Syntactic Focusing Structures Influence Discourse Processing

In 5 experiments, we investigated how syntactic focusing structures such as "There was this . . ." and "It was the . . ." influence discourse processing during reading. In Experiment 1, participants read brief stories and continued them by writing sentences of their own. Constituents introduced with a focusing structure were more likely to be referred to in story continuations than were concepts introduced with a neutral determiner (a, an, or the). Probe recognition experiments (2a, 2b, and 3) demonstrated that, when a concept in the subject position was probed immediately, syntactic focus had no effect, but responses were faster than when the probed concept was not in the subject position. When the probe was delayed, syntactically focused concepts were recognized faster than were concepts in the subject position that had not been focused (Experiment 4). These results indicate that syntactic focus increases salience and strengthens the memory trace of concepts in readers' discourse representations.

[1]  A. Cutler Phoneme-monitoring reaction time as a function of preceding intonation contour , 1976 .

[2]  M. Singer,et al.  Thematic Structure and the Integration of Linguistic Information. , 1976 .

[3]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  Cataphoric Devices in Spoken Discourse , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Syntactic Prominence Effects On Discourse Processes , 1993 .

[5]  Nigel Shadbolt Dynamic Aspects of Language Processing , 1984 .

[6]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  The Effect of Focus on Memory for Words in Sentences , 1995 .

[7]  C. Fletcher Markedness and topic continuity in discourse processing , 1984 .

[8]  K. Rayner,et al.  Linguistic focus affects eye movements during reading , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[9]  S. Brédart,et al.  Moses strikes again: Focalization effect on a semantic illusion , 1988 .

[10]  P. Hornby Surface structure and presupposition , 1974 .

[11]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention. , 1988, Journal of memory and language.

[12]  M. Halliday NOTES ON TRANSITIVITY AND THEME IN ENGLISH. PART 2 , 1967 .

[13]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Unheralded Pronouns and Management by Common Ground , 1994 .

[14]  Jerome L. Myers,et al.  Research Design and Statistical Analysis , 1991 .

[15]  J. Fodor,et al.  Semantic focus and sentence comprehension , 1979, Cognition.

[16]  M. Braga,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis , 2018, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2nd Ed..

[17]  S. Brédart,et al.  The Moses illusion: A follow-up on the focalization effect , 1989 .

[18]  J. L. Wagner,et al.  Evaluating information for truthfulness: The effects of logical subordination , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[19]  W. Cooper,et al.  Speech intonation and focus location in matched statements and questions. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Reinhard Blutner,et al.  Sentence processing and lexical access: The influence of the focus-identifying task , 1988 .

[21]  V. M. Holmes,et al.  Syntactic presupposition in sentence comprehension , 1979, Cognition.

[22]  W. Kintsch The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[23]  P. Culicover,et al.  English Focus Constructions and the Theory of Grammar , 1990 .

[24]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  The cataphoric use of the indefinite this in spoken narratives , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[25]  Wietske Vonk,et al.  The use of referential expressions in structuring discourse , 1992 .

[26]  J. K. Bock,et al.  Intonational marking of given and new information: Some consequences for comprehension , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[27]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation , 1969 .

[28]  Robert B. Most,et al.  Information Structure in Sentences: New Information , 1979 .

[29]  Hubert D. Zimmer,et al.  The given-new structure of cleft sentences and their influence on picture viewing , 1981 .

[30]  W. Kintsch How readers construct situation models for stories. The role of suntactic cues and causal inferences , 1992 .