An analysis of soil moisture dynamics using multi-year data from a network of micrometeorological observation sites

Abstract Soil moisture data, obtained from four AmeriFlux sites in the US, were examined using an ecohydrological framework. Sites were selected for the analysis to provide a range of plant functional type, climate, soil particle size distribution, and time series of data spanning a minimum of two growing seasons. Soil moisture trends revealed the importance of measuring water content at several depths throughout the rooting zone; soil moisture at the surface (0–10 cm) was approximately 20–30% less than that at 50–60 cm. A modified soil moisture dynamics model was used to generate soil moisture probability density functions at each site. Model calibration results demonstrated that the commonly used soil matric potential values for finding the vegetation stress point and field content may not be appropriate, particularly for vegetation adapted to a water-controlled environment. Projections of future soil moisture patterns suggest that two of the four sites will become severely stressed by climate change induced alterations to the precipitation regime.

[1]  L. Sloan,et al.  Modeled regional climate change and California endemic oak ranges. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  J. Blair,et al.  Rainfall Variability, Carbon Cycling, and Plant Species Diversity in a Mesic Grassland , 2002, Science.

[3]  I. Noy-Meir,et al.  Desert Ecosystems: Environment and Producers , 1973 .

[4]  Christian Onof,et al.  Rainfall modelling using Poisson-cluster processes: a review of developments , 2000 .

[5]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  On the seasonal dynamics of mean soil moisture , 2002 .

[6]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  Soil Water Balance and Ecosystem Response to Climate Change , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[7]  C. Priestley,et al.  On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters , 1972 .

[8]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  Seasonal and interannual variability of energy fluxes over a broadleaved temperate deciduous forest in North America , 2000 .

[9]  Amilcare Porporato,et al.  The ecohydrological role of soil texture in a water‐limited ecosystem , 2001 .

[10]  T. C. Johns,et al.  On Modification of Global Warming by Sulfate Aerosols , 1997 .

[11]  G. Goldstein,et al.  Converging patterns of uptake and hydraulic redistribution of soil water in contrasting woody vegetation types. , 2004, Tree physiology.

[12]  D. Hillel.  Environmental soil physics , 1998 .

[13]  B. Law,et al.  Age-related changes in ecosystem structure and function and effects on water and carbon exchange in ponderosa pine. , 2004, Tree physiology.

[14]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Simulating past and future dynamics of natural ecosystems in the United States , 2003 .

[15]  Francesco Laio,et al.  Plants in water-controlled ecosystems: active role in hydrologic processes and response to water stress: IV. Discussion of real cases , 2001 .

[16]  T. A. Black,et al.  Predicting the onset of net carbon uptake by deciduous forests with soil temperature and climate data: a synthesis of FLUXNET data , 2005, International journal of biometeorology.

[17]  Jianwu Tang,et al.  How soil moisture, rain pulses, and growth alter the response of ecosystem respiration to temperature , 2004 .

[18]  B. Law,et al.  Carbon and water vapor exchange of an open-canopied ponderosa pine ecosystem , 1999 .

[19]  David I. Stannard,et al.  Comparison of Penman‐Monteith, Shuttleworth‐Wallace, and Modified Priestley‐Taylor Evapotranspiration Models for wildland vegetation in semiarid rangeland , 1993 .

[20]  J. Monteith.  Evaporation and environment. , 1965, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[21]  K. G. McNaughton,et al.  Using the Penman-Monteith equation predictively , 1984 .

[22]  K. Eckhardt,et al.  Plant parameter values for models in temperate climates , 2003 .

[23]  Albert Arking,et al.  The radiative effects of clouds and their impact on climate , 1991 .

[24]  U. Hatch,et al.  Potential consequences of climate variability and change for the Southeastern United States , 2001 .

[25]  M. Schaap,et al.  ROSETTA: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions , 2001 .

[26]  E. Miles,et al.  POTENTIAL CONSEQUENCES OF CLIMATE VARIABILITY AND CHANGE FOR THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST , 2001 .

[27]  Philip B. Duffy,et al.  Uncertainty in projections of streamflow changes due to climate change in California , 2005 .

[28]  M. Schaap,et al.  Comparison of Models for Indirect Estimation of Water Retention and Available Water in Surface Soils , 2004 .

[29]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  Ecohydrology of Water-Controlled Ecosystems: Soil Moisture and Plant Dynamics , 2005 .

[30]  J. Sarmiento,et al.  Oceanic ventilation and biogeochemical cycling: Understanding the physical mechanisms that produce realistic distributions of tracers and productivity , 2004 .

[31]  V. Isham,et al.  Probabilistic modelling of water balance at a point: the role of climate, soil and vegetation , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[32]  V. Singh,et al.  Evaluation and generalization of radiation-based methods for calculating evaporation , 2000 .

[33]  N. Kiang,et al.  How plant functional-type, weather, seasonal drought, and soil physical properties alter water and energy fluxes of an oak-grass savanna and an annual grassland , 2004 .

[34]  K. Hibbard,et al.  An analysis of soil respiration across northern hemisphere temperate ecosystems , 2005 .

[35]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Modeling Root Water Uptake in Hydrological and Climate Models. , 2001 .

[36]  Luca Ridolfi,et al.  WATER BALANCE AT A POINT: THE IMPACT OF CLIMATE, SOIL AND VEGETATION , 1999 .

[37]  Y. Mualem,et al.  A New Model for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity , 1976 .

[38]  R. Burgy,et al.  The Relationship between oak tree roots and groundwater in fractured rock as determined by tritium tracing , 1964 .

[39]  C. D. Allen,et al.  Equilibrium, Potential and Actual Evaporation from Cropped Surfaces in Southern Ontario , 1973 .

[40]  R. Pielke.  Influence of the spatial distribution of vegetation and soils on the prediction of cumulus Convective rainfall , 2001 .

[41]  Beverly E. Law,et al.  Climatic versus biotic constraints on carbon and water fluxes in seasonally drought‐affected ponderosa pine ecosystems , 2004 .

[42]  Luca Ridolfi,et al.  Plants in water-controlled ecosystems: active role in hydrologic processes and response to water stress: II. Probabilistic soil moisture dynamics , 2001 .

[43]  Yoshinobu Sato,et al.  Water cycling in a Bornean tropical rain forest under current and projected precipitation scenarios , 2004 .

[44]  Anne W. Nolin,et al.  Mapping “At Risk” Snow in the Pacific Northwest , 2005 .

[45]  Peter M. Cox,et al.  The Sensitivity of Global Climate Model Simulations to the Representation of Soil Moisture Heterogeneity , 2003 .

[46]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes , 1996, Oecologia.

[47]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  A comparison of methods for determining forest evapotranspiration and its components: sap-flow, soil water budget, eddy covariance and catchment water balance , 2001 .

[48]  Amilcare Porporato,et al.  A review of soil moisture dynamics: From rainfall infiltration to ecosystem response , 2005 .

[49]  W. James Shuttleworth,et al.  Has the Priestley-Taylor Equation Any Relevance to Forest Evaporation? , 1979 .