Knowledge in Images and Sounds: Informative, Narrative and Aesthetic Analysis of the Video for MOOC

The virtual courses developed by higher education institutions incorporate the video format as one of the most used resources in the delivery of their online training offer. Within the different types of audiovisual productions found in MOOCs, the introductory or presentation video of the courses has become an illustrative piece of the new edu-communicative context of distance education, when articulating, in the same work, informative, didactic, and advertising content. The objective of this research work is to study the triple communicative nature of this innovative format following a specific methodology of audiovisual textual analysis. For this, 420 videos of this type of promotional video, belonging to 105 universities and educational centres that have developed MOOC courses for the Miríadax platform, are analysed. After checking the results of the formal characteristics, content structures, discursive techniques, and audiovisual language components of the videos, it is concluded that they are mostly pieces linked to the staging style of the classroom, but that, by enriching the visual appearance of a master lesson with audiovisual resources, take advantage of the narrative, aesthetic, and creative potential of audiovisual and advertising communication to capture the attention of the student-spectator, inform about the characteristics of the courses, offer valuable educational content, and generate an image of the brand for the institution responsible for producing the course.

[1]  Andrés Chiappe,et al.  Representation of knowledge in digital educational environments: A systematic review of literature , 2019, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology.

[2]  Lloyd S. Davis,et al.  Storytelling: the soul of science communication , 2019, Journal of Science Communication.

[3]  Formatos audiovisuales emergentes para MOOCs: diseño informativo, educativo y publicitario , 2018 .

[4]  Aldo Gordillo,et al.  Efectividad de los MOOC para docentes en el uso seguro de las TIC , 2019 .

[5]  José Ignacio Aguaded Gómez,et al.  Criterios de calidad para la valoración y gestión de MOOC , 2015 .

[6]  Devayani Tirthali,et al.  Why do Institutions Offer MOOCs , 2014 .

[7]  Cristina Rigutto,et al.  The landscape of online visual communication of science , 2017 .

[8]  Susanne Hecker,et al.  Storytelling for narrative approaches in citizen science: towards a generalized model , 2019, Journal of Science Communication.

[9]  Timothy John White,et al.  MOOCs: A diminution, evolution or revolution in University Teaching? , 2013, 2013 IEEE 63rd Annual Conference International Council for Education Media (ICEM).

[10]  L. Kondratenko,et al.  MOOC As an Enabler for Achieving Professional Competence: Problem-Solving Aspect , 2021, Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn..

[11]  Yarden Katz Against storytelling of scientific results , 2013, Nature Methods.

[12]  Manuel Gértrudix Barrio,et al.  Realización de vídeo educativo: análisis de la producción audiovisual de los Mooc de Urjcx , 2017 .

[13]  Joshua Green,et al.  YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture , 2009 .

[14]  J. García-Avilés,et al.  Online video on climate change: a comparison between television and web formats , 2017 .

[15]  Jose Luis Salmeren Silvera,et al.  Comparative between quality assessment tools for MOOCs: ADECUR vs Standard UNE 66181: 2012 , 2015, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.

[16]  Manuel Gértrudix Barrio,et al.  Narrativa audiovisual: producción de vídeos colaborativos para MOOC , 2016 .

[17]  C. Lüthi,et al.  Delivering WASH education at scale: evidence from a global MOOC series , 2021, Environment and Urbanization.

[18]  Yuxiang Chen,et al.  A blended learning model supported by MOOC/SPOC, Zoom, and Canvas in a project-based academic writing course , 2021 .

[19]  Michael F. Dahlstrom Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  C. Seemiller,et al.  Generation Z: Educating and Engaging the Next Generation of Students , 2017 .

[21]  Esteban Vázquez-Cano,et al.  Analysis and implications of the impact of MOOC movement in the scientific community: JCR and Scopus (2010-13) , 2015 .

[22]  Manuel Gértrudix Barrio,et al.  Metodología de producción para el desarrollo de contenidos audiovisuales y multimedia para MOOC , 2017 .

[23]  E. L. Meneses,et al.  MOOC in Higher Education from the Students’ Perspective. A Sustainable Model? , 2019, Qualitative and Quantitative Models in Socio-Economic Systems and Social Work.

[24]  Patrick Jermann,et al.  Your click decides your fate: Inferring Information Processing and Attrition Behavior from MOOC Video Clickstream Interactions , 2014, Proceedings of the EMNLP 2014 Workshop on Analysis of Large Scale Social Interaction in MOOCs.

[25]  Avanilde Kemczinski,et al.  Un repositorio digital de contenido fílmico como recurso didáctico , 2015 .

[26]  Jesús Muñoz Morcillo,et al.  Typologies of the Popular Science Web Video , 2015, ArXiv.

[27]  H. Niemi,et al.  Tools, Pedagogical Models, and Best Practices for Digital Storytelling , 2018 .

[28]  Esteban Vázquez Cano,et al.  Análisis e implicaciones del impacto del movimiento MOOC en la comunidad científica: JCR y Scopus (2010-13) , 2015 .

[29]  Dustin J. Welbourne,et al.  Science communication on YouTube: Factors that affect channel and video popularity , 2016, Public understanding of science.