Patient Portal Use and Blood Pressure Control in Newly Diagnosed Hypertension

Background: Current evidence that patient portal use improves disease management is inconclusive. Randomized controlled trials have found no benefit of Web-based patient-provider communication for blood pressure (BP) control, but patients from these studies were not selected for uncontrolled hypertension, nor did measures of portal use occur in a real-world setting, as captured in the electronic medical record. This study determined whether patient portal use by patients with treated, incident hypertension was associated with achieving BP control. Methods: Between 2008 to 2010, 1571 patients with an incident hypertension diagnosis, ages 21 to >89 years, were identified from an academic medical center primary care patient data registry. Cox proportional hazard models were computed to estimate the association between portal use and incident BP control during follow-up (2011–2015), before and after adjusting for covariates. Covariates included sociodemographics, smoking, obesity and other physical and mental health comorbidities, and volume of health care utilization. Results: After adjusting for age, portal users were more likely than nonusers to achieve BP control (hazard ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.06–1.45). After adjustment for sociodemographics, portal use was no longer associated with BP control (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.83–1.16). Conclusions: Patient sociodemographic factors, including race, sex, and socioeconomic status, account for the observation that portal use leads to BP control among persons with newly diagnosed hypertension. Further research is warranted to determine whether there are benefits of portal use for other chronic conditions.

[1]  J. Salas,et al.  Use of an Online Patient Portal and Glucose Control in Primary Care Patients with Diabetes. , 2016, Population health management.

[2]  J. Salas,et al.  Cholesterol treatment and changes in guidelines in an academic medical practice. , 2015, The American journal of medicine.

[3]  Dixie Meyer,et al.  Depression leads to incident vascular disease: evidence for the relevance to primary care. , 2015, Family practice.

[4]  Erica F. Crannage,et al.  Race and Referral to Diabetes Education in Primary Care Patients With Prediabetes and Diabetes , 2015, The Diabetes educator.

[5]  J. Salas,et al.  Differences in prescribing patterns for anxiety and depression between General Internal Medicine and Family Medicine. , 2015, Journal of affective disorders.

[6]  C. Kruse,et al.  The Effect of Patient Portals on Quality Outcomes and Its Implications to Meaningful Use: A Systematic Review , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[7]  Jackson T. Wright,et al.  2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). , 2014, JAMA.

[8]  Neil M. Paige,et al.  Electronic Patient Portals: Evidence on Health Outcomes, Satisfaction, Efficiency, and Attitudes , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[9]  Chandra Y. Osborn,et al.  Secure messaging and diabetes management: experiences and perspectives of patient portal users , 2013, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  J. Marc Overhage,et al.  Online disease management of diabetes: Engaging and Motivating Patients Online With Enhanced Resources-Diabetes (EMPOWER-D), a randomized controlled trial , 2013, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[11]  D. Roblin,et al.  Validation of a Neighborhood SES Index in a Managed Care Organization , 2013, Medical care.

[12]  S. Fienberg,et al.  Current Population Survey , 2012 .

[13]  Elske Ammenwerth,et al.  The Impact of Electronic Patient Portals on Patient Care: A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[14]  C. Tullio Healthy People 2010: Objectives for Improving Health , 2012 .

[15]  Donald R. Miller,et al.  Using Administrative Data to Identify Mental Illness: What Approach Is Best? , 2010, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[16]  P. O’Connor,et al.  Are Claims Data Accurate Enough to Identify Patients for Performance Measures or Quality Improvement? The Case of Diabetes, Heart Disease, and Depression , 2006, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[17]  J. Day,et al.  Computer and Internet Use in the United States: 2003 , 2005 .

[18]  J. Jollis,et al.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. , 1993, Journal of clinical epidemiology.