Adaptive detection mechanisms in globally statistically nonstationary-oriented noise.

Studies have shown that human observers can adapt their detection strategies on the basis of the statistical properties of noisy backgrounds. One common property of such studies is that the backgrounds studied are (or are assumed to be) statistically stationary. Less is known about how humans detect signals in the more complex setting of nonstationary backgrounds. We investigated detection performance in the presence of a globally nonstationary oriented noise background. We controlled for noise-correlation effects by considering a stationary background with a power spectrum matched to the average spectrum of the nonstationary process. Performance of a nonadaptive linear filter that was unable to make use of differences in local statistics yielded constant performance in both the stationary and the nonstationary backgrounds. In contrast, performance of an ideal observer that uses local noise statistics yielded substantially higher (140%) detectability with the nonstationary backgrounds than the stationary ones. Human observers showed significantly higher (33%) detection performance in the nonstationary backgrounds, suggesting that they can adapt their detection mechanisms to the local orientation properties.

[1]  Christoph Hoeschen,et al.  Investigation of image components affecting the detection of lung nodules in digital chest radiography , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[2]  D G Pelli,et al.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[3]  H H Barrett,et al.  Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[4]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Lesion detection in structured noise. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[5]  F. Kingdom,et al.  Sensitivity to orientation modulation in micropattern-based textures , 1995, Vision Research.

[6]  H.H. Barrett,et al.  Model observers for assessment of image quality , 1993, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[7]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. II. Effects of contrast gain control, background variations, and white noise. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[8]  Jie Yao,et al.  Predicting human performance by a channelized Hotelling observer model , 1992, Optics & Photonics.

[9]  H Ghandeharian,et al.  Visual signal detection. I. Ability to use phase information. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  A. Burgess,et al.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. , 2001, Medical physics.

[11]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[12]  M. Webster,et al.  Contrast adaptation and the spatial structure of natural images. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[13]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Model observers for assessment of image quality , 1993 .

[14]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detectability with two noise components: anomalous masking effects. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[15]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination. , 1981, Science.

[16]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. IV. Observer inconsistency. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[17]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Further investigation of the effect of phase spectrum on visual detection in structured backgrounds , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[18]  H. Barlow.  The efficiency of detecting changes of density in random dot patterns , 1978, Vision Research.

[19]  Jay Bartroff,et al.  Automated computer evaluation and optimization of image compression of x-ray coronary angiograms for signal known exactly detection tasks. , 2003, Optics express.

[20]  H. Barrett,et al.  Effect of noise correlation on detectability of disk signals in medical imaging. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. II. Signal-location identification. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[22]  Kenneth E. Weaver,et al.  An Assortment Of Image Quality Indexes For Radiographic Film-Screen Combinations ---Can They Be Resolved? , 1972, Other Conferences.

[23]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Effect of image compression in model and human performance , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[24]  H H Barrett,et al.  Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[25]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. III. Calculation of figures of merit for model observers in statistically nonstationary backgrounds. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[26]  Francis R. Verdun,et al.  Detectability of radiological images: the influence of anatomical noise , 1995, Medical Imaging.

[27]  A E Burgess.  Visual signal detection with two-component noise: low-pass spectrum effects. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[28]  Miguel P. Eckstein,et al.  Image discrimination models predict signal detection in natural medical image backgrounds , 1997, Electronic Imaging.

[29]  H H Barrett,et al.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[30]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  A Practical Guide to Model Observers for Visual Detection in Synthetic and Natural Noisy Images , 2000 .

[31]  Miguel P. Eckstein,et al.  Evaluation of JPEG 2000 encoder options: human and model observer detection of variable signals in X-ray coronary angiograms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  A. Burgess.  Statistically defined backgrounds: performance of a modified nonprewhitening observer model. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.