The Street Network Evolution of Crowdsourced Maps: OpenStreetMap in Germany 2007-2011

The OpenStreetMap (OSM) project is a prime example in the field of Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI). Worldwide, several hundred thousand people are currently contributing information to the “free” geodatabase. However, the data contributions show a geographically heterogeneous pattern around the globe. Germany counts as one of the most active countries in OSM; thus, the German street network has undergone an extensive development in recent years. The question that remains is this: How does the street network perform in a relative comparison with a commercial dataset? By means of a variety of studies, we show that the difference between the OSM street network for car navigation in Germany and a comparable proprietary dataset was only 9% in June 2011. The results of our analysis regarding the entire street network showed that OSM even exceeds the information provided by the proprietary dataset by 27%. Further analyses show on what scale errors can be reckoned with in the topology of the street network, and the completeness of turn restrictions and street name information. In addition to the analyses conducted over the past few years, projections have additionally been made about the point in time by which the OSM dataset for Germany can be considered “complete” in relative comparison to a commercial dataset.

[1]  A. Turner,et al.  Introduction to neogeography , 2006 .

[2]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Citizens as Voluntary Sensors: Spatial Data Infrastructure in the World of Web 2.0 , 2007, Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res..

[3]  A. Crooks,et al.  Mapping for the Masses , 2009 .

[4]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[5]  S. Schade,et al.  Quality Of Geographic Information Patchworks , 2008 .

[6]  Alexander Zipf,et al.  Generating web-based 3D City Models from OpenStreetMap: The current situation in Germany , 2010, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[7]  Daniel Z. Sui,et al.  The wikification of GIS and its consequences: Or Angelina Jolie's new tattoo and the future of GIS , 2008, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[8]  Francesca Pozzi,et al.  Towards development of a high quality public domain global roads database , 2006, Data Sci. J..

[9]  Pascal Neis,et al.  New Applications based on collaborative geodata – the case of Routing , 2008 .

[10]  Michael F. Goodchild Spatial Accuracy 2.0 , 2008 .

[11]  M. Haklay How Good is Volunteered Geographical Information? A Comparative Study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey Datasets , 2010 .

[12]  Christian Heipke,et al.  Crowdsourcing geospatial data , 2010 .

[13]  P.A.J. van Oort,et al.  Spatial data quality: from description to application , 2006 .

[14]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  The credibility of volunteered geographic information , 2008 .

[15]  Guillaume Touya,et al.  Quality Assessment of the French OpenStreetMap Dataset , 2010, Trans. GIS.

[16]  S. Elwood Volunteered geographic information: future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS , 2008 .

[17]  Steffen Fritz,et al.  Geo-Wiki.Org: The Use of Crowdsourcing to Improve Global Land Cover , 2009, Remote. Sens..

[18]  Dennis Zielstra,et al.  Comparing Shortest Paths Lengths of Free and Proprietary Data for Effective Pedestrian Routing in Street Networks , 2012 .

[19]  P. Anderson What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education , 2007 .

[20]  Hainan Chen,et al.  Quality Inspection and Quality Improvement of Large Spatial Datasets Hainan , 2010 .

[21]  M. Goodchild Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography , 2007 .

[22]  John Domingue,et al.  The Future of the Internet , 1999, Academia Letters.

[23]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  NeoGeography and the nature of geographic expertise , 2009, J. Locat. Based Serv..

[24]  Andrew Hudson-Smith,et al.  NeoGeography and Web 2.0: concepts, tools and applications , 2009, J. Locat. Based Serv..

[25]  Laura Díaz,et al.  Managing user-generated information in geospatial cyberinfrastructures , 2011, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[26]  Carmen Brando,et al.  Quality in User Generated Spatial Content: A Matter of Specifications , 2010 .

[27]  Gary L. Raines,et al.  Elements of spatial data quality , 1997 .

[28]  Dennis Zielstra,et al.  Comparative Study of Pedestrian Accessibility to Transit Stations Using Free and Proprietary Network Data , 2011 .

[29]  A. Zipf,et al.  A Comparative Study of Proprietary Geodata and Volunteered Geographic Information for Germany , 2010 .

[30]  Thierry Joliveau,et al.  NeoGeography: an extension of mainstream geography for everyone made by everyone? , 2009, J. Locat. Based Serv..

[31]  Peter Mooney,et al.  Using OSM for LBS – An Analysis of Changes to Attributes of Spatial Objects , 2012 .

[32]  Andrew Crooks,et al.  Mapping for the Masses , 2009 .