Predicting growth and sequestration of carbon by plantations growing in regions of low-rainfall in southern Australia

Abstract In regions of Australia of low–medium rainfall (500–800 mm/year), there is growing community and land-owner support for re-planting trees to achieve multiple environmental objectives, particularly amelioration of soil salinity. Sequestration of carbon by newly established trees is not only another important environmental benefit, but also a potential commercial benefit. To obtain estimates of carbon sequestered by species of commercial potential in such regions, we calibrated the carbon (C) accounting model FullCAM to Eucalyptus cladocalyx and Corymbia maculata plantations. This was achieved by harvesting trees of a range in sizes to determine the allometric relationships that most accurately predict biomass and stem density from measures of stem diameter. Predictions of stem diameter were obtained from a forest growth model (3-PG) previously calibrated for these two species. By applying these predictions of changes in stem diameter as the stand matures in our allometric relationships, we estimated changes in partitioning of biomass (between stem, branches, bark, foliage and roots) and stem wood density as the stand matures under scenarios of 500, 600 and 750 mm mean annual rainfall. We found that for both species, regardless of annual rainfall, throughout the rotation 37–50% of carbon sequestered in the total tree biomass was in the stem, 18–27% in both branches and roots, and the remainder in foliage or bark. However, rate of accumulation of carbon was dependent on annual rainfall, with average annual rate of sequestration of carbon in tree biomass and litter during the first rotation of E. cladocalyx (or C. maculata) increasing from 3.68 (or 4.17) to 4.72 (or 4.86) Mg C ha−1 yr−1 as annual rainfall increased from about 500 to 750 mm. Although it was predicted that decomposition negated any accumulation of debris between successive rotations, carbon was predicted to accumulate in sawlog products, given that assumed rates of product decomposition were slightly less than their rate of accumulation. This resulted in a slight increase (

[1]  T. Kira,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PLANT FORM-THE PIPE MODEL THEORY : II. FURTHER EVIDENCE OF THE THEORY AND ITS APPLICATION IN FOREST ECOLOGY , 1964 .

[2]  A. Prokushkin,et al.  Critical analysis of root : shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes , 2006 .

[3]  D. Cown,et al.  Wood property variations in an old-crop stand of radiata pine. , 1980 .

[4]  A. Cowie,et al.  Developing general allometric relationships for regional estimates of carbon sequestration - an example using 'Eucalyptus pilularis' from seven contrasting sites , 2005 .

[5]  Trevor H. Booth,et al.  Net carbon dioxide emissions from alternative firewood-production systems in Australia , 2006 .

[6]  Keryn I. Paul,et al.  Predicted change in soil carbon following afforestation or reforestation, and analysis of controlling factors by linking a C accounting model (CAMFor) to models of forest growth (3PG), litter decomposition (GENDEC) and soil C turnover (RothC) , 2003 .

[7]  T. Hinckley,et al.  Foliar Weight and Area Related to Current Sapwood Area in Oak , 1979 .

[8]  T. Kira,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PLANT FORM-THE PIPE MODEL THEORY : I.BASIC ANALYSES , 1964 .

[9]  M. Feller.  Biomass and nutrient distribution in two eucalypt forest ecosystems , 1980 .

[10]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  Application of the pipe model theory to predict canopy leaf area. , 1982 .

[11]  R. Lange,et al.  A non-destructive method for estimating the weight of forage on shrubs. , 1976 .

[12]  T. Booth,et al.  Calibration of the forest growth model 3-PG to eucalypt plantations growing in low rainfall regions of Australia , 2007 .

[13]  J. Walker,et al.  Australian Soil and Land Survey Field Handbook , 1984 .

[14]  P. Polglase,et al.  Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis of a Carbon Accounting Model to Stem Wood Density and Partitioning of Biomass for Eucalyptus globulus and Pinus Radiata , 2006, New Forests.

[15]  T. Gregoire,et al.  Modeling relative error in stem basal area estimates. , 1990 .

[16]  P. Polglase,et al.  Calibration of the RothC model to turnover of soil carbon under eucalypts and pines , 2004 .

[17]  Leaf area estimation from three allometrics in Eucalyptus globulus plantations , 1997 .

[18]  Jerome K. Vanclay,et al.  Evaluating a growth model for forest management using continuous forest inventory data , 1995 .

[19]  Keryn I. Paul,et al.  Change in soil carbon following afforestation , 2002 .

[20]  I. Brown,et al.  Uncertainty in the biomass of Amazonian forests: An example from Rondônia, Brazil , 1995 .

[21]  M. Kaufmann,et al.  The relationship of leaf area and foliage biomass to sapwood conducting area in four subalpine forest tree species , 1981 .

[22]  G. Richards,et al.  Development of a carbon accounting model (FullCAM Vers. 1.0) for the Australian continent , 2004 .

[23]  James K. Brown,et al.  Comparison of Tree Biomass Estimators—DBH and Sapwood Area , 1978 .

[24]  P. Polglase,et al.  Prediction of decomposition of litter under eucalypts and pines using the FullCAM model , 2004 .

[25]  C. Raymond,et al.  Non-destructive sampling for basic density in Eucalyptus globulus and E. nitens , 1998 .

[26]  P. Snowdon,et al.  A ratio estimator for bias correction in logarithmic regressions , 1991 .

[27]  B. Parresol.  Assessing Tree and Stand Biomass: A Review with Examples and Critical Comparisons , 1999, Forest Science.

[28]  H. Madgwick,et al.  Biomass relationships in stands of Eucalyptus species , 1991 .

[29]  Edgar Robichaud,et al.  The applicability of the pipe model theory for the prediction of foliage biomass in trees from natural, untreated black spruce stands , 1992 .