On preferences and doing the right thing: Satisfaction with advantageous inequity when cognitive processing is limited

We examine outcome satisfaction in situations in which people receive better outcomes than comparable other persons. Building on classical and modern social psychological theories, we argue that when reacting to these arrangements of advantageous inequity, judging the advantage is quick and easy as preferences are primary. We further propose that adjusting this appraisal requires cognitive resources as it entails integrating fairness concerns with the initial preference appraisal. Extending the literature on cognitive busyness, we therefore predict that people should be more satisWed with advantageous inequity when cognitive processing is strongly—as opposed to weakly—limited. Findings across several diVerent experimental paradigms support our predictions. Taken together, our Wndings shed light on the psychological processes underlying the intriguing interplay between egoism- and fairnessbased considerations when evaluating outcomes, as well as on more general preference and adjustment processes.

[1]  Adams Js.  Towards an understanding of inequity , 1963 .

[2]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  J. S. Adams,et al.  EFFECTS OF WAGE INEQUITIES ON WORK QUALITY. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[4]  T. Beauchamp.  Philosophical Ethics: An Introduction to Moral Philosophy , 1982 .

[5]  L. Thompson,et al.  Social Utility and Decision Making in Interpersonal Contexts , 1989 .

[6]  Daniel T. Gilbert,et al.  Thinking backward: some curable and incurable consequences of cognitive busyness , 1989 .

[7]  Carsten K. W. De Dreu,et al.  Effects of gain-loss frames on satisfaction with self-other outcome-differences , 1994 .

[8]  Roger E. Kirk,et al.  Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). , 1995 .

[9]  J. Tedeschi,et al.  Public versus private reactions to positive inequity. , 1976 .

[10]  Elizabeth E. Umphress,et al.  Is virtue its own reward? Self-sacrificial decisions for the sake of fairness , 2002 .

[11]  Jaap Ham,et al.  Smart and easy: Co-occurring activation of spontaneous trait inferences and spontaneous situational inferences , 2003 .

[12]  J. Bargh,et al.  Individual construct accessibility, person memory, and the recall-judgment link: The case of information overload. , 1985 .

[13]  Don A. Moore,et al.  Self-Interest, Automaticity, and the Psychology of Conflict of Interest , 2004 .

[14]  L. Ross,et al.  Self-interest and fairness in problems of resource allocation: allocators versus recipients. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Alois Stutzer,et al.  Introducing Procedural Utility: Not Only What, But Also How Matters , 2002 .

[16]  R. Kirk.  Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[17]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[18]  D. Stapel,et al.  The effects of diffuse and distinct affect. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Keith P. Sentis,et al.  Fairness and preference , 1979 .

[20]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Wage Inequities, Productivity and Work Quality , 1963 .

[21]  Daniel M. Wegner,et al.  The hyperaccessibility of suppressed thoughts. , 1992 .

[22]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Handbook of Social Cognition , 1993 .

[23]  K. Bos,et al.  What are we talking about when we talk about no-voice procedures? On the psychology of the fair outcome effect , 1999 .

[24]  H. Wilke,et al.  How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  J. S. Adams,et al.  The relationship of worker productivity to cognitive dissonance about wage inequities. , 1962 .

[26]  P. Jackson,et al.  Justice : views from the social sciences , 1988 .

[27]  H. Kelley,et al.  The social psychology of groups , 1960 .

[28]  J. S. Adams,et al.  TOWARD AN UNDERSTANDING OF INEQUITY. , 1963, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[29]  William G. Austin,et al.  Internal standards revisited: Effects of social comparisons and expectancies on judgments of fairness and satisfaction , 1980 .

[30]  N. Epley,et al.  Egocentric Ethics , 2004 .

[31]  J. de Houwer,et al.  Associative learning of likes and dislikes: a review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  K. van den Bos,et al.  Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. , 2002 .

[33]  E. Walster,et al.  REACTIONS TO CONFIRMATIONS AND DISCONFIRMATIONS OF EXPECTANCIES OF EQUITY AND INEQUITY , 1974 .

[34]  Olivier Corneille,et al.  Do not prime hawks with doves: the interplay of construct activation and consistency of social value orientation on cooperative behavior. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  R. Zajonc.  Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[36]  Neal J. Roese,et al.  Twenty years of bogus pipeline research : a critical review and meta-analysis , 1993 .

[37]  E. Suchman,et al.  The American Soldier: Adjustment During Army Life. , 1949 .

[38]  B. Buunk,et al.  Social comparison, equality, and relationship satisfaction: Gender differences over a ten-year period , 1989 .

[39]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Inequity In Social Exchange , 1965 .

[41]  N. Epley,et al.  Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  W. Hays.  Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. , 1983 .

[43]  David M. Messick,et al.  Equity theory: Psychological and sociological perspectives , 1983 .

[44]  H. Wilke,et al.  Evaluating Outcomes by Means of the Fair Process Effect: Evidence for Different Processes in Fairness and Satisfaction Judgments , 1998 .

[45]  D. Gilbert,et al.  On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. , 1988 .

[46]  Johan C. Karremans,et al.  On the Psychology of the Advantaged: How People React to Being Overpaid , 2008 .