Negative Attitudes toward minimalistic Robots with intragroup communication styles

With robots becoming more prevalent in daily life, it is important to understand human attitudes toward robots not only when humans interact with them directly, as most research examines, but also when people are indirectly exposed to robots performing nonsocial tasks (e.g., cleaning) in their vicinity. Because minimalistic robots are at present more likely to be found in households than human-like robots, this study examined human reactions to nonsocial, nonanthropomorphic robots. The specific focus of this study was on how robot communication style during human-robot co-location affects human perceptions of a group of robots. This paper also evaluates the relationship between participants' scores on the Negative Attitudes toward Robots Scale (NARS) and their behavioral response to and perceptions of robots in their environment. Our results suggest that robot communication style did not affect perceptions of robots and that responses on the NARS may not translate directly to behavior toward robots.

[1]  P. N. Shapiro,et al.  Role of out-group cues in determining social identity. , 1984 .

[2]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human–robot interaction , 2006, AI & SOCIETY.

[3]  Maartje M. A. de Graaf,et al.  The relation between people's attitude and anxiety towards robots in human-robot interaction , 2013, 2013 IEEE RO-MAN.

[4]  Wan Ling Chang,et al.  The effect of group size on people's attitudes and cooperative behaviors toward robots in interactive gameplay , 2012, 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[5]  Friederike Eyssel,et al.  When a Robot’s Group Membership Matters , 2013, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[6]  M. Biernat,et al.  Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  S. Asch Forming impressions of personality. , 1946, Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

[8]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Does Japan really have robot mania? Comparing attitudes by implicit and explicit measures , 2008, AI & SOCIETY.

[9]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Occurrence versus moderation of the automatic attitude activation effect : reply to Fazio , 1993 .

[10]  D. Campbell Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities , 2007 .

[11]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour , 1971 .

[12]  Elena Márquez Segura,et al.  How Do You Like Me in This: User Embodiment Preferences for Companion Agents , 2012, IVA.

[13]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots , 2006, AI & SOCIETY.

[14]  Richard J. Crisp,et al.  Imagining Intergroup Contact Can Improve Intergroup Attitudes , 2007 .

[15]  Melvin Manis,et al.  Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments. , 1994 .

[16]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  The pleasure of receiving a head massage from a robot , 2013, 2013 IEEE RO-MAN.

[17]  Jacquline L. Cottle,et al.  Individual–Group Discontinuity in Group–Individual Interactions: Does Size Matter? , 2009 .

[18]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Judging a bot by its cover: An experiment on expectation setting for personal robots , 2010, 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[19]  P. Zimbardo,et al.  Induced hearing deficit generates experimental paranoia. , 1982, Science.

[20]  David M. Grayson,et al.  You looking at me? , 1999, Nature.

[21]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[22]  Friederike Eyssel,et al.  Minimal Group - Maximal Effect? Evaluation and Anthropomorphization of the Humanoid Robot NAO , 2011, ICSR.

[23]  Frédéric Kaplan,et al.  Who is Afraid of the Humanoid? Investigating Cultural Differences in the Acceptance of Robots , 2004, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[24]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. , 2007, Psychological review.

[25]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Judging a bot by its cover: an experiment on expectation setting for personal robots , 2010, HRI 2010.