Lifecycle costing sensitivities for zero energy housing in Melbourne, Australia

Minimum energy efficiency standards for new housing are typically informed by regulatory impact statements, underpinned by lifecycle costing (LCC) analysis. While LCC techniques are empirical and testable, such analysis is informed by considerable assumptions on key parameters. These assumptions are often heavily contested in the literature and by built environment stakeholders, but there is limited exploration of their implications within wider policy developments. This paper addresses this gap by analysing the impact of a number of assumptions and their implications within a LCC analysis of zero energy housing options in Victoria, Australia. The results show that changes to assumptions on key parameters have significant impact on LCC outcomes, with associated policy implications. Analysis shows that there is a requirement for a detailed review and debate of the assumptions applied within LCC analysis which is used to inform the development of minimum energy efficiency standards in Australia and internationally. In particular, as housing is a long-lived infrastructure, the issue regarding the use of assumptions based upon historical data or data based upon future predictions is critical to the development of policy and energy efficiency standards.

[1]  Charles L. Choguill,et al.  The search for policies to support sustainable housing , 2007 .

[2]  D. Pearce,et al.  Economic Values and the Natural World , 1995 .

[3]  René M.J. Benders,et al.  New approaches for household energy conservation--In search of personal household energy budgets and energy reduction options , 2006 .

[4]  Angelo Delsante,et al.  A VALIDATION OF THE 'ACCURATE' SIMULATION ENGINE USING BESTEST , 2004 .

[5]  Ralph Horne,et al.  Regulatory potential for increasing small scale grid connected photovoltaic (PV) deployment in Australia , 2011 .

[6]  Françoise Thellier,et al.  Greenhouse gases and building lifetimes , 2013 .

[7]  R. Horne,et al.  Cost efficient low-emission housing: implications for household cash-flows in Melbourne , 2014 .

[8]  Trivess Moore,et al.  Size matters:house size and thermal efficiency as policy strategies to reduce net emissions of new developments , 2012 .

[9]  Riccardo Maria Pulselli,et al.  Energy and emergy based cost–benefit evaluation of building envelopes relative to geographical location and climate , 2009 .

[10]  農林水産奨励会農林水産政策情報センター,et al.  The green book : appraisal and evaluation in central government , 2003 .

[11]  Ralph Horne,et al.  Cost-benefit assessment of energy efficiency investments: Accounting for future resources, savings and risks in the Australian residential sector , 2013 .

[12]  Pernilla Gluch,et al.  The life cycle costing (LCC) approach: a conceptual discussion of its usefulness for environmental decision-making , 2004 .

[13]  R. Goodin,et al.  The Oxford handbook of public policy , 2008 .

[14]  David G. Woodward,et al.  Life cycle costing—Theory, information acquisition and application , 1997 .

[15]  Mohamed Osmani,et al.  Feasibility of zero carbon homes in England by 2016: a house builder's perspective , 2009 .

[16]  Trivess Moore,et al.  The importance of house size in the pursuit of low carbon housing , 2013 .

[17]  Jan Kosny,et al.  Influence of insulation configuration on heating and cooling loads in a continuously used building , 2002 .

[18]  Michael J Tierney,et al.  Measured energy and water performance of an aspiring low energy/carbon affordable housing site in th , 2011 .

[19]  Trivess Moore,et al.  Modelling the through-life costs and benefits of detached zero (net) energy housing in Melbourne, Australia , 2014 .

[20]  Ralph Horne,et al.  Towards global benchmarking for sustainable homes: an international comparison of the energy performance of housing , 2008 .

[21]  Zerrin Yilmaz,et al.  Evaluation of energy efficient design strategies for different climatic zones: Comparison of thermal performance of buildings in temperate-humid and hot-dry climate , 2007 .

[22]  Karen Refsgaard,et al.  Barriers to rational decision-making in environmental planning , 2007 .

[23]  C. Vlek,et al.  A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation , 2005 .

[24]  A. D. Papatsoris,et al.  The economics of photovoltaic stand-alone residential households: A case study for various European and Mediterranean locations , 2000 .

[25]  Andreas Uihlein,et al.  Policy options towards an energy efficient residential building stock in the EU-27 , 2010 .

[26]  R. Garnaut,et al.  The Garnaut Climate Change Review , 2008 .

[27]  Svend Svendsen,et al.  Energy savings in Danish residential building stock , 2006 .

[28]  Bruce Tonn,et al.  State-Level Benefits of Energy Efficiency , 2007 .

[29]  Behdad Moghtaderi,et al.  Effect of thermal mass on the thermal performance of various Australian residential constructions systems , 2008 .

[30]  Joseph P. Morrissey,et al.  Life cycle cost implications of energy efficiency measures in new residential buildings , 2011 .

[31]  W. L. Lee,et al.  Regulatory and voluntary approaches for enhancing building energy efficiency , 2004 .

[32]  Tayfun Uygunoğlu,et al.  LCC analysis for energy-saving in residential buildings with different types of construction masonry , 2011 .

[33]  Melissa M. Bilec,et al.  Impact of lifetime on US residential building LCA results , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[34]  H. Scott Matthews,et al.  One size does not fit all: Averaged data on household electricity is inadequate for residential energy policy and decisions , 2013 .

[35]  J. Burnett,et al.  Analysis of embodied energy use in the residential building of Hong Kong , 2001 .

[36]  Françoise Thellier,et al.  Impact of the lifespan of building external walls on greenhouse gas index , 2013 .

[37]  Martin Peterson,et al.  An Introduction to Decision Theory , 2009 .

[38]  David Coley,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of the effect of occupant behaviour on the energy consumption of passive house dwellings , 2013 .

[39]  Gülten Manioğlu,et al.  Economic evaluation of the building envelope and operation period of heating system in terms of thermal comfort , 2006 .

[40]  R. Ha,et al.  Cost–Benefit Analysis , 2010 .

[41]  N. Stern.  The Economics of Climate Change: Implications of Climate Change for Development , 2007 .

[42]  Veronica Soebarto,et al.  Comfort and energy use in five Australian award-winning houses: regulated, measured and perceived , 2010 .

[43]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .