Is the daily use of vacuum erection device for a month before penile prosthesis implantation beneficial? a randomized controlled trial

Patient concerns about penile length after penile prosthesis (PP) implantation for erectile dysfunction (ED) have significant impact on patients and their partners. In addition, corporal fibrosis is associated with difficult PP implantation. The preoperative use of vacuum erectile devices (VED) is an uncommon physical treatment for such concerns. Therefore, the current randomized controlled study assessed two outcomes: whether pre‐operative VED use for a month before surgery would significantly increase flaccid stretched penile length (SPL) on the day of surgery, and facilitate easier corporal dilatation intraoperatively. Fifty‐one patients scheduled for PP implantation for ED were randomized to either intervention group (pre‐operative VED use; 10–15 min/day for ≥30 days; Group A; n = 25), or control group (no intervention; Group B; n = 26). A research assistant (blinded to the treatment assignments) recorded SPL at baseline (initial consultation) and on day of surgery. The surgeons performing the PP implantation (also blinded to the treatment assignments) provided subjective assessments of the ease of corporal dilatation. Baseline patient characteristics, demographics, and comorbidities were the same in both groups. Baseline measurements (SPL‐1) were 10.71 ± 1.28 and 10.87 ± 1.26 cm in Group A and Group B, respectively; and the day of surgery measurements (SPL‐2) were 11.50 ± 1.33 and 11.06 ± 1.34 cm in Group A and Group B, respectively. In terms of outcomes: mean SPL increase in Group A was significantly more by a mean of 0.80 ± 0.38 cm (p < 0.05) compared to Group B; and surgeons’ subjective report of surgical ease indicated smoother corporal dilatation for Group A compared to Group B. VED use (10–15 min/day during the month prior to PP implantation) was associated with significantly increased SPL on day of surgery, and facilitated easier corporal dilatation intraoperatively. Future studies should examine the long‐term outcomes of penile prosthesis implantation after pre‐operative use of vacuum erectile devices.

[1]  Bradley D. Figler,et al.  Preoperative counseling and expectation management for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation , 2017, Translational andrology and urology.

[2]  J. Myers,et al.  Current Management of Penile Implant Infections, Device Reliability, and Optimizing Cosmetic Outcome , 2014, Current Urology Reports.

[3]  L. Rolle,et al.  Prospective analysis of the surgical outcomes and patients' satisfaction rate after the AMS Spectra penile prosthesis implantation. , 2013, Urology.

[4]  D. Brison,et al.  The resurgence of the vacuum erection device (VED) for treatment of erectile dysfunction. , 2013, The journal of sexual medicine.

[5]  E. Salem,et al.  Vacuum Preparation, Optimization of Cylinder Length and Postoperative Daily Inflation Reduces Complaints of Shortened Penile Length Following Implantation of Inflatable Penile Prosthesis , 2013 .

[6]  C. Zippe,et al.  Vacuum erection devices revisited: its emerging role in the treatment of erectile dysfunction and early penile rehabilitation following prostate cancer therapy. , 2012, The journal of sexual medicine.

[7]  L. Lipshultz,et al.  Revision of penile prosthesis surgery after use of penile traction therapy to increase erect penile length: case report and review of the literature. , 2011, The journal of sexual medicine.

[8]  H. Lin,et al.  Vacuum therapy in erectile dysfunction—science and clinical evidence , 2010, International Journal of Impotence Research.

[9]  M. Dineen,et al.  VACUUM PROTOCOL AND CYLINDERS THAT LENGTHEN ALLOW IMPLANTATION OF LONGER INFLATABLE PROTHESES REDUCING COMPLAINTS OF SHORTENED PENILE LENGTH , 2009 .

[10]  P. Ditonno,et al.  Penile Prosthesis: What Should We Do about Complications? , 2008, Advances in urology.

[11]  T. Mostafa,et al.  Couple satisfaction to different therapeutic modalities for organic erectile dysfunction. , 2008, The journal of sexual medicine.

[12]  M. Monga,et al.  A pilot study on the early use of the vacuum erection device after radical retropubic prostatectomy , 2007, BJU international.

[13]  C. Kline,et al.  Surgical technique to maintain penile length after insertion of an inflatable penile prosthesis via infrapubic approach. , 2006, The journal of sexual medicine.

[14]  J. Mulhall,et al.  Serial assessment of efficacy and satisfaction profiles following penile prosthesis surgery. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[15]  Francesco Montorsi,et al.  AMS Three–Piece Inflatable Implants for Erectile Dysfunction: A Long–Term Multi–Institutional Study in 200 Consecutive Patients , 2000, European Urology.

[16]  J. Thrasher,et al.  The use of an external vacuum device to augment a penile prosthesis. , 1997, Techniques in urology.