A proportional 3-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for screening new product projects

It is critically important for companies to screen new product projects before they are launched to the market. So far, many approaches have been developed for tackling the process of screening product innovations. Due to uncertain, vague and incomplete information as well as dynamically complex process regarding to new product development (NPD), a fuzzy linguistic approach employed linguistic assessments and the fuzzy-set-based computation is reasonable for screening new products. However, such a fuzzy linguistic approach faces with various defects and limitations, such as loss of information, failing in considering the aspects related to human nature on uncertain subjective judgments etc. These defects and limitations lead to a dilemma, i.e., it’s very difficult to screen new product projects reasonably and precisely. In this paper, we propose a notion of proportional 3-tuple to represent a linguistic assessment and related ignoring information, and a preference-preserving proportional 3-tuple transformation for the unification of linguistic assessments represented by proportional 3-tuples between two different linguistic term sets. On this basis, a proportional 3-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for screening new product projects is developed. It is shown that the proposed model is flexible to handle uncertain, vague and incomplete information related to screening new product projects. It not only allows evaluators to express their subjective judgments with different confidence levels, but is also able to deal with incomplete linguistic assessments. Ultimately, the proposed model also improves the precision and reasonability of the screening result.

[1]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Design and marketing of new products , 1980 .

[2]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  An empirically derived new product project selection model , 1981 .

[3]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  The impact of new product strategies , 1983 .

[4]  Ulrike de Brentani Do firms need a custom-designed new product screening model? , 1986 .

[5]  R. Cooper,et al.  An Investigation into the New Product Process: Steps, Deficiencies, and Impact , 1986 .

[6]  Ulrike de Brentani Success and Failure in New Industrial Services , 1989 .

[7]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products , 1990 .

[8]  S. Hart,et al.  Where to Now in New Product Development Research , 1992 .

[9]  A. Page Assessing New Product Development Practices and Performance: Establishing Crucial Norms , 1993 .

[10]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  A General Multi-Level Evaluation Process for Hybrid MADM With Uncertainty , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst..

[11]  Dan Dimancescu,et al.  World-Class New Product Development: Benchmarking Best Practices of Agile Manufacturers , 1996 .

[12]  A. Griffin PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices , 1997 .

[13]  Arvind Rangaswamy,et al.  Software Tools for New Product Development , 1997 .

[14]  Soung Hie Kim,et al.  Group decision making procedure considering preference strength under incomplete information , 1997, Comput. Oper. Res..

[15]  R. Calantone,et al.  Are Really New Product Development Projects Harder to Shut Down , 1998 .

[16]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Product Leadership: Creating And Launching Superior New Products , 1998 .

[17]  Muammer Ozer,et al.  A survey of new product evaluation models , 1999 .

[18]  Roger Calantone,et al.  Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in New Product Screening , 1999 .

[19]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Competitiveness of manufacturing firms: an application of fuzzy weighted average , 1999, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[20]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words , 2000, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[21]  Christer Carlsson,et al.  Benchmarking in linguistic importance weighted aggregations , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[22]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  The PDMA toolbook for new product development , 2002 .

[23]  Thomas Åstebro,et al.  Key success factors for technological entrepreneurs' R&D projects , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[24]  Ching-Torng Lin,et al.  A fuzzy-logic-based approach for new product Go/NoGo decision at the front end , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[25]  R. Cooper,et al.  Benchmarking Best NPD Practices—II , 2004 .

[26]  Ching-Torng Lin,et al.  New product go/no-go evaluation at the front end: a fuzzy linguistic approach , 2004, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[27]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Benchmarking Best NPD Practices-III: Driving New-Product Projects to Market Success Is the Focus of This Third in a Three-Part Series , 2004 .

[28]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Incorporating design effort complexity measures in product architectural design and assessment , 2005 .

[29]  Jin-Hsien Wang,et al.  A new version of 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words , 2006, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[30]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  An Evidential-Reasoning-Interval-Based Method for New Product Design Assessment , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[31]  Van-Nam Huynh,et al.  A Linguistic Screening Evaluation Model in New Product Development , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.