Dentistry.

[5]  Betul Kargul,et al.  Glass fiber-reinforced composite resin as fixed space maintainers in children: 12-month clinical follow-up. , 2005, Journal of dentistry for children.

[6]  A. Peutzfeldt,et al.  Bond strength of a sealant to primary and permanent enamel: phosphoric acid versus self-etching adhesive. , 2004, Pediatric dentistry.

[7]  G. Kulkarni,et al.  Development and testing of fiber-reinforced composite space maintainers. , 2009, Journal of dentistry for children.

[8]  C. Anuj,et al.  Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of glass fiber reinforced composite resin as a space maintainer and its comparison with the conventional band and loop space maintainer. An in vivo study. , 2012, Minerva stomatologica.

[9]  R. Grande,et al.  Effect of cariogenic challenge on bond strength of adhesive systems to sound and demineralized primary and permanent enamel. , 2014, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[10]  J. Jaiswal,et al.  'Metal to resin': a comparative evaluation of conventional band and loop space maintainer with the fiber reinforced composite resin space maintainer in children. , 2014, Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry.

[11]  P. Ashley,et al.  Methods of space maintenance for premature loss of a primary molar: a review , 2018, European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry.

[12]  Shantanu S Deshpande,et al.  Survival of Bonded Space Maintainers: A Systematic Review , 2018, International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[13]  Management of the Developing Dentition and Occlusion in Pediatric Dentistry. , 2017, Pediatric dentistry.

[14]  Z. Kırzıoglu,et al.  Clinical Success of Fiber-reinforced Composite Resin as a Space Maintainer. , 2017, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[15]  M. Saravanakumar,et al.  Fiber technology in space maintainer: a clinical follow-up study. , 2013, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[16]  N. Tuloglu,et al.  Evaluation of survival of 3 different fixed space maintainers. , 2012, Pediatric dentistry.

[17]  M. Qudeimat,et al.  Longevity of Band and Loop Space Maintainers Using Glass Ionomer Cement: A Prospective Study , 2009, European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry.

[18]  KL Girish Babu,et al.  Glass fiber-reinforced composite resin as a space maintainer: a clinical study. , 2008, Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry.

[19]  T. El-Bialy,et al.  Dental arch space changes following premature loss of primary first molars: a systematic review. , 2008, Pediatric dentistry.

[20]  G. Brar,et al.  Ribbond as an esthetic space maintainer , 2012 .